Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pigeons Sitting on Stacked Containers Blasted by Tomahawk Missile
gCaptain ^ | February 9, 2015 | Rob Almeida

Posted on 02/09/2015 5:53:55 PM PST by artichokegrower

This video sequence filmed on 27 January 2015 offshore California near San Nicolas Island shows a Tomahawk Block IV missile launched from USS Kidd (DDG 100) and then followed by an F/A-18 until it eventually plows through a stack of containers stacked atop a moving ship.

This is the first time a Tomahawk missile has been used to hit a moving maritime target, according to the U.S. Navy.

(Excerpt) Read more at gcaptain.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: boom; tomahawk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last
To: Benito Cereno
affled by the “They survived” tag. Who cares?!?!

If they had not survived, animal rights activists would have been all over them.

21 posted on 02/09/2015 6:28:26 PM PST by The_Media_never_lie (The media must be defeated any way it can be done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

The obama administration has been very bad for California birds.


22 posted on 02/09/2015 6:28:41 PM PST by clearcarbon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

23 posted on 02/09/2015 6:32:08 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZOOKER; SunkenCiv; EODGUY; Nachum; SoothingDave

No, not really.

Did a paper a few years ago: For 48 destroyer and cruiser-sized ship actually “hit” by ANY weapon of ANY type (armed, unarmed, dud, air blast, torpedo, missile, or simple cannon fire) ONE TIME, not ONE of those ships in ANY NAVY was able to continue combat.

Now remember: “Continue combat” simply means you still have command, control, combat, and mobility, right?

So, your engine room must work.
Your rudder must work.
You must have 60 cycle power. (50 Hz in the EU). Cooling water to the radars. 400 Hz power.
Your CIC and radar must work and be able to issue control signals to the weapons.
Your radar or local telescope sights must work.
Your weapons must be able to load, aim, and fire.
Your bridge (or alternative) must be in control of the ship.

Well ....

Not ONE of 48 ships hit after WWII was able to do that.

We’ve got tin ships and wooden men.


24 posted on 02/09/2015 6:32:16 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Hey, I'm no sailor, just assumed that a hit at the waterline lets the ocean in. Ships sink when that happens (not always).

Hit on the bridge, you probably put it out of action, but the hull is still intact (not always).

25 posted on 02/09/2015 6:38:52 PM PST by ZOOKER (Until further notice the /s is implied...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Can’t imagine the orders to the pilot. Fly over the ship that is going to fire a missile at you.


26 posted on 02/09/2015 6:39:11 PM PST by artichokegrower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

There isn’t enough armour you can put on a warship that will withstand the ability of modern munitions to punch right through it. That’s why they started developing systems to target the munitions before they hit the ship in the first place.


27 posted on 02/09/2015 6:49:38 PM PST by sinsofsolarempirefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: boycott

Those looked like muslim pigeons to me. Their butts where in the air and they were facing east. It’s all good.


28 posted on 02/09/2015 7:32:05 PM PST by Gator113 (Cruz, Lee, and Sessions speak for me.... most anyone else is just noise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Ten feet higher and they would have missed.


29 posted on 02/09/2015 7:41:20 PM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

“I was on the barge and ‘shooed’ the pigeons away. It was nothing really.”
Brian Williams, honorary Admiral U.S. Navy


30 posted on 02/09/2015 7:47:36 PM PST by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower
Video says the missile was guided by the F-18. Great for terminal accuracy, not so good for pilot survivability if the ship or one of the escorts has the ability to do air defense.

Flying straight and level to do guidance is asking for a missile up the butt.

31 posted on 02/09/2015 7:51:02 PM PST by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
For 48 destroyer and cruiser-sized ship actually “hit” by ANY weapon of ANY type (armed, unarmed, dud, air blast, torpedo, missile, or simple cannon fire) ONE TIME, not ONE of those ships in ANY NAVY was able to continue combat.

Selective data set?

The USS Liberty was roughly destroyer sized. It took bombs, strafing and napalm, and still managed to engage the surface units that were attacking it. The defense was called off because while Israelis could attack the US, the US was not supposed to defend itself. In any event, the 'unable to continue combat' theory is refuted.

(Carefully?) Excluded from your sample would be smaller ships which also survived hits and continued in combat. See, for example, the frigate HMS Brilliant - hit by Argentine aircraft cannon fire, but able two days later to fire on an Argentine ship with her main gun.

Another British frigate, HMS Argunaut, didn't fare quite so well after taking a hit to the missile magazine. (Ship was hit by 2 1000 pound bombs; both were duds, but duds are covered by your assertions.) But she continued in combat by providing robust anti-aircraft fire against attacking planes.

I expect that if I did real research instead of just Googling from memory, I could come up with more examples.

So if we were to accept your narrowly drawn position as accurate, perhaps the lesson learned is that all destroyers and cruisers should be replaced with frigates and converted freighters.

32 posted on 02/09/2015 8:01:34 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Did a paper a few years ago: For 48 destroyer and cruiser-sized ship actually “hit” by ANY weapon of ANY type (armed, unarmed, dud, air blast, torpedo, missile, or simple cannon fire) ONE TIME, not ONE of those ships in ANY NAVY was able to continue combat. ...
...Not ONE of 48 ships hit after WWII was able to do that.

USS Gurke (destroyer) two hits from shore batteries didn't prevent the ship from continuing combat.

USS Collett (destroyer) FIVE hits from shore batteries didn't impair combat effectiveness.

33 posted on 02/09/2015 8:11:58 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie
Obama gave orders that no jihadi pidgeons can be injured.

On the contrary...Obama is terminating the pigeons as a warning to all pigeon fanciers.

ISIS Executes Pigeon and Bird Breeders in Diyala, Iraq ...

www.nbcnews.com/.../isis-executes-pigeon-bird-breeders-... NBCNews.com Jan 17, 2015 - Raising doves and pigeons is a deadly pursuit in ISIS-controlled Iraq.

The popular hobby is in the sights of extremist Islamist fighters

34 posted on 02/09/2015 8:42:08 PM PST by spokeshave (He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Squab Swab


35 posted on 02/09/2015 9:02:48 PM PST by bunkerhill7 (re (`("The Second Amendment has no limits on firepower"-NY State Senator Kathleen A. Marchione.")))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doorgunner69

Video says the missile was guided by the F-18.

Doubt it. F-18’s a chase plane, to watch missile, and shoot it down if it goes rogue.

This Tomahawk variant would be worthless if it needed an F-18 to guide it to a ship target. F-18 would get shot down.

PS. They called it Unclassified. I wouldn’t have. But they are hard up for successful bragging events. There is still valuable information in these video clips.


36 posted on 02/09/2015 9:08:16 PM PST by Scrambler Bob (/s /s /s /s /s, my replies are "liberally" sprinkled with them behind every word and letter.!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Scrambler Bob
You may be right that the video caption was wrong. Not like the Tomahawk needs help, but with the Harpoon, what was the point?

Very similar airframes, far different missions, unless this was a demonstration of what you can do when you run out of Harpoons?

Just be careful which warheads you are sending over to those ships, could get dicey with the crowd-pleasers.

37 posted on 02/09/2015 9:14:19 PM PST by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

What war?

What date?

(That is one I do not recognize.)


38 posted on 02/09/2015 11:12:56 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: sinsofsolarempirefan

yes. IF the systems always work.

First hit that gets through? Ship can’t fight back.
Or has lost propulsion.
Or has lost missile battery.
or has lost power.
Or is on fire.
or has lost radar.
or has lost the (one) gun that it has.
or has lost the (one) helicopter it can carry.
or has a dud bomb inside the magazine on top of the the missiles down there.


39 posted on 02/09/2015 11:16:17 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

Rigth.

now look at your answers.

Liberty ship. Able to survive. Kept sailing. Not much of a fighter (it was a very, very simple merchant vessel really) but that proves my point. it was NOT a destroyer.

Brit Brilliant?

Out of action for one day, then could fight back 2 days later. Didn’t get a second attack the next 30 minutes, did it?

Argonaut?

No missile battery. Cannononly available - but only after 4-6 hours of recovery after the dud hit.

The duds were inside their rocket magazine as you pointed out. Further, they DIDN’T even explode, and they put her out of action for several hours. What if the Argentine’s knew how to arm their fuzes?

Remember. The Victory, Monitor, and Merrimack could only shoot iron cannonballs too.

Which we conveniently didn’t tell them were going to dud-out their low-level bombs?

7 MORE Brit destroyers would be blown in half.


40 posted on 02/09/2015 11:23:13 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson