Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Full-Scale Production of Plutonium Spacecraft Fuel Still Years Away
Space.Com ^ | May 17, 2016 | Mike Wall

Posted on 05/17/2016 6:19:08 PM PDT by Sawdring

The United States has begun manufacturing nuclear spacecraft fuel for the first time in a generation, but full production of the stuff is still seven years or so away.

In December, officials at the Department of Energy's (DOE) Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee announced that researchers at the site had generated a 1.8-ounce (50 grams) sample of plutonium-238, the fuel that powers deep-space missions such as NASA's New Horizons Pluto probe and Cassini Saturn orbiter.

(Excerpt) Read more at space.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: fuel; nasa; nuclearpower; science; spacetravel

1 posted on 05/17/2016 6:19:08 PM PDT by Sawdring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sawdring

OUR TOP STORY TONIGHT:

“Colonizing new planets won’t happen for awhile”


2 posted on 05/17/2016 6:29:28 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Nation States seem to be ending. The follow-on should not be Globalism, but Localism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

50 years ago they could - and did - build reactors for producing the stuff from bare ground to operation in 7 months.


3 posted on 05/17/2016 6:35:07 PM PDT by Royal Wulff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Royal Wulff

now we can pee in a bathroom of our own choosing


4 posted on 05/17/2016 6:39:11 PM PDT by ghosthost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sawdring

We could always use an Orion Drive.


5 posted on 05/17/2016 6:55:32 PM PDT by Redcitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redcitizen

I say we fire up the Omega 13.


6 posted on 05/17/2016 7:03:37 PM PDT by Sawdring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sawdring

The US has been buying the stuff from Russia.


7 posted on 05/17/2016 7:03:48 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

In the article it says the US hasn’t received any since 2010.


8 posted on 05/17/2016 7:06:13 PM PDT by Sawdring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sawdring

It’s usually used in long range probes to the outer solar system like the Pluto Express and Cassini. So it is periodic.


9 posted on 05/17/2016 7:11:05 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sawdring

Let 'er rip.

10 posted on 05/17/2016 7:15:26 PM PDT by Redcitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Are you cutting and pasting stuff out of the article?


11 posted on 05/17/2016 7:16:30 PM PDT by Sawdring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sawdring

No, I actually didn’t read it. LoL.

Plutonium also was likely used in the latest Mars rovers.


12 posted on 05/17/2016 7:18:47 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Royal Wulff
That's plutonium 239, which is relatively easy to produce and can be used to make bombs.

The article is talking about plutonium 238, which is used for radioisotope thermal generators -- its radioactive decay is such that a big enough lump of it glows red hot all the time. We've never had much of a capacity to produce the stuff, and bought a lot of what we used from the Russians.

13 posted on 05/17/2016 8:09:48 PM PDT by Campion (Halten Sie sich unbedingt an die Lehre!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Campion

Pu 238 is a fascinating isotope.
Fairly hard to produce but there is nothing like it.
88 year half-life so it sticks around long enough to get work done.
No serious gamma emissions to worry about killing everyone around it.
If you try and build a bomb out of it, it melts long before you get to critical mass.


14 posted on 05/17/2016 8:59:12 PM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Redcitizen

Nuclear bombs. I remeber reading about this in the late 70s early 80s in Omni.


15 posted on 05/17/2016 10:34:56 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

We coud have had some long range probes of our solar system sooner if we had used the Orion drive or even the ion thrust drive back in the 70s.


16 posted on 05/18/2016 9:35:46 AM PDT by Redcitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Sawdring

17 posted on 05/18/2016 9:37:18 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Campion

I know the difference and stand by my comment.


18 posted on 05/18/2016 10:56:39 AM PDT by Royal Wulff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

I think that movie stokes a lot of imagination when someone sees it.


19 posted on 05/18/2016 11:29:50 AM PDT by Sawdring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson