Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mitt Romney: middle income Americans are focus, not very poor [Oh boy...]
CNN ^ | February 1, 2012 | Interview w Soledad O'Brien

Posted on 02/01/2012 5:53:29 AM PST by notsofastmyfriend

Edited on 02/01/2012 7:25:16 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 next last
To: notsofastmyfriend

This sure is some depressing sh*t... and it looked so hopeful just a few months ago.

I guess Obama can measure the Oval Office for his new prayer rug.


61 posted on 02/01/2012 7:33:35 AM PST by ScottinVA (Liberal logic: 0bamacare mandate is acceptable... but voter IDs are unconstitutional.Oh, let me gues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
Please oh Please not a Romney political dynasty.

Not to worry... no chance of a Romney presidency. He may "win" the nomination, but Obama will wipe him out in the general election. Victory was never the intent for the estabs... just a graceful defeat.

62 posted on 02/01/2012 7:35:39 AM PST by ScottinVA (Liberal logic: 0bamacare mandate is acceptable... but voter IDs are unconstitutional.Oh, let me gues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
Actually, a nice looking bunch of kids who are successful and giving their parents a bunch of beautiful grandkids.

I'm not going to attack them for that...though they do have some pretty intense eyes.

I wish more American families could be as successful and avoid divorce and family breakups which, to date, they seem to be doing.

This does not change the fact that their father has taken too many liberals positions as a moderate in MA so he could get elected there. He had to, or he would not have been governor...and he governed in a state where 85% of the state legislature was dyed in the wool DNC.

But that does not excuse the positions or the difficulty it naturally brings when he runs for a GOP nomination and backtracks on all of those to try to win this election.

I do not believe he is the anti-christ or involved in some deep dark conspiracy to undermine the GOP and change it. I know that he persoanlly is against abortion and gay-marriage, but his public stances made room for them, as did his governance, and that will never set well with any true conservatve.

As a result, he will have a much more difficult time differentiating himself from Obama because the left simply will not let him...they will pull quotes like this one and hundreds of others made while he governd moderately in MA to keep him from doing so.

What has to happen is that Rick Santorum has to see the handwriting on the wall and bow out and throw his support behind Newt. Together they will be able to put a much more conservative candidate into office.

This table makes that clear:


Romney Gingrich Santorum Paul Huntsman Perry Bachman Totals
Votes % Delegts Votes % Delegts Votes % Delegts Votes % Delegts Votes % Delegts Votes % Delegts Votes % Delegts Votes Delegts
Iowa 39,805 30.46% 7 16,163 12.37% 2 29,839 22.83% 7 26,036 19.92% 7 245 0.19% 0 12,557 9.61% 0 6,046 4.63% 0 130,691 23
New Hampshire 97,532 39.77% 7 23,411 9.55% 0 23,362 9.53% 0 56,848 23.18% 3 41,945 17.11% 0 1,766 0.72% 0 349 0.14% 0 245,213 10
South Carolina 167,279 27.75% 2 243,153 40.34% 23 102,055 16.93% 0 77,993 12.94% 0 1,161 0.19% 0 2,494 0.41% 0 494 0.08% 0 602,821 25
Florida 771,842 46.30% 50 531,294 31.87% 0 222,248 13.33% 0 116,776 7.00% 0 6,182 0.37% 0 6,742 0.40% 0 3,947 0.24%   1,667,223 50
                                               
                                               
                                               
                                               
                                               
                                               
                                               
                                               
                                               
                                               
                                               
At large Dels     18     2     1     0     0     0     0   21
TOTALS 1,076,458 40.81% 84 814,021 30.86% 27 377,504 14.31% 8 277,653 10.53% 10 49,533 1.88% 0 23,559 0.89% 0 10,836 0.41% 0 2,637,756 129

63 posted on 02/01/2012 7:36:49 AM PST by Jeff Head (Liberty is not free. Never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

Mccain part II


64 posted on 02/01/2012 7:37:13 AM PST by RummyChick (It's a Satan Sandwich with Satan Fries on the side - perfect for Obama 666)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: notsofastmyfriend

Romney going to get SS protection now that he won florida

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/exclusive-mitt-romney-to-receive-secret-service-protection/


65 posted on 02/01/2012 7:38:40 AM PST by RummyChick (It's a Satan Sandwich with Satan Fries on the side - perfect for Obama 666)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nwrep
You can't accuse Myth of being both a liberal and a heartless capitalist who likes to fire people.

