Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/14/2014 4:16:18 AM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Tailgunner Joe

The ball less are now coming out from the darkness to kinda sorta weigh in on what should be done without critisizing the illustriuos leader who is on the way out kinda sorta


2 posted on 09/14/2014 4:22:34 AM PDT by ronnie raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Guess the pen and the phone are not enough for the Dems.

Pass the popcorn.


3 posted on 09/14/2014 4:25:06 AM PDT by exit82 ("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tailgunner Joe

The president can commit the full weight of the American military for 90 days without seeking Congressional approval. As much as I’d like to muzzle the muzzy it would also hog tie a good president and reduce his bargaining power. We’ll just have to hunker down and put up with this dangerous putz until January 20, 2017. (Does anybody have a link to an Obama-leaves-office countdown clock?)


4 posted on 09/14/2014 4:34:01 AM PDT by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Nancy’s nuts, an embarrassment to the country.


5 posted on 09/14/2014 4:38:14 AM PDT by reefdiver (The fool says there is no God. And the bigger fools sees direct evidence and rages against it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tailgunner Joe

I don’t see how the Obama could loose. If they vote against
it, he can lay the whole defeat on congress and Bush. If they
vote for military action he can say his hands are tied and
blame it all on congress and Bush. However, if either way
turns out to be the right move he will be right there ready
to take full credit. The guys an ass.


6 posted on 09/14/2014 4:42:14 AM PDT by Slambat (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tailgunner Joe

The solution is really quite simple.

Declare Syria to be no more. If ISIS is de facto controller of the new nation, there is no need to be concerned about what the former ruler Assad thinks. He has already lost the territory and is no longer the ruler. Of course that brings up the same problem in Iraq but Iraq is also rent asunder to never be whole again. Since there have been no real offensive action in Iraq into the Sunni regions by Iraqi “government forces”, it must be assumed that the partition is actually fine with the Shia.

Obama will be going to war with a new nation still in diapers.

I’ll bet there are lots of diplomats and lawyers in the US State Department and elsewhere laying awake nights chewing on this dilemma. There is no readily available precedent for application to an off the wall event involving the sudden emergence of a totally new nation yanked from two failing former nations. Tea and crumpets and cocktail parties and sumptuous dinners offer no solution to a problem that needs rolled up sleeves and real work.


7 posted on 09/14/2014 4:50:18 AM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc.;+12 ..... Obama is public enemy #1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tailgunner Joe

THIS WILL NOT WORK:

[Instead, the United States will expand airstrikes on the ISIS militants – including those operating in Syria – while providing “support for partner forces” fighting to eradicate the terrorist threat.

Obama also amplified his call for Congress to expand Title 10 – which governs military powers – to allow the Pentagon to arm and train Syrian rebels fighting both ISIS and the Syrian government.]

This is exactly why they go by different names - but the entire effort is one big happy family...

The insurgents in Iraq did the same thing - but the end goal was control and destruction of the Shia led govt.

Simple logic that the US politicians and the US media cannot wrap their little brains around...


8 posted on 09/14/2014 4:51:58 AM PDT by BCW (ARMIS EXPOSCERE PACEM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Airstrikes inside Syria?

The last time this was proposed...what happened? Putin stepped-in and humiliated Obama.

Does anyone notice how Putin is very silent on this issue?

He is just waiting for the right time........


9 posted on 09/14/2014 5:01:19 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Pelosi, a fierce opponent of the Iraq war under the George W. Bush, has toed the line between the liberal critics and Obama by urging a congressional debate on the use-of-force question, but stopping short of calling for a vote – at least for now.

Ummm...last time I looked Pelosi was minority leader and Boehner was speaker. Pelosi can squeal all she wants, but Boehner decides to call a vote.

Pelosi has no more power than Sen. McConnell has, except for the fact that she has the DBM on her side.

10 posted on 09/14/2014 5:49:42 AM PDT by randita ("Is a nation without borders a nation?"...Noonan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Pelosi, a fierce opponent of the Iraq war under the George W. Bush.
Bush told them what would happen if they pulled out and it did he gets the last laugh TOLD YA.
This mess of ISIS is caused by Obama and if they think the price was high under bush wait for this mess to end it’s going to be a very long wait.


13 posted on 09/14/2014 9:50:46 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tailgunner Joe

bkmk


14 posted on 09/15/2014 4:57:13 AM PDT by AllAmericanGirl44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson