Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What various polls say about winners and losers of the first GOP debates (Bad news for Rupert/Jeb)
Examiner ^ | 8/7/15 | Jack Dennis

Posted on 08/07/2015 12:59:36 PM PDT by jimbo123

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
To: jimbo123

This is the election where the people will finally refuse to let the Republican establishment shove the RINO candidate down our throats. We will have a conservative in 2016.


21 posted on 08/07/2015 1:19:45 PM PDT by FrdmLvr ("WE ARE ALL OSAMA, 0BAMA!" al-Qaeda terrorists who breached the American compound in Benghazi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FrdmLvr

22 posted on 08/07/2015 1:21:18 PM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Not to mention he has a lot of money to lose if people won’t use his poll tested answers. Trump told him to pack sand.


23 posted on 08/07/2015 1:21:42 PM PDT by bray (Cruz to the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Gosh. If they keeping attacking Trump, it won’t be long until he has a thousand percent of the votes. lol...


24 posted on 08/07/2015 1:22:17 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

These don’t appear to be scientific polls. They appear to be unscientific online polls that are utterly meaningless.

Trump handled the debate pretty well, but he certainly didn’t double his support which stood around 25% in polls of Republican voters. The very fact that these polls show that tells you precisely how meaningless they are.

We will know over the next few days of scientific polling how the candidates fared - not from this click bait gibberish.


25 posted on 08/07/2015 1:23:28 PM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123; All
That’s why the media isn’t reporting any of their own polls on who won.

Such poll “results” probably “estimated” before debate started.

26 posted on 08/07/2015 1:23:29 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Website polls? Umm, OK.


27 posted on 08/07/2015 1:25:29 PM PDT by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Trump sucked. But I understand the polling. A large majority of eighties have had it with media, eunuch Republicans and the Chamber of Commerce. But Cruz, Rubio and Fiorina are much smarter and fluent on the issues. I wanted Trump to be good so he could carry the ball on illegals and the economy but as hard as I tried I could not overlook his praise of single payer in Canada and Sweden.


28 posted on 08/07/2015 1:25:52 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirit2012

In 2008 he was described as an: “obese guy with good software”

Nothing has changed except his utter corruption.


29 posted on 08/07/2015 1:25:56 PM PDT by Eddie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969

“We will know over the next few days of scientific polling how the candidates fared”

No, we know the next day. People either get a bump or they sink. This isn’t decades ago, people can and do react in real time through multiple channels.


30 posted on 08/07/2015 1:26:03 PM PDT by proust (Hillary has dropped out of more races than Trump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: proust
No, we know the next day. People either get a bump or they sink. This isn’t decades ago, people can and do react in real time through multiple channels.

Polls are typically taken over a 3-day period. So, the first polls that fully reflect the standing after the debate won't come out for a few days.

31 posted on 08/07/2015 1:27:43 PM PDT by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: proust

Sure, but we need to see scientific polls to know that. I don’t know of any post debate scientific polls yet.

The polls in this thread are unscientific online clickbait. They are not real polls.


32 posted on 08/07/2015 1:27:50 PM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

You would have sucked.

The story is he fighting for America against all odds.

THE FIGHT is what’s important.


33 posted on 08/07/2015 1:27:50 PM PDT by Eddie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Scott Walker got 5 minutes in the 2 hour debate less than half of what Trump and way under what the eight of the others got. His questions were loaded, especially abortion question which should have been asked of all the candidates. Mothers or next of kin never have a choice of aborting a baby or losing the life of the mother. Walker answered in a way that was misunderstood by the moderators. With modern medicine today this never happens. I don not think the powers that be at Fox like the Governor they are afraid he might win.


34 posted on 08/07/2015 1:28:07 PM PDT by RightLady (Walker's my Man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eddie01

To you maybe. I prefer a conservative with some core principles that do not include single payer, being a democrat because you live in New York and having late term epiphanies on killing babies. But hey, to each his own.


35 posted on 08/07/2015 1:31:19 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: RightLady

“Scott Walker got 5 minutes in the 2 hour debate”

Pretty much each time he answered, he had time left over and he didn’t use it. His fault.


36 posted on 08/07/2015 1:31:44 PM PDT by proust (Hillary has dropped out of more races than Trump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: MAKOTHEDOG

The moderators were so bad that none of the candidates appeared like losers. The only losers were the moderators.


37 posted on 08/07/2015 1:31:55 PM PDT by Jane Austen (Recall Gov. Nikki Haley, aka Nimrata Randhawa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

I think much of this is condemnation of the moderators/media as much as it is support for Trump.


38 posted on 08/07/2015 1:32:34 PM PDT by Amntn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

Cruz!


39 posted on 08/07/2015 1:34:46 PM PDT by Eddie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Eddie01

He thought he was fighting for American when he supported single payer healthcare, was completely pro abortion, considered himself a Democrat, gave gobs of money to liberals, had glowing things to say about Hillary Clinton, called Bush “evil”, and thought Obama fixed the economy.

You know that wasn’t so long ago. But I guess the Trumpsters don’t care that he has now “evolved” (his own words) recently and claims to have morphed into a conservative.

This is just cult of personality stuff. Trump is fighting for himself and will do whatever he needs to do at any given time to further his ambitions.

Saying that, I still think Trump did pretty well in the debate and probably didn’t lose much if any ground. Luntz’s focus group thing is a stupid exercise is narrative creating group think.


40 posted on 08/07/2015 1:36:07 PM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson