Posted on 02/15/2016 1:31:23 PM PST by HomerBohn
If Newsweek's goal was to spark controversy with its Obama-bashing cover article, then the error-riddled piece was certainly a success.
August 21, 2012
This week, Newsweek came under an onslaught of criticism for publishing a cover story titled: "Hit the road, Barack: Why we need a new president." (See an image at right and below.) Written by conservative historian Niall Ferguson, a Harvard professor who served as an adviser to the John McCain campaign in 2008, the story is a litany of complaints against Obama, blasting him for his poor economic stewardship, fiscal irresponsibility, broken promises, and foreign policy weakness.
The problem? The article is riddled with so many errors and misrepresentations that it prompted scores of corrections and complaints from other publications.
Rival magazine The Atlantic even conducted a full fact-check of the article — an embarrassment for a venerable magazine like Newsweek. Indeed, the struggling weekly all but admitted that it no longer has a fact-checking department, saying, "We, like other news organizations today, rely on our writers to submit factually accurate material." Ferguson's piece is the latest attention-grabbing cover to emerge from Newsweek under the editorship of Tina Brown (who also runs Newsweek's online partner The Daily Beast), and she was also criticized for a recent piece slamming Mitt Romney as a "wimp." Has Newsweek lost its credibility?
No. Newsweek is simply publishing a diversity of opinion: As a mainstream magazine that recently published a "pretty aggressive anti-Romney" story, Newsweek "should publish anti-Obama cover stories, too," says Michael Tomasky at The Daily Beast. "We should cultivate, and cater to, Republican readers as well as Democratic ones." There is "something fun and vibrant about a publication wherein the principal voices have at one another." But of course, "the attacks ought to be factual."
"On Niall Ferguson"
Yes. The article is plain wrong: Ferguson is perfectly within his rights to oppose Obama's re-election, but he's "deliberately misleading readers," says Paul Krugman at The New York Times. In an egregious example, he suggests that Obama's health care overhaul added $1.2 trillion to the deficit, when the Congressional Budget Office clearly shows that ObamaCare reduces the deficit.
"We're not talking about ideology or even economic analysis here — just a plain misrepresentation of the facts, with an august publication letting itself be used to misinform readers." Newsweek should issue an "abject correction."
"Unethical commentary, Newsweek edition"
Newsweek has sacrificed integrity for clicks: "If Newsweek's goal was to spark some conversation," then Ferguson's cover story "is a smashing success," says Steve Benen at The Maddow Blog.
The article is "generating far more interest than the magazine's pieces usually do," and is probably getting a lot of clicks. "If, however, Newsweek's goal is to strengthen its reputation, and gain new respect as a major news outlet, Ferguson's cover story marks an ignominious low for the once-great magazine, tarnishing the publication's reputation in ways likely to do lasting, irreparable harm." Newsweek's latest article "isn't journalism; it's a joke." "Where political journalism must not go"
Full disclosure: Sir Harold Evans, editor-at-large of The Week, is married to Tina Brown, editor-in-chief of Newsweek and The Daily Beast.
A more worthless piece of crap you'll search far and wide to find.
Is Newsweek going to replace Fox? lol
All the additional people on Medicaid, but of course we're spending less as a nation.
This was a correction? Really?
Newsweek? The magazine that had the blasphemous cover a few years ago Obama God of All Things
http://www.coverjunkie.com/new-covers/2785
Newsweek has to run a piece critical of Democrats once every few decades to maintain their reputation for objectivity.
This is from 2012? What is the relevance today?
Something to do with their trying to maintain their credibility. I imagine its also has a kind of cathartic effect, as well.
Old article from The Week, whoever they are. Publishing Nial Fergusson may have been an attempt to gain some credibility. Too little, too late.
It’s from 2012, right?
If Newsweak wanted even a shred of credibility they would have exposed Ubama for the failure he is years ago.
But with another one likely in the can my theory is a bit less relevant.
Tina Brown...LOL
She is just sending a shot across the bow that it is Hillary’s Turn.
Yes, it’s easy enough to tell him to hit the road when he has to anyway. Where were these brave warriors five years ago?
Hit the road Barack and don't come back no moe, no moe, no moe, no moe!
I’d never heard of Ferguson, so I did a search on him.
Maybe the most notable part of his biography is that he is married to Ayaan Hirsi Ali (married in 2011 after a divorce from his previous wife that same year).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niall_Ferguson
. In an egregious example, he suggests that Obama’s health care overhaul added $1.2 trillion to the deficit, when the Congressional Budget Office clearly shows that ObamaCare reduces the deficit.
Quit reading right there. Just wow.
Your point in posting an article from 2012?
Why don’t you try reading some of his work?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.