Some of us have been preaching against the evils of the judicial supremacist lie for a very long time. So, it is gratifying to see a couple of the candidates begin to get on board.
However, in the case of Senator Cruz, I would also ask him a couple probing questions in this regard:
1. Why does your proposed constitutional amendment on marriage not require the states to only recognize one man one woman marriage?
2. If the Supreme Court does not make law, will you ignore Roe vs. Wade as well, and use the power of the EXECUTIVE branch to provide equal protection to EVERY person, as the Fifth and the Fourteenth Amendment explicitly and imperatively REQUIRE?
“Why does your proposed constitutional amendment on marriage not require the states to only recognize one man one woman marriage.”
In my opinion, when he says this:
‘If you care about an issue, how about convincing your brothers and sisters, convincing your neighbors, convincing 320 million Americans, win at the ballot box. That’s called democracy.’
It is because he believes that state recognized ‘gay marriage’ would be legitimate as long as state legislatures or state referendums are the mechanism the state uses to accept ‘gay marriage’ for itself. Which would mean 50 state ‘gay marriage’ recognition inevitably in 20-25 years or so, at least if the trend of the popular votes continue.
Freegards