"...if it smells like fish,acts like fish......????,,,wait I lost my train of thought"
Posted on 03/04/2012 1:54:02 PM PST by Netizen
This is more serious than her or any one person's sex life. They are trying to force religious groups to cover birth control against their beliefs.
She misrepresented a lot of things in her testimony and she should be taken to task for it and while Rush should do it, he may find his hands tied at this point and not be able to do it without looking like he is still attacking her.
She misrepresented the woman that might have endometriosis. Sure, surgery is the only way to confirm, but, no Dr should just write prescriptions for unconfirmed diagnosis. The insurance would cover the surgery, so why wasn't the surgery done to get that confirmation?
Her testimony is full of smoke and mirrors. She claims near the end that it isn't a war against the church, but how many times does she mention church, jesuits, or religion?
Rush or someone needs to get a good OB/GYN to go over the testimony with a fine tooth comb and take it apart.
Excellent Post!
Aren't they? Are men allowed to get the pill paid for in their coverage?
Without her taking the birth control, a massive cyst the size of a tennis ball had grown on her ovary. She had to have surgery to remove her entire ovary.
So, now her problem is solved. No worries for a gay woman.
Ahhh... the slut speaks.
Thanks. I just don’t want people to miss the real implications here.
I had to use the google html to be able to copy and paste and wasn’t sure which link to use up above. :)
Bump
Fluck that imbecile socialist. (I noticed that myself)
Man, the Society of Jesus, such as it has become, really went south. It’s neither authentically Catholic nor biblical now.
Can this be verified? I am reading all kinds of things that she graduated in 2003 and is a 31 y.o. lawyer. I'm waiting for Coulters column this week who I have absolutely no doubt will eviscerate her.
If Coulter can avoid spending her entire article lamenting about Rush’s calling her a slut. That is a valid thing to touch on, but as well as that she needs to be outed for the obvious: she’s a sympathizer to sluts and a cheerleader for sluttery on the public dime.
That’s why I say, its about more than getting those pills.
Lots of catholic women use bc, you just don’t see them advertising it on tv.
No priest is going to burst into your doctors office to make sure you are not talking about birth control.
At this point does it really matter-whose mind is it going to change the lefty lovin pill poppin Obama supporters I don’t think so.
She specifically targeted a Catholic school for her victim status. This activist did not just suddenly rise up to challenge Catholicism's opposition to birth control. She's been a "reproductive rights" advocate for YEARS.
She is ALL ABOUT the conflicts with religious identity.
Actions speak louder than words. She is ALL ABOUT the conflicts with religious identity.
They’re bucking for Caesar to override the church. Well why do they even bother with the church any more if this is what they’ve got their hearts set on.
"...if it smells like fish,acts like fish......????,,,wait I lost my train of thought"
“...and I’m a third year student at Georgetown Law, a Jesuit school”
And she wants the heavy hand of government to force said Jesuit school to do something against its institutional conscience.
This has morphed into a ‘women’s rights’ issue...when it should be a freedom of religion issue.
And somehow the dialogue has become ‘the Republicans are trying to take away a woman’s rights’....when it really should be ‘the catholic church is defending itself’. And make no mistake, the catholic church is not a part of the vast rw conspiracy. It can be very liberal - and it is having a disagreement with liberals.
How did the GOP end up on the defensive on this?
A lesbian who is worried about not being able to give birth to babies to please her mother?
She could always ADOPT since she chose to take HERSELF out of the gene pool.
You know screw (pardon the pun) Rush for apologising. Read her statement:
$3000 bucks for getting laid? How many times are we talking about here to reach $3000 bucks? The woman IS a slut!
My corner pharmacy sells condoms a buck each, how long is law school? 3 or 4 years? Do the math here people.
365 days a year...4 years doing it once a day would equal $1460. Divide $3000 by that...2.05 times a day EVERY day for four years! When I lived in the lower east side of Manhattan in the 1980s I knew HOOKERS who didn't do nearly that much! They would work 3 or 4 johns a week, once each, unless they were crack whores and would do enough to buy crack. RUSH WAS RIGHT! WHY DID HE APOLOGIZE?
And who is going to pick up the costs for STD treatments?
The hook up generation has an active “culture”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.