We had better get used to killing women and children.
Islamists use them as combatants and bombers all the time.
“...We had better get used to killing women and children...”
You mean those “children” running around with AKs and trained and cutting Christians’ heads off? You meant those children? Not a problem...kill every last one of em and let their little piss-ant god, allah, sort em all out.
There was an article here recently about women with bombs strapped on carrying babies into crowds.
Do I feel bad about the death of their innocent? Of course.
But I’d feel worse (and totally p.o.ed) about the death of innocent here all for more votes for ruling liberal elites.
They have made it clear that they have no problem with human sacrifices for their power. (Chris Stevens Sean Smith, Tyrone Woods, Glenn Doherty and Kate Steinle to name a very, very few.)
NO MORE!
and shields
ISIS kills a thousand civilians a month. 60k over 5 years.
If we could wipe out ISIS with collateral damage of under 60k the world would benefit. Unfortunately, this type of analysis is not allowable... not since we dropped the A bomb.
For the greater good only applies selectively.
Women and children always die in war. When our side kills women and children it is because it was unavoidable. When our enemy kill women and children, it is because they target them on purpose. If they didnt want their women and kids killed in war, then they shouldn’t have started a war. Most of the snowflakes protesting won’t recognize the threat and understand the solution until the power supply to their Facebook and Twitter is vaporized along with half a million Americans.