You’re reading that wrong. Israel supports a two state solution. He’s not chumming it up with the Palis.
In fact, he was very shrewd in that he picked up on the attempt to get him to state the 67 borders where things should wind up. He deftly avoided that, and said the two main parties to this agreement were the ones that would have to determine that. The Leftist media has been trying to get Israel and the West to agree to the 67 border, before anything else is discussed. Hell no.
He’s actually been quite refreshing on Israel. His comments on Jerusalem were perfect. He’s doing better than Obama or Bush. For one thing, he isn’t attacking Israel the way they both did.
“Israel needs to show restraint (who cares if it’s being shelled non-stop from Palestinian territory).”
Bush and Rice used to drive me to distraction with their idiotic statements after Israel was attacked.
Romeny’s approach so far, is what needed to be said to bring both parties back together. Starting from a position of weakness sure didn’t work.
This is what i read...
“Presumptive Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney supports a two-state solution to solve the conflict between Israel and the Palestinian Authority, he told CNN during his visit to Jerusalem.”
But if there is a two-state solution there would be a divided Jerusalem...
and it wouldnt be the capital...
It could be that Willard just said what sounded good while he was in Israel...
After all he was there to collect tribute money..
IF he ever got the White House it wouldnt be long thereafter when his true policy towards the Jews was known...
The Palis would force his hand and Willard would back down...
In 2008 he said he wouldnt have any Moslems in his cabinet/administration because the Moslems were too small a % of population in the US...whatever that meant...
Well theres a whole lot more of them now...
Be interesting to see what he would do...
Purely for the entertainment value...
(I’ll also be counting the women and blacks but that a different story)