To: ilgipper
The 4th paragraph in the article says it all ... SCOTUS normally doesn’t accept cases that haven’t gone through the lower courts. Wouldn’t read anything more into it than that.
To: tanknetter
I agree with Klayman.
This is the 4th amendment. Scotus is the arbiter of the constitution. This is of immediate, national importance. Violations are happening as we type.
10 posted on
04/07/2014 9:25:25 AM PDT by
xzins
( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
To: tanknetter
The 4th paragraph in the article says it all ... SCOTUS normally doesn’t accept cases that haven’t gone through the lower courts. Wouldn’t read anything more into it than that.Yes, they are very reluctant to set Constitutional precedent on anything other than a thoroughly developed record. And that's the way it should be.
To: tanknetter
40 posted on
04/07/2014 11:57:07 AM PDT by
arderkrag
(To conquer oneself is a greater task than conquering others. - Buddha)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson