Posted on 04/25/2016 11:33:19 AM PDT by Red Steel
The idea was floated over the weekend by Jon Karl on ABC, as youll see below, and started some conservative tweeters chattering. I think theres more upside to it than downside, but there are downsides.
Cruz needs media oxygen in the next week, a way to have the story not just be Trump's NE sweep. Not a lot of ways to get that.
Ross Douthat (@DouthatNYT) April 25, 2016
Picking a running mate now could limit his dealmaking options at the convention. But first you gotta get to the convention.
Ross Douthat (@DouthatNYT) April 25, 2016
Cruz is going to get blown out again tomorrow night, which raises the question of how he wants to spend the next week ahead of the big vote in Indiana. If he does nothing, hell spend most of his time fielding questions about collusion with John Kasich and whether his wipeout in the northeast proves that the party has come around to Trump. If he names a VP, hell spend most of his time talking about his veep pick and how it fits into his vision for America. Thats a move a would-be nominee makes, not an also-ran. Karl suggests, probably correctly, that Carly Fiorina is the frontrunner. Not only was Fiorina the first former candidate to endorse Cruz, she was the first big name to support him after various Washington Republicans had signed on with Rubio. If Cruz were to name her this week, hed got a ton of buzz for putting a woman on the ticket and Fiorina would instantly be elevated to a super-surrogate who could barnstorm Indiana and other states as a draw in her own right to turn voters out for Cruz. Fiorina was also the most effective attack dog in the field against Trump during the debates. If you wanted someone on the trail on your behalf making the case for why a contested convention, with all the chaos it entails, is a better option than nominating Donald Trump, thats who youd pick. And dont forget the regional play at stake: Fiorina graduated from Stanford and ran for Senate in 2010 in California, by far the most important state left on the board. If she can help Cruz hold Trump down there, thats reason enough to pick her given its role in deciding the eventual nominee. And Fiorina helps in the general election too, of course, blunting Hillarys pitch to women voters. There are lots of advantages in naming her.
So what not do it? The risk you run in naming a VP when youre not the nominee yet is that voters will see it as a stunt, which is what it is, and stunts smell of desperation. Thats extra risky for Cruz given that hes just pulled another stunt in colluding with Kasich in Indiana. Instead of seeing him as more presidential, some voters may view the veep pick as a gimmick by a fading candidate to try to revive his campaign. On top of that, it would limit Cruzs strategic options later. Cruzs chances at the convention may turn on his ability to horse-trade more effectively than Trump. If Trump offers Kasich the VP slot, what does Cruz counter with if that positions already been filled by Fiorina? In fact, notes John McCormack, if youre all about consolidating anti-Trumpers and winning California in June, wouldnt it be smarter for Cruz to offer Kasich the VP slot now? No alliance will unite the two camps voters like that would. And if Kasich wont accept the offer now, wouldnt it be better to wait a few weeks and try again than to appoint someone now in case he becomes more amenable in mid-May? To paraphrase Rod Blagojevich, the vice presidency is a f***ing valuable thing.
I dont think Cruz can wait for Kasich to figure out what he wants, though. Indiana is must-win. If picking someone this week would help win it, do it and worry about Cleveland the day after Indianas in the bag. Exit question: Is there any VP pick who might end up being blocked at the convention? Patrick Ruffini raised that possibility last night in contemplating the possibility of a Trump/Kasich ticket. What if, Ruffini wondered, Kasich made a deal with Trump to endorse him, all but handing him the nomination in exchange for the VP slot, and Cruzs delegates responded by refusing to vote for Kasich for vice president? Remember, theres no such thing as a bound delegate when it comes to the VP race; the delegates can vote for whoever they want. Ttypically the nominees choice is rubber-stamped, but since many (if not a majority) of delegates at the convention will be pro-Cruz, theyd be free to block Kasich even if Trump picked him. In reality, I doubt theyd have the nerve: Having been forced by the rules to nominate Trump on the first ballot, theyd support whoever Trump wanted for vice president before washing their hands of the general election. But they have the power to block if they choose to exercise it.
.@jonkarl says Ted Cruz may name a running mate soon to shake up the raceand he has a guess as to who that might be https://t.co/c7VhTPFe0V
This Week (@ThisWeekABC) April 25, 2016
I saw a Cruz Facebook group had a poll 2 weeks ago and Carly won for the V.P. slot overwhelmingly. I don’t doubt Cruz is hearing from supporters that they would be enthusiastic about a Carly pick.
I think Carly would be a strong choice as Trump’s or Cruz’s V.P. in this race because as a female she softens up their harder-edged image, she fills the V.P. attack dog role against Hillary, she potentially pulls in some women voters who just wanted to vote for a woman in Hillary, and she was a strong pro-life advocate. Her weaknesses are what sunk her in California, namely her business record, but it would be hard to make that a prominent issue under Cruz. With Trump and Carly together, a Big Bad Business narrative could be weaved more easily.
I agree, he has lots of cards missing from his deck.
Thanks for the earlier zots!
http://www.freerepublic.com/~godgunsguts/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~pacificus/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~katwoman5779/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~flfreedom/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~unclericosfootball/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~traditionalmerica
http://www.freerepublic.com/~rwilson99/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~libertytreesurgeon/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~proudpapa/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~durbin/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~bigun/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~tallyhoe/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~jerseyrepub/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~debrawiest/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~libbylu/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~kik5150/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~nervoustick/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~rightlady/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~flintsilver7/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~leto/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~anymouse/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~thedoc/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~publana/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~xspurt/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~hoodat/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~Perdogg/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~dschapin/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~deathrattle/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~kidd/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~laserman/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~lmao/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~zajko/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~wistful/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~WilliamIII/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~kinsmanredeemer/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~responsibility2nd/
So Cruz paid her $500,000 to run?
NO
Looks like
http://www.freerepublic.com/~unclericosfootball/
was a TDS’er, I think.
Were the others rabid Cruzers?
I doubt she would sign on with Ted if she's watching how the Cruz numbers are tanking, I think she'll wait to see if she can do a good audition for Trump.
Also, this article is nuts, there is no way in Hell this kind of maneuver helps Cruz in Indiana. Not one bit.
Thanks.
Yes to your last question.
http://www.freerepublic.com/~godgunsguts/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~pacificus/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~katwoman5779/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~flfreedom/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~unclericosfootball/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~traditionalmerica
http://www.freerepublic.com/~rwilson99/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~libertytreesurgeon/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~proudpapa/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~durbin/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~bigun/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~tallyhoe/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~jerseyrepub/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~debrawiest/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~libbylu/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~kik5150/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~nervoustick/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~rightlady/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~flintsilver7/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~leto/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~anymouse/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~thedoc/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~publana/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~xspurt/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~hoodat/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~Perdogg/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~dschapin/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~deathrattle/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~kidd/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~laserman/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~lmao/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~zajko/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~wistful/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~WilliamIII/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~kinsmanredeemer/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~responsibility2nd/
http://www.freerepublic.com/~unclericosfootball/
They can’t say that JR didn’t give them plenty of warning.
Maybe Ted and Carly can have their own TV show like West Wing: an alternate reality where Ted Cruz actually gets to be president.
Meanwhile, back here in reality, we’ll be going with Trump Kthxbye.
I think I saw one of the others - updated my list; saw another noted it.
Bizarre - all for Ted Cruz - who is showing himself to be sleazy in lots of ways. First the Chicago thing, then the GOPe thing and now he just wants to wreck the voters who are choosing Trump over him.
What a low-life jerk. Enjoy your 15% you’ll probably get tomorrow, Ted, you jerk.
Yes, because self-righteous Ted Cruz fanboys never call anyone names, right?
Apparently, Ted Cruz plans on limping into the GOP convention with, at best, about 700 delegates or so.
And then what's he going to do somehow, magically? He's going to seize the nomination from Donald Trump, displacing the party's clear frontrunner.
Then what? This is the most ridiculous part: after swiping the nomination, he will:
It would be laughable if it wasn't so dangerous.
Ted Cruz appears fully willing to sacrifice his own party, and even the country, on the altar of his own blind personal ambition.
Ted Cruz's egotism and malignant narcissism make Donald Trump's ostensible character deficits pale in comparison.
Vote Trump
Oh drat. I hate when that happens!
< smirk >
Cruznoidia...
Honestly, I don’t trust Tead on the borders issues.
He was helping Bush thwart immigration enforcement clear back in 1999. Not only that, he was helping him develop his “for the children” stances, a Leftist’s vision of how to frame things so the public wouldn’t differ.
He’s always been in the tank on immigration.
His cohorts on FR even with low results will praise his ground game and intelligence.
yep
Title:Study: Trump investments underperformed in 2015
Trump also argued that several of his individual stock picks, like Apple and Goldman Sachs, have done very well for him.
I hit the market exactly perfectly, he said.
http://thehill.com/policy/finance/274178-trump-investments-underperformed-in-2015
Title:Know Who Else Has Received Loans from Citibank and Goldman Sachs? Donald Trump.
Hes made the nonsensical claim repeatedly that Ted Cruz cant protect people from Citibank or Goldman Sachs or whoever, because he has taken out loans from them or
personally guaranteed loans to his campaign from them.
As for Goldman Sachs, Trump is himself a shareholder in Goldman Sachs, which means he has a direct financial interest in its success. One would think that would make Trump even less enthusiastic about protecting me from Goldman Sachs (whatever that means) than Cruz would.
“They cant say that JR didnt give them plenty of warning.”
Then, they acted like loud mouth lawyer thugs and the house rules didn’t apply to them and totally disregarded his requests!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.