Posted on 01/17/2012 11:17:52 PM PST by M. Thatcher
After a debate in which Republican frontrunner Mitt Romney faced attacks from all sides, the Romney campaign says it has not yet accepted invitations to participate in two high-profile debates leading up to the January 31 Florida primary, and a key Romney adviser is expressing fatigue and frustration over what he sees as a never-ending series of GOP debates.
"There are too many of these," Romney strategist Stuart Stevens said after Monday night's Fox News debate at the Myrtle Beach Convention Center. "We have to bring some order to it. We haven't accepted Florida…It's kind of like a cruise that's gone on too long."
Romney will participate in the next South Carolina debate, Thursday night in Charleston. Asked by email about the candidate's debate schedule after that, Romney spokeswoman Andrea Saul said, "I have no announcements to make on debates at this time."
As part of his complaint against the current debate schedule, Stevens expressed lingering irritation at the January 7 ABC News debate in New Hampshire, in which Romney faced a long a tendentious series of questions about contraception. ("It was such a lousy debate," Stevens said.) More generally, Stevens suggested that in the long course of the campaign, this year's key issues have been exhausted. "We're down to the most obscure questions," he said. "When more than ten debates mention Chilean models, and it's not a fashion show, then something's wrong."
There's no doubt the debate schedule has been intense. Seventy hours after the end of Monday night's session, the second South Carolina debate will begin down the coast in Charleston. Then, 48 hours after the polls close late Saturday in South Carolina, there will be another debate, this one in Tampa. Seventy-two hours after that, there will be yet another debate, this one in Jacksonville. The Charleston, Tampa, and Jacksonville debates will be the 17th, 18th, and 19th of the Republican primary season. Add that to the schedule of actual campaigning, and it's a routine that is wearing down all the campaigns.
On the other hand, Stevens may have expressed frustration with the debate schedule because Romney is facing continuing questions on issues the campaign would rather not discuss. On Monday night, Romney was hit with more attacks on his record at the private equity firm Bain Capital; more calls for him to release his income tax returns, and more criticism of his record as a "Massachusetts moderate," in the words of Newt Gingrich.
In what was perhaps his weakest performance of the season, Romney didn't really answer the questions so much as run out the clock. Responding to a query about the fate of a Bain-acquired company called AmPad, Romney ignored the question of a reported $100 million profit for Bain in a deal that saw AmPad go bankrupt. Asked about his tax returns, Romney seemed to search for an answer, finally saying he would "probably" release them in April. And during a discussion of voting rights for felons -- surely an odd topic to arise at a Republican debate -- Romney made no effort to defend his record but instead argued that the Massachusetts legislature was so overwhelmingly Democratic that he couldn't do much about the issue.
So it is perhaps not surprising that some of Romney's aides have diminishing interest in future Republican debates. In addition, it's not clear what opponents Romney will face, beginning in the Florida debates. Tim Pawlenty, Herman Cain, Michele Bachmann, and Jon Huntsman are out of the race, and it's entirely possible that another candidate, and perhaps two, might be gone by Florida.
The problem for Romney is that even if some in the campaign are tired of debates, the viewers -- the voters -- aren't. Television ratings for the debates have been quite high all year, and it's likely that trend will continue for the South Carolina debates. In addition, even at this late date, a lot of voters are just now tuning in to the Republican race. In a casual conservation Sunday, a top South Carolina Republican recalled an extended-family dinner over Christmas in which he asked relatives whether they had watched the debates. No one in the family -- several dozen people -- had watched even one. Now, with the campaign in their state, they're taking a look.
That phenomenon of late voter engagement and high ratings will likely continue, at least through Florida -- provided, of course, the frontrunner decides to take the stage.
Words to live by.
The campaign is wondering, will he lose more support by debating and losing or by being a no show chicken?
Romney is a loser. If he gets the nomination Obama will eat his lunch.
Two words: glass jaw.
I can’t stand how Romney pronounces “Legislator” and “Legislature” as “Ledislator” and “Ledislature”. What is that all about?
I also can’t stand that annoying half-smile that he always has on his face.
I also can’t stand how he is so smug and used to being the boss that he says things like “I’ll answer how I want to answer” and “I’ll take a little more time” on his answers, giving himself permission to go over the allotted time.
I also can’t stand how he gets over 50% of the questions or time to talk.
Come to think of it, there’s nothing I CAN stand about the man.
I strongly strongly urge he decline to do the Florida debates. Especially, if it would be bad for him.
I hope he does skip the debates. Let him go silently into the night, to be forgotten as soon as possible.
LOL
->>If he gets the nomination Obama will eat his lunch.”
It will not be pretty. What where the insiders thinking; his record alone will cream him. This is not only sad, but funny.
Obama loves fried chicken.
Dittos,I have had enough of Arrogant Snobs like romney,he wants to be President and he will not do this and Not do that and I will dictate. Screw you Romney,where was all this Arrogance when the Democrats were putting you in your place. You expect Harry Reid And Pelosi to bend to your Wimpy ass
One major mistake yesterday, and maybe another here. I’m sensing a Romney collapse now.
His major mistake yesterday was saying that he would release his tax returns in time for Obama to use them against him, but not in time for Newt and the others to use them against him.
His possible mistake here is, of course, bypassing the debates. If he thinks he can sit on a lead, he might want to talk to Bush-43 regarding his 5 to 10 point lead a week before the 2000 election, and his strategy of his last week of his campaign (which, believe it or not, had a victory lap through Texas the last weekend...that was stopped at the last minute).
What makes the debates tough for Romney now is that Huntsman isn’t there to prop him up and take take some of the questions. Romney’s out on his own and he’s finding the Republican Party not very receptive.
Romney does not have to debate at all. The reason? He has already been anointed by the RINO GOP and the “fix is in” on the selection of our next Republican presidential selectee.
Everyone needs to give their money to his campaign and go home. Nothing more to see here.
/Sarc
We are all sick of debates.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.