Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Clinton just overturned Roe vs. Wade
TomHoefling.com ^ | 4/3/2016 | Tom Hoefling

Posted on 04/03/2016 2:08:29 PM PDT by EternalVigilance

For decades we've heard Republicans and Democrats tell us that we have to somehow "overturn Roe vs. Wade" in order to stop the abortion holocaust.

In the first place, there's nothing to "overturn." Roe was not a law. It was an arbitrary, unconstitutional, lawless court opinion delivered by a handful of oath-breaking, unprincipled, usurping judges -- men who have all already gone on to meet the Supreme Judge of the Universe to explain exactly why they did what they did. Their mere opinion, in one particular case, which opened the door to one of the largest mass murders in human history, is, and always has been, completely null and void, by every natural law, constitutional principle upon which this republic was founded.

However, even by the corrupt standards of the decision itself, the decision has already been overturned.

By whom?

By the current leader of the pro-abortion forces in this country, Hillary Clinton.

From the written opinion itself:

"The appellee and certain amici argue that the fetus is a 'person' within the language and meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment...If this suggestion of personhood is established, the appellant's case, of course, collapses, for the fetus' right to life would then be guaranteed specifically by the Amendment."

-- Justice Harry A. Blackmun, Roe vs. Wade, 1973

That's right. Roe turned completely on whether or not the unborn child is a person.

And yesterday, Hillary Clinton finally faced up to the truth of the matter and established that indeed, the unborn child is a person.

"The unborn person doesn't have constitutional rights," she said. (VIDEO)

"No person shall be deprived of life without due process of law."

"No State shall deprive any person of life without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

-- The Constitution of the United States

In fact, if they are a person, as she now admits to be the case, they do have God-given, unalienable, constitutional rights. End of the story. Even the infamous Blackmun court admitted as much.


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; US: Arkansas; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 2016election; abortion; arkansas; clinton; deathpanels; election2016; hillary; hillaryclinton; hitlery; newyork; obamacare; plannedparenthood; prolife; roe; stemexpress; wipewater; zerocare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: EternalVigilance

“The unborn person doesn’t have any constitutional rights.”

Let’s change one word and see how they like it.

The black person doesn’t have any constitutional rights.
The homosexual person doesn’t have any constitutional rights.
The female person doesn’t have any constitutional rights.
The Democrat person doesn’t have any constitutional rights.
The Hispanic person doesn’t have any constitutional rights.

Hmmmmm.....


21 posted on 04/03/2016 4:32:29 PM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
You're absolutely right! It is the natural progression of imagined consequence-free hedonism. Little do they realize that along with this living for pleasure lifestyle, any respect for other people's lives and rights are sacrificed on the altar of self. Only when the hedonist becomes the victim, does the utter futility and emptiness get realized - if it ever does.
22 posted on 04/03/2016 4:42:23 PM PDT by boatbums (God is ready to assume full responsibility for the life wholly yielded to Him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Under democrats regular born people have less and less constitutional rights.


23 posted on 04/03/2016 5:36:28 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6

That’s exactly right.


24 posted on 04/03/2016 5:43:01 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

Democrats AND Republicans.

Which is, of course, the inevitable result of the deprivation of the supreme God-given, unalienable rights of the children.

If a politician or judge won’t protect helpless little boys and girls, they won’t protect YOUR rights either.


25 posted on 04/03/2016 5:45:50 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; Steve Schulin; BlackElk

Ping...


26 posted on 04/03/2016 5:46:34 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Amen. Yes, she did, but nothing will happen because a large section of America likes its abortion.


27 posted on 04/03/2016 8:34:54 PM PDT by Pinkbell (Liberal tolerance only extends to people they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

“The number of kids being killed and flushed down the toilet is known only to God.”

Unfortunately, you are right. I strongly believe in a woman’s right to choose...whether or not to have sex. After she makes that decision, she has the OBLIGATION to accept the consequences, and to deal with those consequences in a manner that doesn’t involve taking an innocent life.


28 posted on 04/04/2016 1:44:41 PM PDT by Gideon300
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson