Posted on 10/25/2015 1:30:00 PM PDT by smoothsailing
She is pure evil but she answers to the President who is also pure evil.
I think so. I think Obama and Hillary are both responsible and they were up to no good and that is why they wanted to keep everything top secret around the Benghazi compound. First they start a war against Khadafi who had been stable for many years, then Obama wants to start a war with Assad. It is like he had a wish list—first take out Mubarrak, then Khadafi, then Assad, all within just a few years, but look the other way when the people of Iran were trying to throw out their mullah dictators.
Obama certainly had big plans, of course he isn’t telling us what they were.
Sorry, but it seems that Amb Stevens was tortured to death. IIRC, the terrorists put out pictures all over Arab Media.
I think you need to have a conscience to be haunted by your criminality.
Part of her job was to provide security.
From what I saw when I was watching the hearing off and on was she did not do her JOB.
Apparently, she thinks her job is to travel, stuff her face, drink like she’s at a frat party and arrange hits.
Hopefully she won’t be elected and maybe we can be shed of that succubus they call Secretary.
Ambassador Stevens sent 2 requests per day for over 8 months to this treasonous bitch, and she blames him for not “doing something”.
By the way, she is LYING when she claims she read none of those messages.
I guess anything is possible. I mean, OJ did finally end up in jail even though his criminal trial jury didn’t care that he murdered two people.
I find the alleged support for Hillary a mystery - best explanation I have found is that MSM loves her. She has accomplished nothing, there are scandal after scandal, she lacks charisma, she is a pathological liar and greedy, her health might be poor, etc. For those pushing somebody on the left, there are other leftist who are more intelligent and not such frauds. Then there is her big-eyes, mouth wide open expressions. I just cannot stand to listen to her manner of speaking.
” in which he died of smoke inhalation. “
HUH? you mean after he was beaten to a pulp by terrorists.
Obviously they continue to distort his murder.
And Christopher Stevens was “gay.”
Hillary is such a homophobe. Say it loud and often.
This gets the nom as the "NAILS-IT" Quote Of The Year:
KYLE SMITH/NYP/10/26/15 : "2008 Hillary asserted she was the
candidate best equipped to take a 3 AM phone call. What she didn’t
tell us was that her number would be unlisted."
(Made with reference to Hillary's sworn testimony at the Benghazi
hearing that murdered Amb Stevens did not have her phone no.)
==========================================
Hillary's testimony, rife w/ audacious lies, obfuscations, and willful omissions of fact, was transparently self-serving and covered the gamut of her official govt activities that undermined US ntl security:
She stammered a bit when admitting her employee, Amb Stevens, had no way of reaching her.....realizing she was caught in a huge lie. She had earlier characterized Amb Stevens as "someone she knew and respected," relating personal anecdotes that suggested "a close relationship" and that "she had personally asked him to take the job."
===============================================
"Compassionate" Hillary shut out American men and women on the front lines of dangerous places like Libya. They had to wade thru red tape----and still could not reach Her Highness as the specter of terrorism loomed.
==================================================
Significantly, longtime Clinton errand boy, Sidney Blumenthal, was in constant contact w/ her — as Blumenthal pushed for all-out war in Libya to topple Khadafi. The "new" Libyan govt was Blumenthal's pathway to profit.
Americans were not told Blumenthal was the hired hand of businesses w/ Libyan interests. With the buck-raking Clintons getting a cut.
The double-dealing Clinton Foundation had hyped Blumenthal as their $325, 000 hire "to advance Bill Clinton's presidential legacy."
(waiting for hysterical laughter to subside)
Excellent post.
I just want ONE question answered. WHY did they immediately come up with that video story and spread it so fast and, ahem, furiously? They could have just said they messed up, miscalculated security needs... Why was there a desperate need to come up immediately with the video story?
One reason may have been the election. And indeed, being attacked and losing Americans in a new terrorist attack might have cost him the election. If that had been the story.
But was there more than that? What else was going on? I wish SOMEONE would have dared ask her, “Why did the admin feel the need to lie to the American people about the cause of the attack? And dear Gd, why did you personally lie to the mothers as their sons were returned to them in pine boxes?
Yes, I found your use of the word "woman" in reference to that terrible lying Bitch to be an improper use of language.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.