Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Latest: Berkshire investors reject climate change report
washingtonpost.com ^ | 4/30/2016 | unknown

Posted on 05/01/2016 7:44:23 AM PDT by rktman

Berkshire Hathaway shareholders have overwhelmingly rejected a resolution calling for the company to write a report about the risks climate change creates for its insurance companies.

CEO Warren Buffett says he agrees that dealing with climate change is important for society, but he doesn’t think climate change creates serious risks for Berkshire’s insurance businesses.

Buffett says the fact that Berkshire generally writes insurance policies for one-year periods allows it to regularly re-evaluate risks, such as climate change.

The activists who proposed the motion tried to urge Buffett to take a public stance in favor of measures to reduce consumption of fossil fuels, but he resisted.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: berkshire; berkshirehathaway; biginsurance; buffett; climatechange; climatechangefraud; epa; globalwarming; globalwarminghoax; popefrancis; romancatholicism; stockholders; warrenbuffett
OVERWHELMINGLY REJECTED! Got that? So maybe there is hope. At least until the next shareholders meeting. Some of the "deniers" may get a "good talking to" before the next one and have their priorities uh, corrected. Yeah, that's it.
1 posted on 05/01/2016 7:44:23 AM PDT by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rktman

Global Warming Insurance ?


2 posted on 05/01/2016 7:50:34 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave

Global warming is only for the little people.


3 posted on 05/01/2016 7:53:09 AM PDT by StAntKnee (Add your own danged sarc tag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rktman
It would make far more sense for them to evaluate the risks and costs associated with governmental increase in taxes and regulations based on whipping up global warming fears.

Government shutting down coal mining is a far greater investment risk to Buffet than an increase in global temperature of 0.1°.

4 posted on 05/01/2016 7:54:00 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (An orange jumpsuit is the new black pantsuit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave

I have to pay for terrorism insurance on my business policy.


5 posted on 05/01/2016 7:57:10 AM PDT by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave
Hey, seems like a pretty good scam with millions of potential customers plus it is endorsed by the elites with no down side for the insurance company.

A win-win.

Then again, every natural disaster is caused by AGW.

6 posted on 05/01/2016 8:05:40 AM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: KarlInOhio

You thinkin’ choo choo trains transporting coal and oil? Yeah, that could hurt the bottom line with a push to phase out the cheapest(?) fuel sources we have.


8 posted on 05/01/2016 8:18:23 AM PDT by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Insurance companies adjust to threats and always have.

When mold became known as a major health issue, insurance companies excluded it from coverage.

Ling-term imaginary weather conditions don’t affect annually written policies unless those conditions are ignored for long periods.


9 posted on 05/01/2016 9:12:59 AM PDT by SaxxonWoods (Ride To The Sound Of The Guns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SaxxonWoods

Whatever happened to the Ozone Hole that the Acid- Rain fell through?


10 posted on 05/01/2016 11:01:41 AM PDT by gigster (Cogito, Ergo, Ronaldus Magnus Conservatus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: gigster
The ozone hole returned bigger than ever. Seems as if the apes eating banana, while swinging from tree branch to tree branch, had absolutely nothing at all to do with the ozone hole. NASA knows this now and refuses to admit its mistake.
11 posted on 05/01/2016 1:25:28 PM PDT by justa-hairyape (The user name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rktman; 11B40; A Balrog of Morgoth; A message; ACelt; Aeronaut; AFPhys; AlexW; alrea; ...
The activists who proposed the motion tried to urge Buffett to take a public stance in favor of measures to reduce consumption of fossil fuels, but he resisted.

Can't have something that interferes with Buffet's oil choo-choos. Not that I would support such a thing, either, but I'm willing to "follow the money."

DOOMAGE!

Global Warming PING!

You have been pinged because of your interest in environmentalism, alarmist wackos, mainstream media doomsday hype, and other issues pertaining to global warming.

Freep-mail me to get on or off: Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to all note-worthy threads on global warming.

Global Warming on Free Republic here, here and here

Latest from Global Warming News Site

Latest from Greenie Watch

Latest from Real Climate

Latest from Climate Depot

Latest from Junk Science

Latest from Terra Daily

12 posted on 05/02/2016 4:00:40 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Stick a fork in America; she's done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

Somebody at or published by the Cato institute actually proposed a private program of insurance against acts of government. It seems like a sensible thing to do nowadays.


13 posted on 05/02/2016 4:05:22 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Stick a fork in America; she's done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Warren the hypocrite stays the course of hypocrisy. Lol.


14 posted on 05/02/2016 4:09:33 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman
I'll bet the SEC or some other regulatory body over publicly traded companies will ultimately start requiring climate change mitigation activities as a condition of listing.
15 posted on 05/02/2016 4:17:53 PM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

16 posted on 05/02/2016 4:26:40 PM PDT by PROCON
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Thanks.


17 posted on 05/02/2016 5:48:25 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Truth29

Some companies already require their suppliers to provide climate change mitigation documentation. So sad that these people have bought the lie hook line and sinker.


18 posted on 05/02/2016 6:17:44 PM PDT by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...
Thanks rktman.

19 posted on 05/03/2016 4:35:15 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson