In tea party response, Paul will urge GOP to embrace immigrants, cut spending

CNN ^ | 12 Feb 13 | Mark Preston

[Graewoulf]

President of the United States of America Valery Jarrett has asked Teleprompter Guest Speaker Benghazi-Coward Hussein Obama to give her hand-written State of the Union speech tonight.

President Jarrett wants to remind all present that Democrats never keep their promises, and is using Sen. Teddy Bare Kennedy’s Amnesty deal with Pres. Reagan to underscore how stupid and gullible Republican politicians truly are.

The Kennedy Lie that conned Reagan has resulted in 11 Million Mexicans illegally invading the USA.

With Bolshevik Pride, President Jarret is bringing some of these Illegal aliens to the Bolshevik speech by Hussein Obama so that more Mexicans will be encouraged to illegally invade the USA.

Thus, the expected increase of the mighty weight of the next major invasion of Illegal Mexicans draining away the free stuff of the USA Welfare State will truly be the millstone that grinds America into the final halt that Jarrett and Hussein O. have worked so hard to achieve all of their sorry lives.

BTW, the one thing that will not be discussed by Hussein O. is just what really is The State of the Union.

[eartick]

I think the majority of the American Citizenry do not have a problem with Legal Immigrants.

But show me an illegal, river swimming, grass crawling invader and I will show you a person that needs to be drug back across the border by his or her genitals back across the border.

These type are not immigrants they are law breakers and are not qualified for citizenship to this great country.

[re_nortex]

The Kennedy Lie that conned Reagan has resulted in 11 Million Mexicans illegally invading the USA.

It was the same evil Ted Kennedy who "honored" his equally vile brother with the Immigration Act of 1965. In his advocacy of the act, Teddy series of lies included this statement:

"First, our cities will not be flooded with a million immigrants annually. Under the proposed bill, the present level of immigration remains substantially the same. Secondly, the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset. Contrary to the charges in some quarters, (the Immigration Reform Act) will not inundate America with immigrants from any one country or area, or the most populated and deprived nations of Africa and Asia. In the final analysis, the ethnic pattern of immigration under the proposed measure is not expected to change as sharply as the critics seem to think. It will not cause American workers to lose their jobs."

Really, was there no end to the deceit of this utterly wicked man?

[Graewoulf]

Yup. Same as now. Whatever a Democrat says, just KNOW that the opposite will be true.

BTW, you and I know this, so why are our sorry RINOs soooooooooooo very stupid? Must be the water in DC.

[SeekAndFind]

RE: Paul will urge GOP to embrace immigrants

LEGAL or ILLEGAL?

There’s a vast difference and without qualifying it’s hard to tell whether the above is supportable.

[ConservativeInPA]

Tea Party? Right (heavy sarcasm) Just a nut job like his old man.

[highball]

“So he’s the Tea Party spokesperson? Hummmm I don’t know a lot about him but I think his dad’s from another planet”

He might not be as outwardly loony as his dad, but he’s a hypocrite just like the old man.

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2010/05/14/rand-paul-cut-spending-but-not-medicare-doctor-payments/

Cut federal spending, but not the federal spending I get!

He’s not worthy of being a Tea Party spokesman. Not if we want to have any shred of credibility or intellectual integrity. And not if we want to be able to draw new people into the movement.

[Norm Lenhart]

Don’t worry. Plenty of ‘conservatives’ will be explaining why it’s OK to support the very party and people rolling over on illegals.

I am starting to think ‘Moderate’ is the new conservative around here. Last night one was going on about how supporting Rubio despite his preaching for the dream act/illegals was in fact, conservative.

Getting ever closer by the hour to just saying to hell with it and letting these idiots destroy the country. They seem to want it both ways.

If the most conservative site on the net is so lousy with apologists and moderates, and it is, there is no hope for anything. We are done.

[littleharbour]

Republican politicians are all idiots. Every time one of these morons opens his mouth and says Republicans need to be more welcoming to immigrants, they are buying into the Democrat/media slander machine. Republicans are in favour of immigration when it benefits Americans: i.e. when the people coming here are from societies that are known to be hard working, peaceful and willing to integrate with those who are already in America. That excludes anyone who is lying or cheating their way across the border and anyone who holds to an ideology that wants to destroy America from within. Conservatives suffer enough from scurrilous attacks from the Dems and their allies without Republican fellow travellers piling on.

[rcrngroup]

Oh, f*cking shut up, Paul.

If you dont get what the hell people are talking about then dont say anything.

.
Now THAT I understand!

ROFLMAO!!! First time I've smiled & laughed this evening!

There is absolutely no way that I can improve on the clarity & direct nature of that comment!

[RginTN]

Just damn. Pandering everywhere. Can’t Republicans remember Simpsn Mazolli won us nothing but more illegal immigrants??

[PghBaldy]

We will soon discover that the son is like the father.

[PghBaldy]

We need to shut down immigration from Mexico completely. Completely. No legal or illegal. We will become Balkanized very quickly. We cannot survive half Mexican and half American, and that is what will happen very soon if the idiots in all parties don’t stop the inundation from one country in particular.

[southernindymom]

That was my concern.. I’m a member of the Tea Party and when I saw that I was like WTH! I’ve heard Rand do some speaking on TV and personally, I think he’s as loony as his dad. Just shocked the Tea Party used him.

[southernindymom]

That’s what I’m thinking also.

[jpsb]

Here is his position, judge for yourself

I do not support amnesty, I support legal immigration and recognize that the country has been enriched by those who seek the freedom to make a life for themselves. However, millions of illegal immigrants are crossing our border without our knowledge and causing a clear threat to our national security. I want to work in the Senate to secure our border immediately. In addition, I support the creation of a border fence and increased border patrol capabilities.

Immigrants should meet the current requirements, which should be enforced and updated. I realize that subsidizing something creates more of it, and do not think the taxpayer should be forced to pay for welfare, medical care and other expenses for illegal immigrants. Once the subsidies for illegal immigration are removed, the problem will likely become far less common.

I support local solutions to illegal immigration as protected by the 10th amendment. I support making English the official language of all documents and contracts.

Millions crossing our border without our knowledge constitutes a clear threat to our nation's security. Instead of closing military bases at home and renting space in Europe, I am open to the construction of bases to protect our border.

[jpsb]

Attacking one of the very few good conservative in the Senate is not at all helpful to the conservative cause

"Sen. Rand Paul tells The Brody File that he will only vote for comprehensive immigration reform if the U.S. border is secured first before any sort of “probationary legal status.”

"He wants to see annual border security reports delivered to Congress by an independent agency before he will even entertain the idea of temporary legal status for illegal immigrants.

[BillyBoy]

>> Attacking one of the very few good conservative in the Senate is not at all helpful to the conservative cause <<

I see you've drunk the Paulbot kool-aid. Libertarian does not = conservative. There's a lot of overlap on economic issues but the "Ron Paul rLOVEution" types differ greatly from conservatives on social and defense issues. Rand Paul is too close to dear old dad's views to be trusted by conservatives. Applauding him WHEN he is conservative and pointing out where he differs from conservatives is not "attacking him", it is telling the truth. Rand Paul holds non-conservative views on multiple issues from Israel to immigration. Claiming he's "one of the very few good conservatives in the Senate" doesn't make it so.

>> Sen. Rand Paul tells The Brody File that he will only vote for comprehensive immigration reform if the U.S. border is secured first <<

Yeah, yeah, yeah, so did Simpson-Mazzoli when they passed the 1986 amnesty (in fact, it was called the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, despite the fact it obviously did NOT"secure the borders") George W. Bush promised the same thing in the 2000s. So did John McCain. ("'ll build the goddamned fence if they want it.") Obama's also claiming to secure the border. They all claim their "comprehensive" immigration "reform" will secure the border. Show me any amnesty advocate who pledges "I will grant amnesty while the borders are wide open and millions of people can continue to flood in here". None of them would say that because it would politically suicidal. Every single one of them pledges to "Secure the border first". None of them do so, making it as useful as Washington politicians all claiming to be "fiscally conservative". The fact Rand Paul broke his "no amnesty" campaign promise and is even discussing crafting legislation to create a "path to citizenship" for illegals when our border is so screwed up shows that he sold out. If you can't see that, too bad. Lucy will continue to pull the football away from you every time.

[jpsb]

Making good the enemy of prefect is a guaranteed path to failure. I am willing to take Paul at his word, I don't see him as a liar so I will cut him a little slack until I see just what exactly he comes up with on immigration. So far I am 80% pleased with what he is saying on immigration and 99% pleased with the rest of his comments.