The research has been done and is compelling. Vaccines save lives. If what you did affected you only, you would have an argument, but other people, especially babies, are at risk from those who are not vaccinated.
>The research has been done and is compelling.
Call to authority fallacy
> Vaccines save lives.
Generalization fallacy.
> other people, especially babies, are at risk from those who are not vaccinated
Unfounded inference.
This is why there are a great many skeptics, because of pro-vax arguments like this. You have zero interest in the concerns of skeptics, and are trying to beat them over the head with fallacies, so naturally you’re going to get blowback and even more skepticism in the wake of such tactics.
I didn’t say vaccines didn’t save lives or are bad. I know they do. I have a medical background, I was merely showing the argument that was prsented Is the same as the climate change “science” and the “science” on gun violence. Are you giving up your car or getting rid of your guns based on the “science”?