Posted on 01/24/2014 4:50:25 AM PST by Kaslin
There is so much wrong with the following story that like other great art that imitates life, I think Ill let the story mostly speak for itself and many of the ills of society in general.
So, stop me if you heard this one .
Two lesbians put up an ad on Craigslist looking for a sperm donor.
This is not in dispute.
They put up an ad on Craigslist looking for sperm, like sperm are a couch or a T.V. or those old worthless beanie babies your haggard aunt collected.
In response to the ad, one William Marotta, who apparently thinks of his sperm as a couch or a T.V. or those old worthless beanie babies his haggard aunt collected, was subsequently chosen as the "donor"-- a.k.a. the father in olden times parlance.
Marotta it turns out donated sperm three times, according to the birth mother, who subsequently used a syringe to inseminate.
These facts are not in dispute.
And do you know what?
A child was born. A daughter to be exact, although labeling her as a daughter is rather old fashioned of me.
Nevertheless, the child is a daughter whose parents are one William Marotta, willing victim and father, and Jennifer Schreiner, mother, lesbian, dupe and duper.
Turns out that there was a good reason for Schreiner and her partner, Mr. or Mrs. Schreiner, mother part deux, lesbian, dupe and duper, to use a free ad on Craigslist trolling for sperm donors and willing victims.
They did it because they're poor. They couldn't afford to pay the fees associated with artificial insemination through a doctor.
This is the part where Art takes over, the jerk.
When one is poor, one might not be able to afford a child either, which the last time I checked-- that is daily as the parent of a 16-year old-- is MUCH more expensive than artificial insemination.
So, Mrs. and Mr. Schreiner, like all good American these days, eventually applied for welfare benefits to take care of their daughter. It's only right that the Schreiners should lay off the financial duty of taking care of their daughter on you and me.
And the state, like all good Americans, asked: What about the father?
Oh no; like all good Americans, the state wasnt concerned with his rights, or the psychological benefit a man might have in his daughters life.
The state was about the money.
When anyone applies for welfare benefits, both parents are examined for financial support, as is right.
Marotta and Schreiner both produced copies of contracts albeit different versionsthat acknowledged that one William Marotta, was indeed nothing more than a sperm donor and a willing victim and father.
Not good enough says the state, which doesnt want to pay out welfare benefits for just anyone.
It seems the state's position is that the sperm was not procured through a medical doctor as is required by law. In order to be transubstantiated from the outdated father-mother model to the new, improved mother-mother model, the sperm donation, according to humanists, has to be touched by a doctor.
Fish meet bicycle.
Apparently the humanists at the Kansas state legislature believe that sperm must first pass through their highest of high priests hands, the medical doctor, in order for fatherhood-- that is confirmed by sperms DNA-- to be stripped from a man and transferred to a women pretending to be a man, pretending to be a woman, who can then be the father in the only two senses that matters to the welfare statelegally and financially.
Or something.
We stand by that contract, says one of Marottas attorneys, Benoit Swinnen. The insinuation is offensive, and we are responding vigorously to that. We stand by our story. There was no personal relationship whatsoever between my client and the mother, or the partner of the mother, or the child. Anything the state insinuates is vilifying my client, and I will address it.
Too bad says the state, which wants Marotta to pay child support.
Im relieved that there was no personal relationship with THAT women.
Oh wait, no Im not.
Yes, I am. Oh, wait .
What a mess.
I dont know anyone who might have any valid reasons to question the wisdom of homosexuality as a lifestyle, artificial insemination or gay marriage.
You know, besides overturning millennia of legal, ethical and moral thought on these subjects.
Only racists and homophobes would do that.
And those type of people are obviously the very people who are uncomfortable with Art imitating life.
Because it isnt like Art has a daughter involved in this, right?
It's only a child, after all. And he was only the "donor".
Who now pays child support for a child he never wanted yet willingly fathered.
The liberal faith in the power of the legislature can't change the DNA evidence.
Good Job American Humanists!
Another grand creation.
Oh well. When you play God, as Mary Shelley taught us, you end up with a few Frankensteins. All you have to do now is kill the monster.
Really?
That last batch of straw bales I bought was a stack of homos?
:)
Haha. My sperm gets me a 3,000.00 tax credit every year.
"I do not avoid women, Mandrake, but I do deny them my essence."
Through my teens and early twenties, I tried to be a donor; but got VERY few takers...
People should be responsible for where they plant their seeds
Good news. The more consequences the less liberalism.
I’m HIV positive that this is a great idea!!!!!
This is giving Khent all kinds of ideas...
> That last batch of straw bales I bought was a stack of homos?
They were faggots.
Aw hell, I don’t even know where to begin with THIS one...
Somehow, “WTF?!?” seems to not even come close...
I make money off of CL, so whatever whatever.
bkmk
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.