Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Say NO to GMOs in Your Food
Townhall.com ^ | June 4, 2013 | Chuck Norris

Posted on 06/04/2013 4:55:53 AM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-143 next last
To: kidd

According to a 2013 report by Food and Water Watch (FWW), “Monsanto’s day-to-day operations have wreaked havoc on the environment and public health.”[12] FWW specifically cites Monsanto’s past production of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). Monsanto produced about 99 percent of PCBs used by U.S. industry at its plant in Sauget, Illinois until PCB production was banned by Congress in 1976, due to their carcinogenic properties and detrimental effects to the liver, endocrine system, immune system, reproductive system, developmental system, skin, eye and brain.[12] Despite the ban, PCBs continue to be illegally dumped or leaked, and since these chemicals do not break down easily, they continue to cycle through air, water and soil for long periods of time. Thus PCBs continue accumulating in plants and food crops, as well as in fish and other aquatic organisms, which are then ingested by other animals building up higher levels of PCBs as they move up the food chain.[12]

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Monsanto


81 posted on 06/04/2013 7:14:28 AM PDT by sunny48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: tx_eggman; Black Agnes
Things you may notice that most yuppies won't are:

1) how labor intensive this form of agriculture is,

2) how tillage intensive this form of agriculture is,

3) how much water pollution is caused by this form of agriculture,

4) how the rules are rigged to make this form of agriculture seem much more sustainable than it actually is. (the rice seedlings are planted in one field, then those with attractive growth habits are selected and hand transplanted into a second field, but in calculating yield only the second field is considered).

82 posted on 06/04/2013 7:15:39 AM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: tbpiper

dead birds ~ free range chickens suffer a predictable death rate out wandering about ~ it’s a number above 0.


83 posted on 06/04/2013 7:15:42 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Aussiebabe

I don’t view humanity as my opponent.

Most of the left does. And sadly, most of the global elites in general.

I’m sorry you’re unable to think outside of the left/right paradigm and realize that’s a fabrication to divert our attention from the real agenda. Global population collapse and draconian control of the resulting much smaller population.

The left has caught onto this idea because it’s a popular meme. They won’t allow anything concrete to ever happen though. Just like the GOP supports(ed) the pro-life platform. Hasn’t changed the availability of abortion yet. It’s all talk for both. Both are population control methods and both will never be done away with.

When 90% of the food stuffs in the country are GMO I’m not sure how you think we have choice?

It’s actually very very very difficult to buy anything at a regular grocery store that does NOT have GMO food in it. Or any food eaten in a restaurant. That’s hardly ‘choice’.


84 posted on 06/04/2013 7:16:31 AM PDT by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Black Agnes

India has much of the potentially most productive land on the planet. They misuse it of course, but Monsanto can help folks like that, or they can trick you into believing they don’t poop in the rice fields!


85 posted on 06/04/2013 7:18:45 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: surroundedbyblue

They dropped the Type II diagnostic standard down 10 points and doubled the numbers.


86 posted on 06/04/2013 7:20:24 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: surroundedbyblue

Obesity is thought to be the primary cause of type 2 diabetes. The rise in type 2 diabetes is directly in line with the rise in obesity.

Perhaps because GMOs make food more affordable, people eat more food. But to attribute the makeup of the food to diabetes is baseless.


87 posted on 06/04/2013 7:22:04 AM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

Unapproved genetically modified wheat from Monsanto found in Oregon field
88 posted on 06/04/2013 7:22:38 AM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

One hopes you understand the differences between adulterants and genetic characteristics. Humans have been genetically manipulating the food supply since einkorn emmer, spelt and then wheat. Ponies and percherons are the result of genetic manipulation. Gernseys, herefords and jerseys are as well. Whether that manipulation occurs in the field or the lab concerns me very little.


89 posted on 06/04/2013 7:22:56 AM PDT by muir_redwoods (Don't fire until you see the blue of their helmets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky; Black Agnes
... the rules are rigged to make this form of agriculture seem much more sustainable than it actually is. (the rice seedlings are planted in one field, then those with attractive growth habits are selected and hand transplanted into a second field, but in calculating yield only the second field is considered).

Agnes ... care to comment?

90 posted on 06/04/2013 7:22:57 AM PDT by tx_eggman (Liberalism is only possible in that moment when a man chooses Barabas over Christ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky

“1) how labor intensive this form of agriculture is,”

Because that’s what’s available to the small plot holder in the 3rd world. They don’t even have indoor water seal toilets. But they DO have manual labor.

Because I’m sure nobody in Japan. Or China, or India will EVER automate this method. Neeeeevvvvver.

Because nobody has EVER automated anything with agricultural methods.

Instead of spraying hundreds of gallons of herbicide on a crop and having to do the same thing weeks or a month later...it would be simple to roboticize that component. Think Roomba.

How do you get water pollution from this form of agriculture? Did you even read the article? These guys are using WAY less water. Because as it turns out rice doesn’t NEED to be drowned all season in water.

They aren’t transplanted but once. Small plotholders don’t have the money to buy broadcast seed. They never have. What’s different is allowing the seed to presprout and transplanting the seedlings individually instead in clumps of 3 or 4. They’re also transplanted several weeks EARLIER than they were previously also.

Did you read the Cornell pages on this method?

Instead of supercrowding the seedlings to allow the canopy to close earlier and thus avoid much of the weeding/tillage, they’re spacing them and allowing for more tillering. Tillering != tillage

Now, answer me this. Why aren’t the Japanese doing GMO hand over fist? Why is it banned? I can see why they might ban OUR GMO stuff, they are the Japanese after all. But why aren’t THEY doing it? It’s not like they are a technophobe luddite society. What are they smart enough to figure out that our politicians have been bought off to ignore?

If the small plot holders can become self suffient with this method, even IF they never automate it doesn’t that negate a lot of the ‘grow this type of seed or all the little Indian children will starve’ argument?


91 posted on 06/04/2013 7:24:47 AM PDT by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: kidd

The irony here is that if you have diabetes the insulin you now use is GMO. They have bio engineered bacteria to produce insulin so they do not have to process it from pig pancreases.


92 posted on 06/04/2013 7:25:24 AM PDT by artichokegrower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: sunny48

I have to go to work but I bookmarked your link and will read it but there are 2 misconceptions in your post. The RoundUp readiness is not a genetic modification, it is bred to be RoundUp ready. And the GMO seeds do NOT self destruct! It is just illegal to save the seed and replant them.


93 posted on 06/04/2013 7:25:49 AM PDT by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: tx_eggman

Read the cornell page here:

http://sri.ciifad.cornell.edu/aboutsri/methods/index.html

They are transplanted ONCE. These farmers had previously been transplanting 3 or 4 in a clump and transplanting them several WEEKS later. They’ve ALWAYS transplanted them though. They can’t afford the seed to broadcast a crop. And broadcast seed would be too thickly planted for this method to work anyways.

BTW, I compared the yield with this method and it kicks to hell anything I found from University of Arkansas on yield per acre. Yes, I converted acre to hectare.

Can this be used on a 500 acre field? No, clearly not in the current means. HOWEVER, it’s the method that’s giving the yield. The IMPLEMENTATION of this method just happens to be human intensive. Mechanization is our friend. Because nobody ever used a combine before. Or a seeder. Or any other mechanized farm equipment.

What this is is a fabulous opportunity for some techie with a bent towards agriculture to automate the transplant and surface weeding techniques. Which should be ‘easy’ compared to broadcast seeding methods since the plants are on a predetermined grid planting.

Think Roomba, only in agriculture usefulness terms.

And you wouldn’t literally be pouring profits down the drain with the liquid herbicide out the tip of the sprayer. Repeated. And repeated. And repeated.


94 posted on 06/04/2013 7:30:55 AM PDT by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

What does poop have to do with rice fields? Or Monsanto?

Unless Monsanto is GIVING away clearfield rice and the glyphosphate to keep it so I’m not sure how the small plot holders would afford that.

And so far it looks like the SRI stuff is, acre for acre, kicking Clearfields butt. (Actually, from University of Arkansas, MOST rice beats Clearfield on a productivity basis) Using NO herbicide (so no input cost there) and seeds they’ve saved from previous years (so no input costs there either). Input costs are something the small plotholders can’t afford.


95 posted on 06/04/2013 7:42:29 AM PDT by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: kidd

And what causes obesity? Overeating, yes, but why don’t you do a little research on how HFCS and other food additive affect metabolism of carbohydrates & the subsequent insulin resistance.

Frankenfoods are killing us.


96 posted on 06/04/2013 7:48:43 AM PDT by surroundedbyblue (Why am I both pro-life & pro-gun? Because both positions defend the innocent and protect the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Aussiebabe

“Don’t worry, I will continue to eat GM food, and if you and the Greens are correct, it will kill off all of us GM supporters and you will get your wish and all of your opponents will eventually die off!”

It’s not that simple. Once these GMO crops infiltrate other crop populations, GMOs will be all that’s left. So you people who think you’re funny or cute or whatever with comments like yours are actually trampling on my rights. Your rights end where mine begin and you are taking away my right to avoid GMOs.


97 posted on 06/04/2013 7:51:04 AM PDT by surroundedbyblue (Why am I both pro-life & pro-gun? Because both positions defend the innocent and protect the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: surroundedbyblue

Actually, most medications contain some sort of GMO component. Either in the pilling agents or the encapsulation material or the coatings.


98 posted on 06/04/2013 8:07:46 AM PDT by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Black Agnes

It’s getting increasingly more difficult to escape these little monsters.


99 posted on 06/04/2013 8:14:26 AM PDT by surroundedbyblue (Why am I both pro-life & pro-gun? Because both positions defend the innocent and protect the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

A relevant followup to this is why are there so many MORE t1d and t2d’s around these days?

When I was in school, in my class of 200+, there were NO t1d’s. Neither in the class of 200+ the year ahead of me or the class of 200+ the year behind me. Now, that same high school with roughly the same number of students has 14 t1d’s. That’s not ‘better diagnosis’ or ‘poor parenting’.


100 posted on 06/04/2013 8:23:35 AM PDT by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-143 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson