Posted on 03/04/2012 1:54:02 PM PST by Netizen
This woman is truly despicable. Imagine the outrage if someone managed to get themselves admitted to a Muslim or Jewish institution and then publicly and purposely went forth to ridicule, demean and scorn the principles upon which the school was built. Yet this woman considers herself some sort of persecuted hero. Just why would she choose a “Catholic, Jesuit” school? Of course one could argue that Georgetown has declined into something that should not be confused with being Catholic. (anybody read the brilliant law briefs being prepared by the Georgetown faculty challenging Obama’s Catholic bashing mandate?) If the Jesuits themselves truly were defenders of the faith (as they once were) and had not devolved into an unmentionable lot, they would at least expel this opportunistic rogue.
Yes, I know. Its just another area where she misled people.
Rush was being absurd.
He said that since she was asking for enough money to pay for several protected sexual encounters a day that makes her a slut.
He said that since she was expecting the public to pay so she could have sex, that makes her a prostitute.
He could have just called her a LIAR and said that her bogus numbers were inflated.
But she’d still be a publicity whore.
You get raped and don't report it?? I thought Georgetown only took the smart kids.
I think Michelle Malkin can rip this apart easily - however with this ‘slut-fest’ going on, the opportunity to rip Fluke’s speech apart now will not be heard.
You should try to tune into Rush tomorrow - I am hoping he can turn this around...brilliantly, of course.
Absolutely....All her testimony is “hearsay”....not one bit would be allowed in court without additional testimony.
2.05 times a day for 7 days makes one weak.
2.05 times a day for 365 days makes one raw.
Correction. I know she didn’t appear
My prediction: She’ll be on Ellen’s show next.
But still, when I went to college there is no WAY I, or anyone I knew had as much sex as this slut. And I had a steady girlfriend, and we did it maybe 20 times in 4 years, but that’s us. We weren’t married. And when we did I had the one buck condom, and if she needed the test it cost maybe $50 to $100 bucks. We probably spent no more than $500 bucks. Granted that was 20 years ago, but still, THREE THOUSAND DOLLARS? What this woman is talking about is just plain irresponsibility, being just as Rush said, a SLUT! Liberals always want to take childish risks as adults, and they always demand OTHER people pay for it! I CANNOT believe Rush apologized!
Malkin would be good, but I think you’re right. No one will listen now. I;m going to try to remember to listen to Rush. What time does he come on? Do you think he might take a few days off? I would, even if just to get my ammo ready.
You’re right. If nothing else, he should have waited til he could review what she said carefully.
Condoms are available at Amazon.com for $.20/each. BC pills are available at Target for $4-$9/month. Other forms of birth control are available over the counter at outlets all over the country. Don’t give me this bull that they couldn’t afford it. The horse is at the trough. All it has to do is drink. We do not need insurance for 20 cent condoms.
What this is really about ramming it down peoples throats, just like like they are trying to do with abortion and gay marriage.
I think Limbaugh made a fool of himself on this one. He should have stuck to these points, and maybe made light of how many times you can have sex with $1000 worth of 20 cent condoms, and when would you have time to attend classes at law school. Instead, he made himself the issue, and damaged us as well. Oh well. Now we have free unlimited condoms. Who knows. Maybe if they send them in the mail it will help keep the post office open.
He apologized because he called HER a slut when she wasn’t talking about herself. He had to do it. Like it or not, he at least admitted he said something wrong about her, which is a lot more then Sarah or Bristol Palin ever got from their detractors or Bush from his. Rush did the right thing, I just hope he can survive it.
“He should have stuck to these points, and maybe made light of how many times you can have sex with $1000 worth of 20 cent condoms...”
He did. That was the point of calling her a slut, because $1000 of condoms in a year would indicate a whole lot of sex was going on! And remember, Rush initially was responding to PRESS REPORTS, not a transcript of her testimony.
Everybody needs to go to Seattle and ride the S.L.U.T.-South Lake Union Trolley.
Order the t-shirt while you are at it!
http://ridetheslut.com/
Reminds me of that kook who maligned the American beef industry on Oprah's program.
I heard him on left wing hate radio spewing forth recently.
He said that his prosecution for maligning the beef industry was improper because he really believed that American beef would be infected with mad cow etc. within 10 years.
As George Costanza said, it's not a lie if YOU believe it.
Her claim was denied repeatedly on the assumption that she really wanted the birth control to prevent pregnancy. .......After months of paying over $100 out of pocket, she just couldn’t afford her medication anymore and had to stop taking it.
Names - give us the names!
At least report it to the Better Business Bureau - jeepers.
And then she will made the same rounds on the paid feminist speaking tour that Anita Hill once hit.
“when she wasn’t talking about herself.”
Technically. But initial press reports indicated otherwise, and her testimony was constructed to support the idea that “WE students are being harmed”:
“We can only answer that we expected women to be treated equally, to not have our school create untenable burdens that impede our academic success. We expected that our schools would live up to the Jesuit creed of cura personalis, to care for the whole person, by meeting all of our medical needs. We expected that when we told our universities of the problems this policy created for students, they would help us. We expected that when 94% of students opposed the policy, the university would respect our choices regarding insurance students pay for completely unsubsidized by the university. We did not expect that women would be told in the national media that if we wanted comprehensive insurance that met our needs, not just those of men, we should have gone to school elsewhere, even if that meant a less prestigious university. We refuse to pick between a quality education and our health, and we resent that, in the 21st century, anyone thinks it’s acceptable to ask us to make this choice simply because we are women. “
Lots of WE for someone who was actually trying to say THEY...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.