Why not? There are lots of such folks on Wall Street: absolutely ruthless in running their business, don't care a wit about anyone around them, but back every expansion of state power on the plea that it will "save the earth", "protect a woman's right to chose", "is for the children", . . .

The one thing that suggests Willard shouldn't be called a "liberal" is not his delight in firing people, but the fact that "liberals" don't give away their own money to charity: they expect the state to do what charity should out of tax dollars.

The best thing that can be said for him is in the context of Massachusetts politics, the GOP followed the Buckley rule and ran the most conservative electable candidate. (Sad comment on Massachusetts.)

66 posted on 02/01/2012 7:40:43 AM PST by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

They all look nutz. ALso, they have a weird, plasticky facial expression that I associate with one thing only: Mormon missionaries.


67 posted on 02/01/2012 7:44:05 AM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

His sons aren’t very good looking at all, and his wife’s not all that bad....weird. I’m so used to looking at what’s in the WH now, it’s going to take some really strong dose of ugly to beat them. Big Wookie with the bird feeder lower jaw and an arse with a big enough shelf to use as a couch and their kids are hideous. The giant one with the big butt looks like an alien and the short, fat one is ugly as home made sin.


68 posted on 02/01/2012 7:44:17 AM PST by mojitojoe (SCOTUS.... think about that when you decide to sit home and pout because your candidate didn't win)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe

Mitt’ll fix the safety net with more trillions of your tax dollars.


69 posted on 02/01/2012 7:47:33 AM PST by bigdirty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: notsofastmyfriend

Anything else Repubs can do to guarantee a landslide obama victory?


70 posted on 02/01/2012 7:50:21 AM PST by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

Now where did I put my ‘ TOAST “ jpg picture


71 posted on 02/01/2012 7:53:05 AM PST by Para-Ord.45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: nwrep; The_Reader_David
Quote nwrep "You can't accuse Myth of being both a liberal and a heartless capitalist who likes to fire people."

Of course you can! The liberal elite love to exploit the benefits of capitalism while applying socialist policies to minions the want to control.

Quote The_Reader_David "...the fact that "liberals" don't give away their own money to charity: they expect the state to do what charity should out of tax dollars."

Ain't that the truth!

72 posted on 02/01/2012 7:53:33 AM PST by Never on my watch (As a matter of fact, IT IS something worth getting angry over!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: bigdirty

I don’t know why you’re telling me that unless you are trying to stick up for the homely obongo family. I despise Mitt Romney. I suggest you take a stroll down memory lane and check all of my past posts and find one where I said anything good about that sorry POS.


73 posted on 02/01/2012 7:58:52 AM PST by mojitojoe (SCOTUS.... think about that when you decide to sit home and pout because your candidate didn't win)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: OKSooner

He is really bad at giving them out of context ammunition. Remember his “I like firing people” comment? He was actually talking about firing “companies” because he no longer needs the service the provide. But his wording gave the MSM a great sound bite.

And he just did it again.

And you can count on him doing it many more times before the election unless he goes Obama and does the all teleprompter all the time thing.


74 posted on 02/01/2012 8:01:05 AM PST by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: notsofastmyfriend

If Romney gets the nod, I am done with the GOP. Will vote for the House and Senate, but will either do write-in or go 3rd party.


75 posted on 02/01/2012 8:01:14 AM PST by Biggirl ("Jesus talked to us as individuals"-Jim Vicevich/Thanks JimV!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

That post makes the one I just submitted totally redundant. I gotta learn to read threads before I start posting.

Wait, I’m doing it again.


76 posted on 02/01/2012 8:02:14 AM PST by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: notsofastmyfriend
mitt never had a chance... The choice is between a polite communist republican criminal and a fire breathing, black activist, marxist America hating, usurping fagot liar. Progressive America will elect obama before they elect mister whitebread commiecrat.

LLS

77 posted on 02/01/2012 8:03:46 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (Hey repubic elite scumbags... jam mitt up your collective arses!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Or Romney could try to do what McCain did, put a conservative on the ticket. But will it work this time around?


78 posted on 02/01/2012 8:04:03 AM PST by Biggirl ("Jesus talked to us as individuals"-Jim Vicevich/Thanks JimV!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: notsofastmyfriend

This is wrong on so many levels. With Romney as the nominee, looks like the GOP is going back to permanent minority party status!


79 posted on 02/01/2012 8:07:23 AM PST by libertarian neocon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

Hell no! It didn’t work last time either... mcbuttface lost!

LLS


80 posted on 02/01/2012 8:08:19 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (Hey repubic elite scumbags... jam mitt up your collective arses!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson