Such utter bullcrap.
The plan affects people YEARS out, who have plenty of time to PLAN for the changes--and it doesn't affect people about to go into the system.
Social Security DIES without reform.
Grab this bull by the testicles, GOP. And win.
To: SoFloFreeper
I guess the next article=fakenews they put out will be...elderly eating dog food.
2 posted on
12/09/2016 5:09:05 PM PST by
ColdOne
(( I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11~ Not tired of winning.)
To: SoFloFreeper; appalachian_dweller; aragorn; Arthur Wildfire! March; ASA Vet; Art in Idaho; ...
PING!!!
Article and comments
From article:
Nearly every income bracket would see a reduction, save for the very bottom. People making around $12,280 in 2016 who have worked for 30 years would see an increase of around 20%. But young people making the same amount would be hit hard by the changes. If they had 14 years of work experience by 2016, they would see their benefits cut in half.
The plan would also cut entirely cost of living adjustments (COLA) for retirees earning above $85,000.
Thanks, SoFloFreeper
3 posted on
12/09/2016 5:12:28 PM PST by
Whenifhow
To: SoFloFreeper
Any piece quoting people from both Center for American Progress and Talking Points Memo is certain to steam in a meadow.
To: SoFloFreeper
First cut welfare, food stamps, Obama-phones and all other handouts to illegal aliens and all able bodied adults.
Then cut retirement benefits for all elected federal officials back to what is normal in the private sector.
5 posted on
12/09/2016 5:14:05 PM PST by
Iron Munro
(If Illegals voted Rebublican 50 Million Democrats Would Be Screaming "Build The Wall!")
To: SoFloFreeper
Paul Ryan doesn’t have a good track record here. Just sayin’.
6 posted on
12/09/2016 5:15:47 PM PST by
lodi90
To: SoFloFreeper
Raising retirement age to 69 is a no go.. Most people work till 60 if they are lucky these days due to layoffs etc..
Plus the odds are you might never see the $$$.
To: SoFloFreeper
Brings to mind the classic joke:
Q. "How many people work at the Social Security Administration headquarters?"
A. "About half of them."
10 posted on
12/09/2016 5:25:18 PM PST by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: SoFloFreeper
***Social Security DIES without reform. ***
But, but we were promised back in 1964!
https://www.ssa.gov/history/ssa/usa1964-2.html
Self-Supporting
“The program is designed so that contributions plus interest on the investments of the social security trust funds will be sufficient to meet all of the costs of benefits and administration, now and into the indefinite future—without any subsidy from the general funds of the Government.
Both the Congress and the Executive Branch, regardless of political party in power, have scrupulously provided in advance for full financing of all liberalizations in the program.”
And HERE is where your money went! Read and weep!
https://www.ssa.gov/OACT/ProgData/fundFAQ.html#n4
11 posted on
12/09/2016 5:27:48 PM PST by
Ruy Dias de Bivar
(Conan: To crush your enemies, and to hear the lamentations of their women)
To: SoFloFreeper
Let's go straight to the source instead of reading Yahoo...
Sam Johnson Unveils Plan to Permanently Save Social Security
Today, Ways and Means Social Security Subcommittee Chairman Sam Johnson (TX-03) introduced legislation that will permanently save Social Security, ensuring this vital program continues to work for todays workers and beneficiaries and future generations.
My, my, my, what a difference a headline makes.
To learn more about Chairman Johnsons Social Security Reform Act of 2016, CLICK HERE.
To read the full bill text, CLICK HERE.
To read the Social Security Actuary letter, CLICK HERE.
13 posted on
12/09/2016 5:30:00 PM PST by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamiin Franklin)
To: SoFloFreeper
#FakeNews. . . it never ends.
14 posted on
12/09/2016 5:43:53 PM PST by
Grampa Dave
(Hey, whining loserers,Trump will just go ahead &the make things better for us without you!!!!")
To: SoFloFreeper
Cancel anything you have with Yahoo!
15 posted on
12/09/2016 5:46:19 PM PST by
Grampa Dave
(Hey, whining loserers,Trump will just go ahead &the make things better for us without you!!!!")
To: SoFloFreeper
I agree.
But, I asked my congressman this...why in the hell can you guys increase to amount a retired person can earn in a part time job, from the early years of retirement, to say, 20 grand a year? That way, they can contribute back into the system at thier part time job.
Answer? None.
16 posted on
12/09/2016 5:53:01 PM PST by
crz
To: SoFloFreeper
SS should be at least privatized and we can do it better than Chile did it and Chile recipients get back about twice what Americans get back as a percentage of input and the money belongs to them from premium to principle. They have money left in their investment to leave to their heirs.
18 posted on
12/09/2016 5:55:26 PM PST by
arthurus
(Mrs Clinton is The Great Conniver.)
To: SoFloFreeper
Why on Earth did this guy not go on Hannity and discuss the program so that everyone hears the truth. Good Lord it has been all over the media and the lies are incredible.
20 posted on
12/09/2016 6:01:27 PM PST by
napscoordinator
(Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016)
To: SoFloFreeper
And coal miners health insurance. I saw on Twitter.
To: SoFloFreeper
GOP, first step is to eliminate welfare to all illegal aliens and non-citizens. Including the earned Income tax credit. SS was looted by the dims under LBJ. That should be at the forefront of the arguments and reasons to reform the SS retirement program (insurance). Also let people know that the government steals all of a persons SS money, contributed to SS, from their surviving family if the principle passes away early. Explain that going forward the money you save for retirement is yours not the governments. No more legalized theft by the democrats. Pubbies be fearless in the fight. Go on the offensive on every front not just SS and illegal alien welfare and make certain the attack comes from an unexpected direction . Shock the dickens out of them so the dims cannot capture and control any narrative. Put them on the defensive and keep them there. I will gladly loan you my spine if you need one.
28 posted on
12/09/2016 7:20:22 PM PST by
Nuc 1.1
(Nuc 1 Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789!)
To: SoFloFreeper
If memory serves it was LBJ (RAT-TX) who signed the bill that changed Socialist Security from a self-sustaining entity to just another funnel for cash to flow into the general fund.
SS has been getting butt-raped ever since.
34 posted on
12/09/2016 8:32:04 PM PST by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standairds at all -- Texas Eagle)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson