Posted on 04/25/2017 1:25:33 PM PDT by Trump20162020
If Trump wanted to tag and bag the whole swamp the only question that matters is: “Would the military support him?”
Sorry 'bout that. My sarcasm detector has been just lousy, lately, although I will say that I thought the comment was out of character for you.
I guess I've just been too serious of late. I tend to take things more literally when I get that way.
God bless Texas!
From my perspective, it’s been Trump VS corrupt government/big media/academia from day one.
>>If Trump wanted to tag and bag the whole swamp the only question that matters is: “Would the military support him?”
*********************************************************
That’s what I said to my husband during the election.
Did you happen to catch Carlson tonite? His guest was some gov’t official, idiot, from California. I listened in amazement to his completely insane interpretation of today’s judge’s ruling, calling it a great day for the Constitution and the rule of law, saying that DJT could not make up his own laws.
The problem is the uneducated and easily misled populace hears this warped view again and again in the MSM and wholeheartedly believes it. It’s so completely backwards to reality.
I said to my husband during the election and I’ll say it again. In order to save this nation and restore the republic, DJT is going to have to get his military generals to take the necessary action to permanently purge about half the population in this country.
To me, that is an impossibility. It’s just not going to happen, unless there is a war with many casualties only on the crazy commie side.
I think it’s probably a good idea to not undermine the constitution under Trumps administration.
That’s all I’m going to say.
I’m not advocating undermining it, if that is what your comment meant to imply. I try to observe and analyze what I see. At any rate, any action is in God’s (and our leader’s) Hands.
Absolutely. What would Andrew Jackson do? Problem is, Trump didn't fight back over the first two rogue judges, and the left figured they could opinion shop some no account back benching Dem appointee anytime they wanted. This has got to change! When some junior college judge has more power than POTUS, something is seriously off kilter.
He should refuse to fund the Ninth Circuit.
Need a 2/3 majority.
Exactly, getting behind removing rights from and enfranchised and fully adult in the eyes of the law minority...
Don’t forget them doing the same thing with respect to the 55 mph speed (thank Libby Dole for THAT!) limit and later seatbelt laws.
This sort of breakdown unless rolled back will inevitably lead to insurrection I would think
I’ve a mind to actually write about all the forces Trump is facing
It’s unprecedented
From the state and most aspects of the culture and of course media
All including his own party working harder than ever they have on anything to deprive him of another term or any ability to govern
It’s almost like war already
I’m not sure what to call it
This country has had minor rebellions and major secession slash intercine war between states and the central govt...a very costly adventure for everyone
But this is different ....it’s a concerted effort to stymie the man elected by the people
Monarchs especially in the period between the Tudors and Charles II had to deal with bureaucrats who would not be brought to heel but usually except during the Cromwell reign they had forces to thwart resistance of their directives
From 1066 thru the Tudors if a king actually held power then he usually had the power to insist on his demands
With exceptions...
Weak rulers and broke ones
Trump is being universally opposed in a voting Republic
Where this sort of thing leads is ominous in my book and I sure get no pleasure in that
Or do we simply submit to the progressive Borg so to speak with nary a whimper except maybe some lone wolf terrorism/freedom fighting here and there
As a parent I’m not optimistic for my kids long run
This would have never happened baring open borders and dark quotas but that’s a litttle late now
What do y’all think?
This judge thing today now establishes a pattern....it’s no coincidence
..”the point is the stall tactics”....
In other words..”Obstruction” yet again.
Alrighty then - time to send Sessions in to charge and prosecute those who make the sanctuary decisions.....
More winning.. Laff..
YES. The closest thing in history was Lincoln, whose own cabinet constantly schemed against him and whose enemies wanted to assassinate him. He could not win. Don’t free slaves? Then the very issue of the war-—the real issue-—would remain. Free them? Lose many northern whites.the USSC was against him.
He had to force the resignations of his entire canonet & then not implement them.
Aside from actual combat, the biggest difference was that yge Rs in Congress wantef him to be MORE aggressive so he truly was in the middle. Trump is on one end of a rope pulling against EVERYONE else, even the HFC at times.
Bingo! They may be activist judges, but they do not hold the purse strings.
The quip captures not the sociopathic myopia of a George Soros, who would never have bathed the "baby" to start with, but the idiotic consequences of those in the mainstrteam accepting the premises involved in the academic/media/political rejection of the very concept of the traditional nation.
Consider the recent moaning from EU spokesmen against the revitalization of nationalistic sentiments in Europe! What they are arguing--inter alia--is that the reason there has been no war among the EU members is the EU. But the obvious flaw in that argument, is that it supposes that throwing out the unique cultures of unique nations in favor of a centralized bureaucracy is required for nations to get the message that modern warfare serves no nations interest in an area as confined as non Russian Europe. This ignores something that is patently the more likely cause of that "peace."
World War II, with the great increase in technology, and explosive weapons--not to mention the innovation of Blitzkrieg warfare--greatly changed the public perception in every European country. The present Bureaucracy in Brussels, and the deep State holdovers--sabateurs--in our bureaucracy, are not the causes of a more peaceful intent, but rather parallel effects--mistaken parallel effects. Hence the concept of throwing out the baby with the dirty water.
Take another example of the same thing. The Le Pen candidacy being almost universally mislabeled in the media both in America & Europe, as "rightwing extremism. Query, is it really "extreme" in the French context, for one to recognize that the reason the French & Germans are no longer planning their next conflict, is simply a realistic recognition of what would be involved? Peace does not really require that the French scrap pride in the roots of their culture--and a determination to maintain it--in Charlemagne, Roland & Oliver, in order to comply with absurd dictation from a foreign bureaucracy, that demands not only free trade, but legal acceptance of an asexual, non ethnic, non patriotic, non-Christian demography.
It really doesn't.
still butthurt over Cruz?
Re-introduce the FDR Packing the Courts Legislation. Pass it and fix these courts instantly. easy all it takes is BALLS.....n Trumps has em Bowling Ball Size.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.