Posted on 04/06/2016 4:22:56 PM PDT by drewh
Texas Sen. Ted Cruz may be getting another wave of scandals flooding his presidential bid very soon.
New allegations have arisen that Cruz’s phone number may be on the former District of Columbia madam’s escort service contact list, known as the “black book,” according to a report by the London Telegraph.
The D.C. madam Deborah Palfrey, who killed herself in 2008 after being convicted of racketeering and money laundering, maintained a black book that allegedly contains 15,000 pages of phone records. When the escort service was operating, a night with a prostitute would cost about $300 an hour.
Palfrey’s attorney Montgomery Sibley is attempting to get the black book released in full ahead of the 2016 election, telling the National Enquirer that “time is of the essence,” and that the contact list is “relevant to voters before they cast their ballot.”
Specifically, Cruz is mentioned by investigators as most likely being on the contact list inside the little black book.
“If Montgomery Sibley has what he says he has, it has to be Cruz,” said a reporter who helped investigate Palfrey’s case years ago. “Going on what I know about the other male candidates still in the race, it isn’t any of them, and Palfrey didn’t provide call boys, so it wasn’t Hillary.”
Another investigator who saw the archive told the National Enquirer he would “remember if Bernie Sanders or Trump or John Kasich were in the list. The only name I would not have recognized at the time was Cruz.”
The courts have already denied Sibley’s motion to release the contents of the D.C. madam’s black list.
Last month, BizPac Review reported the allegations made against Cruz in which he is accused by the National Enquirer of having affairs with five women, including Trump’s spokeswoman Katrina Pierson and CNN commentator Amanda Carpenter.
“Has to be” vs. “Is”.... is the difference from rumor to fact.
Call boys for Hilliary? Lol
I doubt very highly that the SCOTUS will allow those records to be opened, there are too many big names (means contributors) on that list that would be exposed. For now, we can only assume the names are on such list until proven to be factual.
Not confirmed. “has to be” is wishful thinking on the part of those who would support someone who would go after an evangelist:
I would be very disappointed and surprised if any of this sordid stuff is true...and it takes a lot for a politician to disappoint me as I don’t expect much in the first place. Either way, as a single issue voter, I am looking for the closest thing to a strict-constructionist as I can find. I’ll pull the lever for Cruz whenever he is on my ballot.
Going for crossover Democrats.
gateway pundit said they were dropped yesterday... go to work Freepers! http://pastebin.com/1HJP7QYU
Well the Enquirer story was pretty much proved by the Amanda and Cruz matching tats with Amanda wearing Cruz’s sports coat in her selfie. So it’s not too much of a stretch for Cruz to be client #10.
I thought she required dark haired carpet munchers who swoon at how tiny she is, and how beautiful she was....
LOL...
Well, that certainly is good enough for the FR Trump echo chamber.
That's how you know this is bad reporting. Hillary would have been calling for the girls.
Yeah, as long as "pretty much proved" means "no proof whatsoever". Including her denial that it happened.
at least Mr Trump wasn’t flying her across state lines for sex work... so far as I know! https://avengersocial.wordpress.com/2016/03/26/interview-with-a-candy-wrapper-the-lollipop-edition/
Just like poker.. until the pot big before you flash your old cards and you need to call to win
She loathes him.
This photo tells it all (look at his eyes).
Depends what the definition of has to be has to be.
Or something like that.
You must have experienced being loathed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.