Posted on 04/04/2017 9:20:39 AM PDT by confederatecarpetbag
House Intel Dem: If Flynn Was Unmasked, It Would Have To Be Rice Who Did It
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
Wasn’t she so part of the Benghazi “internet video” fraud?
“IF” ?
Sounds like the Democrats have already decided that the best thing to do at this point is to make Susan Rice the sacrificial lamb and try to get everybody else to move on after that. Democrats never talked Off Script
Are there any co-ed federal prisons? It would be nice for Susan Rice to be able to share a suite with James Clapper and John Brennan.
For a long time!
SO, if it wasn’t done for political purposes, then why is it that only Trump and his staff were ‘unmasked’ ?
Susan Rice: Attack on Benghazi was Direct Response To Video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGXy_yhOfNg
Wayne but this Democrat just created a greater problem for themselves. He said she would be doing it because she is the one giving President Obama national security advice. Indicating that she was informing Obama of something she was so heavily engaged in.
All that’s left to be determined is what was passed onto the Clinton campaign and the national security meme is blown to hell.
Bingo. It’s purely politically partisan. And now we’re learning this unmasking possibly dates to 2015. Watch the spin: Libs will start claiming all Rice did was “request” unmasking, not officially “order” it. Legalisms are the last resort of scoundrels
And Brennan
Sounds like Flynn has grounds to sue her now.
Keep digging Dems.
There is so much here to answer.
1. Why Trump? How did you know Trump calls or calls from his advisors were already intercepted through incidental surveillance?
2. Why isn’t the President elect — for all intent and purposes not accorded the same privacy and diplomatic leeway as the Lame Duck? In other words, spying on the President elect is espionage. Espionage with a period.
3. A perfectly valid argument can be made that the lame duck term of a president from the election period to the inauguration is simply perfunctory and the real shots are called by the incoming administration in terms of Foreign Policy.
4. Where did she get info that Trump or Trumps advisors were John Doe in non FISA intercepts?
I’d bet the pardon was already signed by Obama, we just don’t know about it yet.
Yes........................
Yes, Jackie Speier blew it. There’s absolutely no way that monitoring the phone calls of Trump or the other GOP candidates or their advisors, starting months before the election and continuing practically up to the Inauguration, could have anything to do with national security. So if she was “briefing” Obama on these things, it wasn’t national security, they were both in on it and it goes all the way to the top.
Not that I thought it didn’t. I’m sure Hillary knew about it, too, and I have no doubt that the plan was hatched by Obama and people such as Brennan (who, btw, is supposedly a Muslim and I suspect has been fiddling with our data for a long time).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.