To: SoFloFreeper
“O” and Evita probably were not ‘warned’ because our enemies got the message that there is NO ONE at the helm over here!
The prez and Evita couldn't have got a warning (directly or indirectly) even if they wanted to...positively NO ONE, in or out of the intelligence community or the nation at large, perceives them to be in charge!
Any ‘warning’ of that kind would certainly be a dead letter where these guys are concerned! It's all... ‘who's on first’ ... in this administration! Their lack of competency and accountability is beyond laughable.
5 posted on
02/01/2013 7:20:48 AM PST by
SMARTY
("The man who has no inner-life is a slave to his surroundings. "Henri Frederic Amiel)
To: SMARTY
Warning or not, there is not much you can do to stop a suicide bomber from killing a gate guard. By definition that is the perimeter where physical security starts. One has to assume there are all kinds of intelligence reports saying that an embassy is going to be attacked. What would we do other than close all the embassies?
8 posted on
02/01/2013 7:41:26 AM PST by
dblshot
(I am John Galt.)
To: SMARTY
Oh come on, Hillary! said that they get 1.43 million cables a year from around the world, so how can you expect any information ever to get through?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson