Posted on 01/19/2012 1:04:47 PM PST by Kaslin
Why not? Dupnick does it in Tucson.
This is all part of the rat playbook. Every time we fall for their tactics, it's running out the clock.
Is Cong. Issa stupid? Carry around a pad of blanket subpoena's everywhere. Call the guy who resigned. Make him take the stand and perjure himself, but do this today.
Hell, Hussein has destroyed the Constitution. Send the Sargent of Arms to this guys house in a Black Maria. Haul these rats out of their holes and water board him.
Congress needs it's own SWAT team. Do it now, while it's still light out
Go get them, you coward! We can no longer suffer these fools.
Keep stonewalling, Dems. All the better to keep it bubbling along right through the general election, my dear.
Definitely! In the Dupnik tradition the SWAT members should be SEAL wannabes with Barney Fife training and none of them should have ever met much less trained together.
I would like for the Republicans to publicly ask Democrats why appointees should not be required to answer Congressional questions as a condition of employment, and why refusal to answer such questions should not be considered adequate grounds for impeachment and removal?
He’ll find any excuse not to have to answer. The rats are after all so predictable
“Waiting on the arrest warrants...”
I don’t think this investigation will result in any arrests. Congressional investigations always end these days with a report and no teeth. Been that way every since “The Star” report.
Shoot that’s too nice. Just impeach them (if the GOP had a sliver of a cojone left).
But this one is much bigger than most. Heinous in its nature and when all the facts are laid out it will likely point to an end run around voting to eliminate Second Amendment Rights in the united States. And we just might have seen the first big crack in the ice...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2835463/posts
Pleading the Fifth can prevent him from incriminating himself but it also is a clear indicator that Issa is getting very close now. Patrick J. Cunningham is the chief of the criminal division in the U.S. Attorney's Office. His representation submitted this as the reason for going with the Fifth.
My client is, in fact, innocent, but he has been ensnared by the unfortunate circumstances in which he now stands between two branches of government. I will therefore be instructing him to assert his constitutional privilege, Mr. Romero wrote.
Ok, he is the criminal division chief "ensnared by the unfortunate circumstances." How could he be in that position unless someone put him there? A subordinate could not do that so it must have been someone above him.
Who is above the the chief of the criminal division in the U.S. Attorney's Office in Arizona?
Just who is his boss?
:-)
.
Well we can hope. But I am still not holding my breath. No question as to some real criminal activity going on.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.