To: Nachum
Seems to me that if the recount is not completed, the conclusion is that there is no compelling evidence of voter fraud that has been presented...thus, the original count should stand.
5 posted on
12/01/2016 8:23:47 PM PST by
XEHRpa
To: XEHRpa
scotus 2000 precedent is exactly this. it will happen in every state not done in time.
20 posted on
12/01/2016 8:32:16 PM PST by
Secret Agent Man
( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: XEHRpa
Correct. Not that that will calm the Nervous Nellies here.
Worriers gonna worry:)
25 posted on
12/01/2016 8:38:28 PM PST by
Ken H
(Best election ever!)
To: XEHRpa
I agree and I saw this interview. Right before Tucker had to cut the interview the last thing Rep. Duffy said was they may have to go to court. I despise Democrats!!!
32 posted on
12/01/2016 9:20:18 PM PST by
Dawgreg
(Happiness is not having what you want, but wanting what you have.)
To: XEHRpa
Seems to me that if the recount is not completed, the conclusion is that there is no compelling evidence of voter fraud that has been presented...thus, the original count should stand. I think you are right, If stuff like this happens the Governor and state legilslature can get involved and have the last say.
61 posted on
12/02/2016 5:49:40 AM PST by
rodguy911
(Go Sarah go! America home of the free because of the brave.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson