See how I manged to phrase that without using personal attacks? Try it some time.
As for the meat of your argument: I asked for a link before repeating the claim. However Trump’s comments today raise an interesting question: if Brown is supporting Trump, and Brown is pro-choice and a moderate RINO, what does that say about what he sees in Trump? Or, if we are to argue that the host of a fundraiser does not necessarily support the views of a candidate, or expect recompense, can you PLEASE lay off the “Ted Cruz attended fundraisers hosted by gay marriage supporters?†or “Ted Cruz takes donations from the devil (Goldman Sachs)�
Get a clue. Brown is doing a bbq for Cruz right after Trump’s.
Scott Brown hosting ‘No BS Backyard BBQs’ for Donald Trump, Ted Cruz
http://www.masslive.com/politics/index.ssf/2016/01/scott_brown_hosting_no_bs_back.html
Kindly read all of that paragraph you quoted. It’s called juxtapositional argument. Propose an obviously flawed position and then dismantle that position while also dismantling a similarly phrased argument from the opposition.