Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ted Cruz’s Phone Number ‘Has To Be’ On DC Madam’s Client List, Tabloid Says
Biz Pac Review ^ | John Binder 5 hours ago | April 6, 2016

Posted on 04/06/2016 4:22:56 PM PDT by drewh

Texas Sen. Ted Cruz may be getting another wave of scandals flooding his presidential bid very soon.

New allegations have arisen that Cruz’s phone number may be on the former District of Columbia madam’s escort service contact list, known as the “black book,” according to a report by the London Telegraph.

The D.C. madam Deborah Palfrey, who killed herself in 2008 after being convicted of racketeering and money laundering, maintained a black book that allegedly contains 15,000 pages of phone records. When the escort service was operating, a night with a prostitute would cost about $300 an hour.

Palfrey’s attorney Montgomery Sibley is attempting to get the black book released in full ahead of the 2016 election, telling the National Enquirer that “time is of the essence,” and that the contact list is “relevant to voters before they cast their ballot.”

Specifically, Cruz is mentioned by investigators as most likely being on the contact list inside the little black book.

“If Montgomery Sibley has what he says he has, it has to be Cruz,” said a reporter who helped investigate Palfrey’s case years ago. “Going on what I know about the other male candidates still in the race, it isn’t any of them, and Palfrey didn’t provide call boys, so it wasn’t Hillary.”

Another investigator who saw the archive told the National Enquirer he would “remember if Bernie Sanders or Trump or John Kasich were in the list. The only name I would not have recognized at the time was Cruz.”

The courts have already denied Sibley’s motion to release the contents of the D.C. madam’s black list.

Last month, BizPac Review reported the allegations made against Cruz in which he is accused by the National Enquirer of having affairs with five women, including Trump’s spokeswoman Katrina Pierson and CNN commentator Amanda Carpenter.


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: cruz; has2beortrumploses; justhas2be; lyindonald; madam; sleazydonald; trumpsleaze; trumptrojan4hillary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last
To: drewh

And they wonder why good people don’t want to go into politics.


21 posted on 04/06/2016 4:39:50 PM PDT by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LowOiL
Yeah, as long as "pretty much proved" means "no proof whatsoever". Including her denial that it happened.

So the pictures were "fake"?

I'd call that real good evidence.

22 posted on 04/06/2016 4:40:55 PM PDT by AmusedBystander (The philosophy of the school room in one generation will be the philosophy of government in the next)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido
Heheh.

Now Larry...don't project.

23 posted on 04/06/2016 4:41:26 PM PDT by RoosterRedux (When a man loves cats, I am his friend and comrade, without further introduction. - Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

:-)


24 posted on 04/06/2016 4:41:46 PM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido

Back at’cha.


25 posted on 04/06/2016 4:42:36 PM PDT by RoosterRedux (When a man loves cats, I am his friend and comrade, without further introduction. - Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: AmusedBystander

/////Well the Enquirer story was pretty much proved by the Amanda and Cruz matching tats with Amanda wearing Cruz’s sports coat in her selfie. So it’s not too much of a stretch for Cruz to be client #10.

That was a Halloween event that they ALL put on the Churchill tattoos. If you consider tattoos proof I sure hope you never do jury duty.


26 posted on 04/06/2016 4:44:57 PM PDT by libbylu (Cruz: The truth with a smile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: drewh

Which number is Cruz?

8/24/2005,4:05,PM,HOUSTON,TX,713,366-2265


27 posted on 04/06/2016 4:46:08 PM PDT by E20erer (#AlwaysTrump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: drewh

100 more posts still doesn’t make it true.


28 posted on 04/06/2016 4:46:21 PM PDT by libbylu (Cruz: The truth with a smile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Now that’s only the right eye in that photo... if the left one’s closed...


29 posted on 04/06/2016 4:47:09 PM PDT by ameribbean expat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: kaehurowing

Walker probably was good but he wasn’t strong enough to stay in. Santorum is good but couldn’t get enough votes. Running for president is a tough business. If Cruz did cheat after wanting to be president since fifth grade then he really is stupid to think he wouldn’t get caught.


30 posted on 04/06/2016 4:47:25 PM PDT by napscoordinator (Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: drewh
The time in question that Montgomery Sibley, and his Hustler lawyers are referring to is thus: (From Wikipedia) After graduating from Princeton (1992), Cruz attended Harvard Law School, graduating magna cum laude in 1995 with a Juris Doctor degree.[3][38] While at Harvard Law, he was a primary editor of the Harvard Law Review, and executive editor of the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, and a founding editor of the Harvard Latino Law Review.[32] Referring to Cruz's time as a student at Harvard Law, Professor Alan Dershowitz said, "Cruz was off-the-charts brilliant".[39][40][41][42] At Harvard Law, Cruz was a John M. Olin Fellow in Law and Economics.[43] Busy guy.

This means he was at Princeton until 1992 and then went on to Cambridge Massachusetts, and then in 1996 he was in DC clerking for Mike Luttig and William Rehnquist, then on to working for the NRA, the Justice Department, etc.

Then he moved to Texas and served as TX Solicitor General from 2003 to 2008 and ran for the Senate in 2012.

Deborah Palfrey died three years before Ted Cruz ran for the Senate from Texas.

Someone needs to work up the timeline and get the facts straight.

31 posted on 04/06/2016 4:48:27 PM PDT by Slyfox (Donald Trump's First Principle is the Art of the Deal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libbylu
That was a Halloween event that they ALL put on the Churchill tattoos

What an odd costume.

32 posted on 04/06/2016 4:48:46 PM PDT by AmusedBystander (The philosophy of the school room in one generation will be the philosophy of government in the next)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: AmusedBystander

In your stinking, putrid mind. And ONLY there. It must really suck to be stuck in there with yourself.


33 posted on 04/06/2016 4:49:02 PM PDT by John Valentine ( Deep in the Heart of Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Lol.

I share the sentiment

Ooze deserves all the loathing he is earning


34 posted on 04/06/2016 4:49:34 PM PDT by Gasshog (Stay Tuned for further developments in the CUBAN MISTRESS CRISIS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: AmusedBystander

You and your kind are no better than the Muslim mobs who stone innocent women to death because there was “pretty good evidence” of adultery.

Until you have some proof you need to keep your stones in your pocket. There are innocent people that are being harmed by these spurious rumors. Shame on you for repeating them without a shred of evidence.


35 posted on 04/06/2016 4:50:22 PM PDT by BigBobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: libbylu

It was April Fool’s actually. Notice the date:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cej32l6XEAAUF4K.jpg


36 posted on 04/06/2016 4:50:41 PM PDT by JediJones (The younger presidential candidate has won the popular vote since '92. Vote younger. Vote Cruz. Win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: drewh

It is only a matter of time before it is released, one way or another — Wikileaks?


37 posted on 04/06/2016 4:52:06 PM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh

Did Ted step in it again?

This guy screws up more every day.

All these unforced errors. I’m sure glad I don’t shill for the RNC/GOPe’s pimp.

Well, Ted will get to act like a presidential contender for 13 more days.

Then he will be numerically eliminated.

Then we can flush.


38 posted on 04/06/2016 4:52:20 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Facing Trump nomination inevitability, folks are now openly trying to help Hillary destroy him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

even the sister in law says he’s an adulterer, this is where a nation full of attorneys has gotten us! https://medium.com/@Blackppl4Trump/l-affaire-of-ted-cruz-c1818b9db18f#.q3wfd6rcl


39 posted on 04/06/2016 4:55:38 PM PDT by drewh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: JediJones
Hillary would have been calling for the girls.

And then dumping their lifeless bodies in the DC parks after hours.

40 posted on 04/06/2016 4:56:33 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson