Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/04/2016 11:57:02 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind

Did you ever think that Barry might just have some secret stock in gun companies? Stranger things have happened.


2 posted on 01/04/2016 11:59:10 AM PST by rfreedom4u (Islam is a cult of hatred and sexual deviants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Dang !!!!

I joked that I should by a bunch of them, and didn’t.

Too late?

Maybe still not???


3 posted on 01/04/2016 11:59:21 AM PST by Scrambler Bob (Using 4th keyboard due to wearing out the "/" and "s" on the previous 3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Hussein should disarm his SS as an example.


5 posted on 01/04/2016 12:04:18 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Why do many seem to interchange the terms Executive Orders vs Executive Actions? This article uses both terms for the same anticipated Presidential proclamation.


6 posted on 01/04/2016 12:05:25 PM PST by yadent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Where’s the plot of 22LR ammo sales?


7 posted on 01/04/2016 12:06:15 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

We have some SWHC. It’s done fine, we bought many years ago when it was down near $3. I expected it to rise today because Obama was making a statement about guns. When they talk about restricting guns, the stock always seems to go up. I wasn’t expecting quite this strong a performance today.


8 posted on 01/04/2016 12:20:47 PM PST by Dawn53Fl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind; All
From a related thread . . .

Patriots please note that the Supreme Court had clarified in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer that executive orders do not have the force of law unless legislatively supported by Congress, provided that such legislation is also reasonably justifiable under Congresss constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers. So what is going on with Obamas unconstitutional unilateral executive orders is the following imo.

Noting that Congress has the constitutional authority to stop lawless Obama from stealing legislative branch powers to make unconstitutional executive orders, please consider the following. Pro-gun control RINO lawmakers are wrongly letting Obama do their dirty legislative work for them so that they can keep their voting records clean. And keeping their voting records clean will help gun-control lawmakers to be reelected this year.

Note that Congress also lets activist justices and non-elected federal bureaucrats steal legislative branch powers so that justices and bureucrats can likewise do Congresss dirty work for it so that lawmakers can keep their voting records clean for reelection purposes.

Remember in November !

When patriots elect Trump, or whatever conservative they elect as president, they also need to do this. They need to elect a new, state sovereignty-respecting Congress that will work within its constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers to support the new president, while prohibiting the corrupt executive and judicial branches, along with Constitution-ignoring federal bureaucrats, from stealing legislative branch powers.

Also consider that such a Congress would probably be willing to fire state sovereignty-ignoring activist justices.

10 posted on 01/04/2016 12:45:31 PM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
 photo OGunSalesmanOfDecade_zpsfi22b85r.jpg
11 posted on 01/04/2016 12:56:49 PM PST by HotHunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson