“If done right, I agree.”
If “being done right” means exposing malicious, hateful,
biased writing that involves insidious and libelous assertions without any basis, than what’s wrong with suing an adolescent punk for being a lying mouthpiece for a revolutionary point of view?
Just asking.
IMHO
I think this revolutionary movement is good. It’s an opinion. (he’s simply wrong)
This candidate did this. States a fact. (He didn’t.)