[Cboldt]

My point is like Clinton's "depends on what the meaning of is is." If Comey thinks "leak" is only "leak" if it is an "illegal leak," then he didn't leak, he "shared."

Seriously, no reasonable prosecutor would bring a perjury case against Comey for this, any more than any reasonable prosecutor would bring an obstruction case against Trump for "Hope Flynn thing stops."

[1Old Pro]

My point is like Clinton's "depends on what the meaning of is is." If Comey thinks "leak" is only "leak" if it is an "illegal leak," then he didn't leak, he "shared."

Proving it depends on one's interpretation of the word in context, kinda like what pledging "loyalty" means or "seeing your way through" means.