Posted on 06/10/2012 12:29:31 PM PDT by IbJensen
Thanks for the help.
Sounds about right to me.
Hilarious post! I had to stop and, yep.. There’s that certain smile there. LOL! Love the ‘Freddie Mercury’ mustache. LOL
“What makes you think “homosexual couplings” are common in the animal kingdom? They are not at all, particularly in the sense that you imply - that animals would have a specific preference for their gender over the opposite gender.”
I just googled “homosexual animal” and looked through the results. It’s not too difficult. Try it. I wasn’t trying to imply anything. I was just wondering why God allows homosexual activity in animals, since He could easily have prevented it altogether.
Cash. Money. Tons of it. PACs piled on PACs stacked on SuperPACs, trying for 20 years now to flush conservatism right out of the body politic with huge lube-jobs of targeted political money.
A couple of those PACs are in the habit of shooting max donations and steering/bundling lots more, to people opposing anyone with a smell of "family values" about him -- even at the alderman level, or county commissioner, or state representative in some flyover High Plains state like Iowa.
George W. Bush was cozying up to the Log Cabins back in 2000, while sending Rove around to hold hands with -- and lie to -- the Ralph Reed-led Christian Coalition Republicans, at the very same time Bush was dining in state with the Loggies, and his advance woman Mary Matalin was telling the gays that Bush favored SSM, opposition to which she branded "unfair". No, really -- it's out there. Old article from 10-12 years ago.
Money, tons of money, from people who never had to raise kids, but who have all sorts of hate for those who did.
The idea “thou shalt marry and be given in marriage” is corrupt and degenerate, which is an impossible immortality of a kind (i.e., eternal love), but not of the persons of men.
In your unabridged Oxford Dictionaries, the word “faggotry” denotes the bundling of steel to be hammered or rolled together.
Mammalian evolution is entirely heterosexual.
Monogamy is not required for evolution, monogamy is a tenet of religion.
To prohibit polyandry and polygyny is an ecclesiastic rule of law.
To establish an ecclesiastic standard of monogamy for homosexuals is nothing but RELIGIOUS FAGGOTRY.
All men are born of a woman.
If you have to tell grown men that babies will not come out of their rectums, there is no hope for any rational discourse...
The government of men’s external actions by religion, pretending the change of nature in their consecrations cannot be esteemed a work extraordinary, it is no other than a conjuration or incantation, whereby they would have men to believe an alteration of nature that is contrary to the testimony of sight and of all the rest of the senses.
The praeterpolitical power of the churches to institute monogamy as an ecclesiastic rule of law enabled them to determine the legitimacy of the succession of the pagan kings, abrogate the natural rights to property and self-defense, as well as gave them power of ecclesiastic censure for divorce.
The ecclesiastics would have men believe they will receive condign punishment for their contumacy of monogamy, as opposed to the freedom of the polygamy found in nature, which is inherently pagan.
This is a very good point cunningly elided by the Romneybots and RNC servitors of the would-be Masters of the Universe (aka the NWO).
My own strategery hopes for i) defeat of Romney as unworthy, deceitful, and way beyond unreliable for any patriot (he's even more NWO and, in the end, anti-American than Clinton or even Obozo), ii) election of 68 GOP senators to the U.S. Senate, iii) deposing of Boehner and McConnell as leaders of the congressional wing of the GOP (say, Darrell Issa in the House and someone like Saxby Chambliss in the Senate -- or name your own conservative stalwart), iv) impeaching, removing from office, and indicting Eric Holder (which ought to be Step 1, as part of a way to secure the defeat of the 'Rat senators who'll vote to acquit), and ultimately v) impeaching and removing from office Barack Obama, followed by vi) his and Nancy Pelosi's trials for felony election fraud and vii) Obama's and Bill Clinton's trials for high treason, corruption, and sale of their offices to foreign powers. viii) At some point, after Joe Biden is replaced with a real GOP conservative not named Willard, each and every E.O. signed by both Clinton and Obama would be expunged from the books, including Clinton's imposition of DADT and his impoundment of -- what was it? 22%? -- of the surface area of the State of Utah in national monuments created solely for the purpose of punishing Utah landowners for having voted GOP, and to buff Clinton's "green" credential at the expense of people who didn't vote for him.
Sound like a plan? Should keep us busy until at least the 2014 midterms.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.