Without calumny or detraction, will the candidates' supporters have any remaining tools to advance their respective candidates such as issues analysis, advancement of the candidate by emphasis on his policy virtues or track record for personal unforced charity or have all of those been discarded by the wayside in favor of an unseemly emotional self-indulgence?
In other news, while the slimefest rolls on, a Roman Catholic priest (an ordained Christian clergyman, Father Frank) has been crucified by practitioners of the extreme version of "the religion of peace" for refusing to abandon his faith in Jesus Christ to help the nutcases to "celebrate" Good Friday. There was no comment from the White Mosque lest Obozo be the cause of people forgetting the Crusades and/or the Inquisition. Comrade Granny also had no comment. Nor did Comrade Grandpa (Sanders or Clinton).
If either The Donald or Ted Cruz or even John Kasich had anything to say as to the crucifixion of Father Frank, perhaps that would be a good starting point for the continuing of their respective campaigns. What, if anything, has each said in response to that crucifixion? What should be the American response to such attacks on the essence of Western Civilization? Specifically, what does each candidate intend to DO about such abominations as POTUS.
While we are at it, what does Bergoglio have to say? He seems too preoccupied with the goings on in Pakistan or "global warming" or what he hallucinates are the evils of capitalism (anything but actual traditional Catholic religion) to notice publicly the death of a martyred priest and speak out on behalf of the Church and bear witness to the heroic courage of Fr. Frank?