Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fast and Furious: Refuse to Testify? Here's a Subpoena
Townhall.com ^ | January 19, 2012 | Katie Pavlich

Posted on 01/19/2012 1:04:47 PM PST by Kaslin

Chairman of the House Oversight Committee Darrell Issa is back on the Fast and Furious trail and announced the issuance of a new subpoena today to Chief of the Criminal Division in the U.S Attorney's Office for Arizona Patrick Cunningham. Cunningham was asked politely to voluntarily testify before the committee about Operation Fast and Furious, but refused. In a letter sent to Cunningham announcing the subpoena, Issa doesn't mince words, saying Cunningham approved tactics used in the lethal program. Cunningham was scheduled for an interview with Issa today but canceled after implying he was willing to cooperate with the investigation, further delaying the Oversight Committee's ability to get to the bottom of Fast and Furious. Considering Justice Department officials have done nothing but stonewall Issa up to this point, the move wasn't surprising and this tactic is nothing new.  

“During the course of our investigation, the Committee has learned of the outsized role played by the Arizona U.S. Attorney’s Office – and you specifically – in approving the unacceptable tactics used in Fast and Furious,” Chairman Issa wrote to Cunningham in a letter informing him of the subpoena.  “Senior Justice Department officials have recently told the Committee that you relayed inaccurate and misleading information to the Department in preparation for its initial response to Congress."

Cunningham is under fire for participating in the cover up of the program even after Congress launched an investigation.

 “These officials told us that even after Congress began investigating Fast and Furious, you continued to insist that no unacceptable tactics were used.  In fact, documents obtained confidentially just last week appear to confirm that you remained steadfast in your belief that no unacceptable tactics were used, even after the Department’s initial response to the congressional inquiry.  Given that the Attorney General has labeled these tactics as unacceptable and Fast and Furious as ‘fundamentally flawed,’ this position is startling,” Issa wrote.

Remember, Arizona U.S. Attorney Dennis Burke, Cunningham's boss, resigned in August just two weeks after giving closed door testimony to the House Oversight Committee. He did not mention Fast and Furious in his resignation letter addressed to President Obama. Attorney General Eric Holder will face his day before the committee on February 2, just over a week away.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: arizona; atf; az; banglist; dea; dennisburke; dhs; doj; fastandfurious; fbi; gunrunner; gunwalker; holder; obama; patrickcunningham
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: TigersEye
Issue a no-knock warrant, send in a SWAT, bust his doors down at 0-dark thirty, shoot his dogs, stomp his cats, throw his half naked wife on the floor, point guns at their heads, put knees in their backs, break up their possessions, rip their doors off their hinges, drag them out in zip-tie cuffs and leave their house open to thieves while you let them cool their heels in a jail cell.

Why not? Dupnick does it in Tucson.

21 posted on 01/19/2012 3:50:58 PM PST by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
further delaying the Oversight Committee

This is all part of the rat playbook. Every time we fall for their tactics, it's running out the clock.

Is Cong. Issa stupid? Carry around a pad of blanket subpoena's everywhere. Call the guy who resigned. Make him take the stand and perjure himself, but do this today.

Hell, Hussein has destroyed the Constitution. Send the Sargent of Arms to this guys house in a Black Maria. Haul these rats out of their holes and water board him.

Congress needs it's own SWAT team. Do it now, while it's still light out

Go get them, you coward! We can no longer suffer these fools.

22 posted on 01/19/2012 3:57:30 PM PST by STD (Cut Taxes, Cut Spending Stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Keep stonewalling, Dems. All the better to keep it bubbling along right through the general election, my dear.


23 posted on 01/19/2012 3:58:57 PM PST by jiggyboy (Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone
Why not? Dupnick does it in Tucson.

Definitely! In the Dupnik tradition the SWAT members should be SEAL wannabes with Barney Fife training and none of them should have ever met much less trained together.

24 posted on 01/19/2012 4:11:56 PM PST by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I would like for the Republicans to publicly ask Democrats why appointees should not be required to answer Congressional questions as a condition of employment, and why refusal to answer such questions should not be considered adequate grounds for impeachment and removal?


25 posted on 01/19/2012 4:21:39 PM PST by supercat (Renounce Covetousness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: milwguy

He’ll find any excuse not to have to answer. The rats are after all so predictable


26 posted on 01/19/2012 4:29:33 PM PST by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TLI

“Waiting on the arrest warrants...”

I don’t think this investigation will result in any arrests. Congressional investigations always end these days with a report and no teeth. Been that way every since “The Star” report.


27 posted on 01/19/2012 5:44:24 PM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: supercat

Shoot that’s too nice. Just impeach them (if the GOP had a sliver of a cojone left).


28 posted on 01/19/2012 8:06:10 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Sometimes progressives find their scripture in the penumbra of sacred bathroom stall writings (Tzar))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Revel
All too true.

But this one is much bigger than most. Heinous in its nature and when all the facts are laid out it will likely point to an end run around voting to eliminate Second Amendment Rights in the united States. And we just might have seen the first big crack in the ice...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2835463/posts

Pleading the Fifth can prevent him from incriminating himself but it also is a clear indicator that Issa is getting very close now. Patrick J. Cunningham is the chief of the criminal division in the U.S. Attorney's Office. His representation submitted this as the reason for going with the Fifth.

“My client is, in fact, innocent, but he has been ensnared by the unfortunate circumstances in which he now stands between two branches of government. I will therefore be instructing him to assert his constitutional privilege,” Mr. Romero wrote.

Ok, he is the criminal division chief "ensnared by the unfortunate circumstances." How could he be in that position unless someone put him there? A subordinate could not do that so it must have been someone above him.

Who is above the the chief of the criminal division in the U.S. Attorney's Office in Arizona?

Just who is his boss?

:-)

.

29 posted on 01/20/2012 10:55:16 AM PST by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: TLI

Well we can hope. But I am still not holding my breath. No question as to some real criminal activity going on.


30 posted on 01/20/2012 11:21:25 AM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]




Boop Her Nose!

Kitty Is Too Tired to Donate
How About You?


Become a Monthly Donor
Sponsors will contribute $10
For each new monthly sign-up

31 posted on 01/20/2012 11:28:05 AM PST by TheOldLady (FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson