Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China grabs land, says it's 'ours'
The Pioneer ^ | Tuesday, April 30, 2013 | Pioneer News Service

Posted on 04/29/2013 1:28:39 PM PDT by Jyotishi

New Delhi - As the face-off between the armies of China and India entered the third week on Monday, Chinese troops have further ramped up their presence by erecting one more tent. The Chinese also brought in three truckloads of supplies to replenish 50-odd troops at the stand-off site in Depsang Valley, Ladakh. A Chinese Army patrol of 50 soldiers intruded 19 kms into the Indian territory on April 15 and set up at least four tents then.

The latest reports that the Chinese have put up another tent despite Indian protests, will come as a major source of worry and embarrassment for the Government, which has so far tried to play down the incursion and suppress any information about it.

Even on Tuesday, officials of the Defence Ministry and Indo-Tibetan Border Police (ITBP) refused to confirm the news. ITBP DG Ajay Chadda said: "We do not have such a report. We are not in a position to confirm it as we do not have aerial surveillance capabilities."

ITBP sources said the Army would be in a position to confirm as they operate the UAVs and they may have satellite imageries of the area. The Army officials also said they were not in a position to confirm the news.

According to a detailed report from the site of the incursion, the additional tent came up after two flag meetings between the local commanders of the two armies failed to achieve a breakthrough.

A PTI report from Leh said that the Chinese have hoisted a banner in English outside their camp stating "You are in Chinese side." The Chinese soldiers are maintaining vigil along with two Molosser dogs, considered best for keeping a watch in these high-altitude areas. Also, their officers

were armed with Chinese Makarov pistols and the soldiers carried a variant of AK series of assault rifles.

However, the Indian and Chinese armies were not carrying out aggressive patrolling.

The report said the ITBP had managed to push intruding Chinese troops back by at least nine km before they settled down at the present location, which is nearly 19 km inside Indian territory in the Daulat Beg Oldie (DBO) at an altitude of 17,000 feet.

Responding to the Chinese banner drill, the ITBP also immediately erected flags with a message in Mandarin and English reminding the Chinese troops of "peace and tranquility agreement" and asking them to return to their side.

The Indian Government had ordered its security forces to maintain the status quo at the face-off position and not prevent Chinese trucks from coming to their posts to supply essentials to their troops.

The Indian troops were also asked to refrain from engaging in any verbal communication with the Chinese, officials said here on Monday. 

They added that the Indian security forces will maintain the status quo but if the Chinese increase their troop strength then the Army will have to take adequate action to protect its strategic interest.

They also said the Indian troops now deployed in the face-off position were adequately equipped to meet any challenge.

China insists that India should dismantle bunkers and other infrastructure in Depsgang Valley and Daulat Beg Oldie besides refraining from aggressive patrolling before withdrawing. These conditions were conveyed to India during the two flag meetings and New Delhi denied these claims and asked the Chinese to go back to their original position across the Line of Actual Control (LAC).

Officials said the Government was aware of these developments and the China Study Group, given the responsibility of resolving the face-off, was constantly in touch with all the stake holders including the Ministries of Defence, External Affairs and Home.

The Group comprises secretaries of Defence, Home, External Affairs and head of Intelligence Bureau and Research and Analysis Wing.

Meanwhile, the face-off will figure prominently in the Unified Commanders' Conference here on Tuesday. Defence Minister AK Antony will preside over the annual conference and will take stock of the situation in Ladakh in the wake of the incident.

In a related event, Defence Secretary Shashikant Sharma and senior Army officers will give the latest details about the face-off to the Parliament Standing Committee on Defence on Tuesday.

The members were not satisfied by sketchy details provided by the Government to the panel on Friday and asked the officials to come back to them on Tuesday with information like how the Chinese managed to intrude unchecked and steps taken to resolve the stand-off.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: army; china; chinaindia; chinalandgrab; india; ladakh; military; tibet
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

1 posted on 04/29/2013 1:28:39 PM PDT by Jyotishi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jyotishi

China is getting pretty bold.


2 posted on 04/29/2013 1:30:55 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("Deficit spending is simply a scheme for the confiscation of wealth." --Alan Greenspan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jyotishi

3 posted on 04/29/2013 1:32:19 PM PDT by Zuben Elgenubi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

4 posted on 04/29/2013 1:34:23 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jyotishi

>> The Chinese also brought in three truckloads of supplies to replenish 50-odd troops

Look for more trucks in about an hour, when they’re hungry again.

I guess they have all of the regulars at the N. Korean border; that left only the 50 odd ones to go to India.


5 posted on 04/29/2013 1:34:56 PM PDT by Nervous Tick (Without GOD, men get what they deserve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jyotishi

maybe India can throw a few bucks to Vietnam and have them kick China’s butt again


6 posted on 04/29/2013 1:36:31 PM PDT by molson209
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jyotishi
India knows that she’s dealing with barbarians on at least two of her borders.She lives in a *very* dangerous neighborhood.
7 posted on 04/29/2013 1:36:43 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Leno Was Right,They *Are* Undocumented Democrats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jyotishi

They’d better be careful, or Obama will draw a Red Line!


8 posted on 04/29/2013 1:36:56 PM PDT by GreenHornet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“China is getting pretty bold”

Just finishe reading Clancy’s Threat Vector”. This little stand off kinda reminds me of the book. Btw, it’s a pretty good read.


9 posted on 04/29/2013 1:37:37 PM PDT by snoringbear (E.oGovernment is the Pimp,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jyotishi

History has shown that this approach works more often than not.


10 posted on 04/29/2013 1:37:43 PM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jyotishi
China would need a war if we stopped buying their crap. They have to many
mouths to feed and killing off 1/2 their population in a zerg would be for their benefit.
11 posted on 04/29/2013 1:38:52 PM PDT by MaxMax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

Maybe they sent “F Troop”


12 posted on 04/29/2013 1:40:17 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MaxMax

I am rolling the dice and goin after Asia.

/ gratuitous Risk comment.


13 posted on 04/29/2013 1:41:08 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (The reason we own guns is to protect ourselves from those wanting to take our guns from us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jyotishi

What’s China up to/ Troops massed on their borders with DPNK and India...all the while threatening Japan and the Phillipines. Why so belligerent and why now?


14 posted on 04/29/2013 1:41:34 PM PDT by pgkdan (Some taglines never go away....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jyotishi

If a foreign power marched troops 28 kilometers into our territory and set up shop 19 kilometers into our country, we would be at war.


15 posted on 04/29/2013 1:43:27 PM PDT by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snoringbear

Is that one really by Clancy this time?


16 posted on 04/29/2013 1:44:00 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (Background checks, Mr. President? You first ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan

Because now they can back it up and we have Obama for a president so we won’t do a damn thing about it.


17 posted on 04/29/2013 1:44:47 PM PDT by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Jyotishi

Exactly what are “ODD” troops? Maybe the Chinese are sending they’re butt boys to the border.


18 posted on 04/29/2013 1:45:50 PM PDT by certrtwngnut (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998

Yeah but they’re picking fights on all sides at the same time. pretty damned brazen.


19 posted on 04/29/2013 1:47:36 PM PDT by pgkdan (Some taglines never go away....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: certrtwngnut

> Exactly what are “ODD” troops?

“50-odd troops” = approximately 50 troops.


20 posted on 04/29/2013 1:48:17 PM PDT by Jyotishi (Seeking the truth, a fact at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson