OK— good definition. Now we conservatives should realize how our “institutional” leaders have lost the moral high ground, for example the spinning of the “14th Amendment” wording to say if one is born here you instantly become a citizen.
That is, and agree with you— simply NOT in the Amendment. The Amendment was directed at former slaves being emancipated. But for libs to pick this to mean ANYONE born here, from foreign parent visitors etc....and for supposed Republican “conservatives” (basking in their Lincolnian glory of “winning” the Civil War to impart Radical Republican agenda in this Amendment and Reconstruction)to agree with them is criminal.
A principled conservative who is a leader and not authoritarian would be a rare thing to find indeed. It is the authoritarianism that people dislike. In obamaumao it is marxist fascist dictatorship and malignant narcisissm. Our stupid electorate will jump on the next swing of the pendulum, contrived as conservatism. And Hillary would be a disaster of corruption and filthy perversion.
Leave you with an Orwell quote: “The real division is not between conservatives and revolutionaries but between authoritarians and libertarians.”
Here is an excellent article regarding anchor babies. Technically Rubio is not qualified to be President. This has to be finalized.
http://www.federalistblog.us/2007/09/revisiting_subject_to_the_jurisdiction/