Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Buchanan: "There Would Be A Revolution" If Government Confiscated Weapons (video)
RealClearPolitics ^ | January 5, 2013 | RealClearPolitics

Posted on 01/05/2013 5:07:22 PM PST by i88schwartz

PAT BUCHANAN: There are three million ArmaLite rifles, those Bushmaster types, out there right now. And people are buying them like hotcakes, every gun show the sales are up enormously. Forty-one percent, they were up in December -- for last December, which was a record year. John, what is common though, Eleanor [Clift] is correct, the push is going to come on three things. Grandfather in the assault weapons that are here now, to try to outlaw assault weapons, outlaw magazines that carry more than 11 or 12 bullets, and also background checks at gun shows.

JOHN MCLAUGHLIN: With no Second Amendment, Congress could pass a law, as limited as this: banning assault rifles or as sweeping as prohibiting all private firearm ownership and requiring the surrender of all privately held firearms.

BUCHANAN: There would be a revolution in this country!

MCLAUGHLIN: Baloney! That doesn't mean you can't own one, but you have to put it in first and then go try --

BUCHANAN: There are 270 million guns in this country right now, John, and there adding to them at a rate of 16 million a year.

(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: barackobama; johnmclaughlin; mclaughlingroup; patbuchanan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-167 next last

1 posted on 01/05/2013 5:07:33 PM PST by i88schwartz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: i88schwartz
Ben Franklin testimony against the stamp act.

Q. If the Stamp Act should be repealed, would it induce the assemblies of America to acknowledge the right of Parliament to tax them, and would they erase their resolutions [against the Stamp Act]?

A. No, never.

Q. Is there no means of obliging them to erase those resolutions?

A. None that I know of; they will never do it, unless compelled by force of arms.


Q. Is there a power on earth that can force them to erase them?

A. No power, how great soever, can force men to change their opinions. . . .

Q. What used to be the pride of the Americans?

A. To indulge in the fashions and manufactures of Great Britain.

Q. What is now their pride?

A. To wear their old clothes over again, till they can make new ones.


Benjamin Franklin, Testimony Against the Stamp Act (1766)
2 posted on 01/05/2013 5:14:19 PM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: i88schwartz

Amen, Pat!


3 posted on 01/05/2013 5:17:51 PM PST by Wisconsinlady (The only thing to stop a bad person with a gun, is a good person with a gun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: i88schwartz
With no Second Amendment, Congress could pass a law, as limited as this: banning assault rifles or as sweeping as prohibiting all private firearm ownership and requiring the surrender of all privately held firearms.

Right. Perhaps I missed something, but we do have a Second Amendment and should be no less willing for it to disappear or to be disregarded than any of the others.

So what's the point?

4 posted on 01/05/2013 5:18:10 PM PST by DanMiller (Dan Miller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: i88schwartz

The Administration leaked the outline of its plans to the Washington Post. Obama wants a comprehensive law which he is not likely to get from the House. He no doubt will rage against the Republicans, the NRA and the TEA party and test the constitutional limit of executive orders. This will set an interesting tone for the upcoming debate concerning the debt ceiling.


5 posted on 01/05/2013 5:21:03 PM PST by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: i88schwartz

From my cold dead hands....are you listening Obama?


6 posted on 01/05/2013 5:22:07 PM PST by mort56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: i88schwartz
Pat Buchanan gets it; John McLaughlin does not. People who are buying up all this hardware and ammo are not planning on turning the over to government thugs and murderers. McLaughlin, understand this and burn it into your East Coast pea brain: If you come to disarm America by confiscating our guns, we will kill you. Molon Labe — if you dare. Remember this, too: Your side is outnumbered more than 230 to 1. Do you still feel froggy? Then jump, frog.
7 posted on 01/05/2013 5:22:19 PM PST by MasterGunner01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: i88schwartz

I think it was Levin who said that the Revolutionary War wasn’t fought because the British were wanting us to give up our DEER rifles


8 posted on 01/05/2013 5:23:14 PM PST by Optimist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: i88schwartz

What will people like Elinore Clift do when they push too far and things break loose?

Do they understand what they are doing?


9 posted on 01/05/2013 5:23:29 PM PST by jimbobfoster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: i88schwartz

There are more AR-15 type rifles in public hands in the last thirty years than 30-30 Winchesters in the last 110 years.


10 posted on 01/05/2013 5:28:24 PM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar (GUNS.. the rightful property of freemen, and formidable only to tyrannical governments.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: i88schwartz
The British people gave up their guns. The Aussies gave up their guns. Why won't the American people give up their guns?

As long as "The People" are given the unfettered ability to copulate, drink and drug themselves, evacuate their bowels, snore and attend the games there shall be no revolution if guns are seized.

11 posted on 01/05/2013 5:32:01 PM PST by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AEMILIUS PAULUS

“The British people gave up their guns. The Aussies gave up their guns.”
“Why won’t the American people give up their guns?”

Because we aren’t British or Aussies.


12 posted on 01/05/2013 5:40:14 PM PST by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: All armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: AEMILIUS PAULUS

what in the hell does that mean?


13 posted on 01/05/2013 5:43:18 PM PST by estrogen (voter fraud was huge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: i88schwartz

“”MCLAUGHLIN: Baloney! That doesn’t mean you can’t own one, but you have to put it in first and then go try — “”

I have no idea what he was going to say here - “put it in first then go try” what? Pat interrupted him and the sentence was never finished. PUT WHAT WHERE?


14 posted on 01/05/2013 5:48:21 PM PST by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: i88schwartz

There is a totally different mood in the country now than when the assault gun law was passed.

I had four brand new Colt H-Bars plus a few others such as HK-91, Egyptian Maadi, and Chinese Poly-darn can’t remember the rest of the word, but they were one of the best AK styles out there.

I was in grad school and needed money. I literally could not sell them without reducing the price to near wholesale.

Now it is a new world. I noticed two gun sellers near here which had an abundance of AR’s of various makes. I checked them both today and they are all sold out. Nothing like that happened before and there hasn’t even been a law passed.

I will say I loaded up on high capacity mags after the last ban sunset ted. I am not going to be caught short again.


15 posted on 01/05/2013 5:48:30 PM PST by yarddog (One shot one miss.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: i88schwartz

If foreign nationals do not have to comply with our immigration laws, I sure as hell don’t see Americans complying with the Democrats’ “gun control” laws. It just isn’t going to happen.


16 posted on 01/05/2013 5:49:57 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (Where can I pick up a 2013 Mayan calendar?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: i88schwartz

The fact that they are still talking about gun control, in the face of all the guns purchased - even recently - just tells me that they are going to do something REALLY bad.

They should have backed off by now.


17 posted on 01/05/2013 5:50:41 PM PST by Celerity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: i88schwartz

Hey Pat, do me favor, just go away!


18 posted on 01/05/2013 5:51:31 PM PST by Artcore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AEMILIUS PAULUS
The British people gave up their guns. The Aussies gave up their guns. Why won't the American people give up their guns?

I don't know how compliance fared in Britain but in Australia, it was pretty dismal. 680,000 weapons turned in out of 2.8 million firearms authorities estimated fell under Australia's ban.

19 posted on 01/05/2013 5:52:50 PM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Artcore

Pat is one of the few who are standing up for us so Pat please do not go away.


20 posted on 01/05/2013 5:53:03 PM PST by yarddog (One shot one miss.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-167 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson