Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Does Neil Gorsuch's Liberal Church Matter?
Samuel Smith ^ | 2/10/17 | The Christian Post

Posted on 03/26/2017 6:20:46 PM PDT by johnk

However, multiple reports have pointed out that Gorsuch and his wife attend St. John's, Boulder — a liberal Episcopal church headed by a very liberal, pro-LGBT female rector named Rev. Susan Springer.

Opposition to Gorsuch's affiliation with St. John's was voiced even before he was nominated.

Christian conservative activist and lawyer Andy Schlafly, the son of the late pro-life leader Phyllis Schlafly, voiced his concern over the possible nomination of Gorsuch in an email sent in November with the subject line: "veto these Sup. Ct. nominee candidates."

Schlafly wrote that Gorsuch "probably would NOT be pro-life on the Supreme Court" and included him on his list of "unacceptable nominees."

"Gorsuch's Episcopalian church has declared its 'unequivocal opposition' to pro-life laws and he has said nothing publicly pro-life," Schlafly wrote in the email.

Others, including journalist Julia Duin, who previously wrote for the conservative news outlet The Washington Times, have brought up the issue of Gorsuch's membership at St. John's.

"Think about that for a moment. If this man is the frightening conservative that some on the Left are already alleging him to be, there's no way he'd be Episcopalian, much less at a woman-priested church," Duin wrote. "The Episcopal Church, for anyone who's not been following religion trends in recent decades, has been careening to the theological and cultural left for years and its membership statistics show it. Thousands have left TEC and joined alternative Anglican churches."

"A Google search shows there's an Anglican church in Boulder that the Gorsuch family could be attending if they so desired," she continued. "So, the fact that the judge and his family has remained at St. John's says something."

(Excerpt) Read more at christianpost.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: church; court; ecusa; gorsuch; homosexualagenda; religiousleft; supreme; trumpscotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-152 next last
To: AnotherUnixGeek; Impy; Gay State Conservative
>> Conservatives have too often fought for "strict constructionist" types who turned out to be huge disappointments on the bench. Liberals fight hard to place liberal activists on the SC who will advance their causes - conservatives fight to place people who will maintain the status quo and are often disappointed to find that they won't even do that. The only way to stop the seemingly relentless tide of left-wing judicial activism is by appointing strong, committed right-wing judges - otherwise this is simply a losing effort. <<

Sadly, only you, me, and a handful of other FReepers seem to realize this common sense statement.

Assuming a SCOTUS nominee will vote the way we want because his "judicial philosophy" is said to be "strict constructionist" (or "originalist" or whatever they're calling it now) has PROVEN to be a total failure over the last four decades. Scores of judges that were marketed as so-called "strict constructionists" sided with the liberal activist crowd once they got a cushy lifetime job on the federal bench.

121 posted on 03/27/2017 10:23:53 AM PDT by BillyBoy (Impeach Obama? Yes We Can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Architect of Paradise
>> There is a lot of difference between Souter and Roberts. <<

Gorsuch, IMO, is closest to Sandra Day O'Connor.

Conservatives backing the O'Connor nomination could point to the fact she was a proud, loyal Republican for many years and there were several examples of times she went to bat conservatives and did things we liked when she was Senate Majority Leader in the AZ Senate. However, they have no evidence whatsoever that she was a social conservative or that she was pro-life (and plenty of evidence in her background hinting otherwise), but they said that didn't matter because her "judicial philosophy" was "strict constructionist", so her own views were irrelevant and wouldn't affect her decisions.

122 posted on 03/27/2017 10:28:46 AM PDT by BillyBoy (Impeach Obama? Yes We Can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: ICCtheWay
Shut the [f***] up... get this man confirmed

Yeah, well, thanks for sharing your wisdom.

123 posted on 03/27/2017 10:48:57 AM PDT by newgeezer (It is [the people's] right and duty to be at all times armed. --Thomas Jefferson, 1824)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: DungeonMaster
So he strictly interprets the constitution but loosely interprets the Bible? Very loosely.

Maybe Chuck U. Schumer is doing us a favor.

124 posted on 03/27/2017 10:50:25 AM PDT by newgeezer (It is [the people's] right and duty to be at all times armed. --Thomas Jefferson, 1824)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: manc

Maybe he didn’t listen to the pastor, like Maobama. Riii...ght.


125 posted on 03/27/2017 10:58:57 AM PDT by alstewartfan ("She got caught between the shadows and the booze." from Marion by Al Stewart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy

Exactly. Trump may have stiffed us. We’ll soon know. The good Episcopals left years ago thanks to “pastors” such as Gorsuch’s.


126 posted on 03/27/2017 11:02:04 AM PDT by alstewartfan ("She got caught between the shadows and the booze." from Marion by Al Stewart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy
A quick glance at the membership of various churches denomination in the history of this country would tell you that very little is attractive about the ECUSA.

Our appeal is becoming more selective...

The difference between the Catholic Church and the Episcopal Church in terms of demanding adherence to doctrine is that the Catholic Church has a policy that many would suggest is inadequately enforced. The Episcopal Church has no policy.

Consequently, we also have no quality control, which is why you see so many Episcopal Churches doing so many ridiculous things. On the other hand, absolutely nobody feels any need to take any of those ridiculous things seriously.

Obviously, it is not for everyone. Most people seem to want more structure, more certainty, and more control from a higher authority. I understand that. I just don't share that view.

If you can't stand to share a pew with people who think differently from you, you probably want to try another church down the road. If, however, you prefer the animating interaction of people with various views who treat each other with tolerance and respect (for the most part), the Episcopal Church might be for you.

127 posted on 03/27/2017 11:29:26 AM PDT by Haiku Guy (eliminate perverse incentives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: SaxxonWoods

Harriet Miers is a suit?


128 posted on 03/27/2017 11:37:33 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Ouchthatonehurt
He went to a Jesuit high school as well...doesn’t bode well IMO.

He went to a Jesuit high school, left the Catholic Church for the Episcopal church, and now attends one of the most liberal Episcopal churches in Colorado. Does that sound like the pedigree of a rock-ribbed conservative Scalia-replacement SCOTUS appointment to you?
129 posted on 03/27/2017 11:46:05 AM PDT by Antoninus ("The Western world has lost its civil courage, both as a whole and separately." -Solzhenitsyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: montag813
Gorsuch is Souter 2. You heard it here first.

LOL. Some of us have been saying that since about a week after the nomination was announced. We're going to be calling him "Gor-suck" if he is approved.
130 posted on 03/27/2017 11:52:26 AM PDT by Antoninus ("The Western world has lost its civil courage, both as a whole and separately." -Solzhenitsyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy

That shows that being a Republican and being someone who will rule in accordance with the Constitution are not the same thing. I believe that President Trump wants to keep faith with social conservatives. However, social conservatives communicated what they needed poorly, emphasizing religious liberty instead of the Right to Life.


131 posted on 03/27/2017 12:01:08 PM PDT by Architect of Avalon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: ICCtheWay

Your STFU recommendation is ill-suited to a debate forum.


132 posted on 03/27/2017 12:02:52 PM PDT by Architect of Avalon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Architect of Paradise

When people tell us to sit down and shut up, it often does not go well for us.


133 posted on 03/27/2017 12:31:55 PM PDT by Haiku Guy (eliminate perverse incentives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Roman_War_Criminal

Sure wasn’t long after God and His two angels showed up.

But prior to that, who knows. Obviously within whatever generation he was in and let enough time for the events that transpired afterwards (cough) within his lifetime.


134 posted on 03/27/2017 12:56:23 PM PDT by SaveFerris (Hebrews 13:2 Do not forget to entertain strangers, for ... some have unwittingly entertained angels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: johnk

I’ve not liked Gorsuch since I read about his chummy friendships with homosexuals. He’s also wishy-washy on abortion. Why in the hell the Heritage Foundation and National Review think he’s so conservative is beyond me. He sounds like a clone of Souter or Anthony Kennedy.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/neil-gorsuch-is-not-another-scalia

“Gorsuch on Obergefell

Also during the confirmation hearings, in response to a question about same-sex “marriage” and the results of the Obergefell decision – which many consider an even more outrageously corrupt, activist Supreme Court decision than Roe v Wade — Gorsuch stated it “is absolutely settled law.”

He did not just call it “settled law,” which one could say, well, yes, in legal terms that is what it could be said to be … for now. But he unnecessarily and disturbingly added the word “absolutely.” Why did he go to that length?

That comment seemed to indicate Gorsuch is not a full constitutional originalist. No originalist would ever make such a comment that appears to betray the Constitution and the intentions of the Founders – considering the travesty of the Obergefell decision.”


135 posted on 03/27/2017 12:58:11 PM PDT by NKP_Vet (In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle,stand like a rock ~ T, Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnk

I’ve tweeted Kelly Anne Conway and all pro-life sites I can think of the articles on Life Site News. Gorsuch is a liberal. I’ve also emailed/tweeted Jay Seculow, Franklin Graham, the Catholic League and many more and told them to investigate Gorsuch. I’ve been summarily ignored. If he’s confirmed and turns out to be another Souter or Kennedy I can say I did my part. I am not the only one worried about Gorsuch, but apparently his supporters think we’re crazy.


136 posted on 03/27/2017 1:05:07 PM PDT by NKP_Vet (In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle,stand like a rock ~ T, Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette

“His wife was born and raised in England and is literally “Church of England” from birth.”

He acts like a metrosexual girly man. No other reason he would have so many close sodomite friends who he praises on their “marriage” or leave Catholicism for the most liberal protestant faith in the country. His wife told him to. She wears the pants.


137 posted on 03/27/2017 1:11:07 PM PDT by NKP_Vet (In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle,stand like a rock ~ T, Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Lil Flower

Paula White preaches a “If it feels go, do it” false gospel, an apostate of monumental proportions.


138 posted on 03/27/2017 1:19:58 PM PDT by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: johnk

There is not enough support in the country to make all abortions illegal and GOP politicians have been cynically using the issue to keep well meaning but gullible people in the thrall of the GOPe. Let’s keep in mind that most of the high level bad actors like McCain and Dubya claim to be pro-life.

The truth is whether abortion is legal or not is a minor issue compared to immigration, the economy, the budget, healthcare, foreign policy etc. The law is not going to change anytime soon and conservatives have devoted too much energy to the issue.


139 posted on 03/27/2017 6:50:12 PM PDT by WatchungEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy

I can’t remember if Roberts had anything widely known that is eyebrow raising like the church this guy attends and is involved with, at least before he was confirmed. Did he?

I think probably this guy gets confirmed, so we will see eventually. You can always ping this thread if he turns out to be a stiff. Heck, you should probably ping it if he turns out to be a good one too. We need more of that on the internet.

Freegards


140 posted on 03/27/2017 8:37:17 PM PDT by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-152 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson