So gays have a right to make other people's children grow up with two daddies or two mommies, but they don't have a right to marry because . . . ? IDIOT.
1 posted on
05/10/2012 4:07:47 PM PDT by
madprof98
To: madprof98
Playing right into Obama’s hands. Economy has not been the topic on the news since this “evolution” of Obama’s.
To: madprof98
Does Myth expect us to forget that he has a history?
He’s a bald face liar.
Romney vs. Obama? One of them has to lose, I’ll rejoice in that fact, whichever it is.
3 posted on
05/10/2012 4:17:43 PM PDT by
Graybeard58
(Romney vs. Obama? One of them has to lose, I'll rejoice in that fact, whichever it is.)
To: madprof98
Gays should have the right to adopt children resulting from homosexual practices, not the children of straight people.
5 posted on
05/10/2012 4:19:35 PM PDT by
reg45
(Barack 0bama: Implementing class warfare by having no class!)
To: madprof98
Reminds me of Lot in the Bible. I don’t agree with the idea, but here take my daughters.
6 posted on
05/10/2012 4:44:44 PM PDT by
Idaho_Cowboy
(Ride for the Brand. Joshua 24:15)
To: madprof98
Gay adoption is a much greater travesty than gay marriage. Not surprisingly, milt has snatched defeat from the jaws of victory.
7 posted on
05/10/2012 4:47:56 PM PDT by
rhinohunter
(Not voting for etchamitt...no way...no how)
To: madprof98
wanted marriage defined on the federal level as being between a man and woman only, but also noted that he backs gay adoption. Too bad Mitt, only liberals can have it both ways. Unless of course......
9 posted on
05/10/2012 5:24:11 PM PDT by
itsahoot
(I will not vote for Romney period. You can't trust the man with the big red (R))
To: madprof98
10 posted on
05/10/2012 8:40:57 PM PDT by
Dajjal
("I'm not concerned about the very poor." -- severely conservative Mitt 'Etch-A-Sketch' Rmoney)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson