To: NoLibZone
That essentially hushes up that source of embarrassment to Hillary. It was either grant him immunity or Arkincide him.
2 posted on
09/08/2016 6:52:52 PM PDT by
BipolarBob
(I'm one big walking chemical reaction..)
To: BipolarBob
Uh, maybe I am missing something here, but isn't the purpose of granting immunity to someone is to ensure that they spill their guts testifying against a bigger fish - not to shut them up?
5 posted on
09/08/2016 6:55:50 PM PDT by
fhayek
To: BipolarBob
You cannot grant immunity for acts against the state or treason from the U.S. Congress.
His grant of immunity would require truthfulness and cooperation too, or the immunity would be void.
I would not want to be him.
23 posted on
09/08/2016 7:17:54 PM PDT by
Bshaw
(A nefarious deceit is upon us all!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson