this story is poorly told.
a plea to fellow FReepers and fellow Republicans.
Please stop using the term ‘land grab’,
when the Federal gov’t transfers
land from itself to itself,
such as from a national forest
to a national monument.
thanks.
There’s a big difference between national forests and national monuments.
I’m not expert but I know I can hunt, cut firewood and Christmas trees, run livestock and secure logging contracts on (some) national forests.
My understanding is that a national monument is more akin to a wilderness designation—in other words far more restrictive in what uses the land can be put to.
Am I wrong?
I didn’t know the Hammond’s ranch was FedMob land.