Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump State Department Fights to Keep Clinton Benghazi E-mails Secret
The New American ^ | 08 May 2017 | Joe Wolverton, II, J.D.

Posted on 05/08/2017 4:53:41 PM PDT by detective

Candidate Donald Trump said of Hillary Clinton’s e-mail scandal, “This corruption and collusion is just one more reason why I will ask my attorney general to appoint a special prosecutor.” He later upped the ante with the declaration, “She has to go to jail.” Now, it appears that the Trump State Department is working to keep the e-mails secret.

On May 5, Judicial Watch issued a press release announcing that U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson ordered the U.S. Department of State to turn over to the watchdog organization "eight identical paragraphs" of previously redact material in two September 13, 2012, Hillary Clinton e-mails regarding phone calls made by President Barack Obama to Egyptian and Libyan leaders immediately following the terrorist attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi. Both e-mails had the subject line "Quick Summary of POTUS Calls to Presidents of Libya and Egypt" and were among the e-mails stored on Clinton’s unofficial e-mail server.

(Excerpt) Read more at thenewamerican.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: 201209; 20120913; 20120915; amr; benghazi; benghaziemails; benghaziscandal; classified; clinton; clintonfoundation; donors; egypt; foreignleaders; foreignminister; hedgefund; kennedy; libya; marcmezvinsky; mohamedamr; obama; patrickkennedy; phonecalls; potus; statedept; tomnides; trumpadm; unclassified
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last
To: sargon

“:^)


61 posted on 05/08/2017 8:36:00 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Happy days are here again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
You don't even remember what you have posted to me, nor are you making any sense at all. Talk about RANTS...you win hands down!

You want the "last" word? Have at it; frankly, I don't care and have only replied as a courtesy and in order to refute the spurious, banal, puerile calumny you keep heaping, senselessly, upon me.

62 posted on 05/08/2017 8:43:25 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

I remember quite well what I posted to you, and what it was in response to.

You stated you say good things about Trump too. I responded that I don’t follow you around to see what you’re saying all the time. You then respond that you never charged me with stalking.

You take care.


63 posted on 05/08/2017 8:57:21 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Happy days are here again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: detective

There may be a valid reason to not release them - might be some serious security issues contained in the data.


64 posted on 05/09/2017 2:59:58 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: heterosupremacist

The New American is an old magazine that was originally put out by the John Birch Society, the anti-communist group. They are usually well intended and well sourced but sometimes go too far in seeing the government as a giant conspiracy. That is, they sometimes fail to recognize distinctions between the parties and as a result are too hard on the Republicans, who they lump in with the Dems. That may be what’s going on here. Or they might have a point. But they usually are not fake news.


65 posted on 05/09/2017 3:19:43 AM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: annieokie; penelopesire; maggief; Protect the Bill of Rights; thouworm; SE Mom; Nachum; onyx; ...

Benghazi ping.

Let Republicanprofessor know if you want on or off this ping list.


66 posted on 05/09/2017 3:36:49 AM PDT by Republicanprofessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective
Below from the link:

Additionally, Judicial Watch makes the case that the Trump State Department is purposefully sabotaging the group’s effort to hold Hillary accountable, something that Trump repeatedly promised to do on the campaign trail.

Judicial Watch argues:

An agency’s deliberate withholding of a FOIA claim, either to gain a tactical advantage or, as appears to be the case here, to protect the agency’s interests and those of its former head, is “a motive undoubtedly inconsistent with FOIA’s broad remedial purpose …” It “counsels denying the Government’s request.”

The emails in question were sent to then-top administration officials, including Clinton, Deputy Secretary of State William Burns, Under Secretary of State Wendy Sherman, Clinton Deputy Chief of Staff Jacob Sullivan, Special Assistant Robert Russo, and Deputy National Security Advisor Denis McDonough.

Mentioning the apparent increase in the influence of the so-called “Deep State” on the Trump administration, Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton asks, “Does President Trump know his State and Justice Departments are still trying to provide cover for Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama?” Fitton continued, “An extraordinary court ruling that could result in key answers about the Benghazi outrage is being opposed by the Trump administration. This may well be an example of the ‘deep state’ trying to get away with a cover up — if so then the Trump administration must put a stop to it.”

Mike Lofgren, author of The Deep State: The Fall of the Constitution and The Rise of A Shadow Government, defines the Deep State as “the powers-that-be that they believe actually run the country regardless of electoral results:

the Wise Men, the Power Elite.” With this apparent legal maneuvering to keep Hillary Clinton from being held accountable for her betrayal of the Americans who perished at the Benghazi attack, one wonders if the Deep State has pulled even President Trump into their oligarchical orbit.

.................

My guess is that this problem of teh State Dept.(most likely) leftover obama tards trying to sabotage Trump is a function of not enough time to adequately drain the swamp.It will happen we just have to be patient,IMHO.

67 posted on 05/09/2017 3:51:54 AM PDT by rodguy911 (Home of the Free because of the brave.MAGA!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz
When you add up all the big time people who could be subject to prosecution just in the Clinton foundation alone forget the pedo ring it's near endless.

I think this is why Comey is and has backed off. He knows if he starts going after too many big names history says he's the one who pays not them. He could be right.

there well could be safety in numbers we are talking about in the criminal enterprises that go in the world wide cabal.

How do you successfully go after thousands of big names?

68 posted on 05/09/2017 3:58:44 AM PDT by rodguy911 (Home of the Free because of the brave.MAGA!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
That's because it is still, sadly, Obama's State Department. When is Trump going to do something about that?

I think you are correct. I think this is what is going on. Trump has not yet been able to drain the deeper parts of the swamp.

69 posted on 05/09/2017 4:02:33 AM PDT by rodguy911 (Home of the Free because of the brave.MAGA!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Excellent post you are right there.


70 posted on 05/09/2017 4:05:53 AM PDT by rodguy911 (Home of the Free because of the brave.MAGA!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911

Your point is well-made.

Looking at the global antics of the Clinton Foundation, all of the players acted without restraint.

There is a distinctive uniform mindset.

I think they believed that all of their activities-—posed against the fake front of the Clintons’ predatory “do-goodism”——shielded them from the illegalities.


71 posted on 05/09/2017 4:14:36 AM PDT by Liz (Shutting down conservatives' free speech is a form of hate speech. samtheman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: ptsal

Lee Harvey Oswald killed JFK


72 posted on 05/09/2017 5:02:34 AM PDT by KosmicKitty (Waiting for inspirations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: KosmicKitty

For some reason I have doubt that is the whole answer.


73 posted on 05/09/2017 5:26:24 AM PDT by ptsal ( Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. - M. Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: ptsal

Then that’s your problem. Good luck with that.


74 posted on 05/09/2017 5:29:36 AM PDT by KosmicKitty (Waiting for inspirations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: ptsal

LBJ !!!


75 posted on 05/09/2017 7:53:40 AM PDT by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA

Oh that’s why I didn’t know about this ‘The New American’...I don’t read the John Birch Society stuff...thank you for that information...


76 posted on 05/09/2017 8:05:02 AM PDT by HarleyLady27 ( "The Force Awakens!!!"...Trump and Pence: MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: ptsal

The Mafia


77 posted on 05/09/2017 1:07:23 PM PDT by arrogantsob (Check out "CHAOS AND MAYHEM" at Amazon.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911

It is something that needed to be taken care of right away, but wasn’t and the longer it all remains as is, the worse things are going to get. And now, they are after Icahn, who doesn’t even have any position, in this administration....yet.


78 posted on 05/09/2017 1:28:47 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: New Jersey Realist

“So Trump defies this judge yet complies with the idiots on the 9th Circus?”

It was not Trump, it was State Department employees.

The headline should have been phrased better.

See post #16.


79 posted on 05/09/2017 2:11:30 PM PDT by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: trebb

“There may be a valid reason to not release them - might be some serious security issues contained in the data.”

See post #16.


80 posted on 05/09/2017 2:13:32 PM PDT by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson