Posted on 06/23/2017 6:25:56 AM PDT by outinyellowdogcountry
ping....
<>GotNews
Katie Pavlich is an anti-Trumper. Or, at least she used to be!
There was no censorship at Breitbart that I can see. I saw the article yesterday. They didn’t add a link that they should have added. They usually only post excerpts so how could this really be censorship?
Bkmrk.
I did not read the story either on Breitbart or otherwise. GotNews people were formerly at Breitbart and there is bad blood. I really don’t understand what is going one but like I said I think it is interesting. Also it always helps to know back stories to understand the why and how things get reported.
Mr. Johnson is screaming “censorship” because Breitbart News and Town Hall ran the Coulter column without a link to an “anti-Trump hate map”?
He is grasping at straws here. Yawn.
I find the Breitbart and InfoWars websites too full of ads to actually find any news...GotNews, too.
Is Breitbart still a good new source? Any thoughts/opinions?
I stay on Freep 99% of the time and only an occasional “unsee, unsee” stupid story is posted, but mostly great content.
Content from American Renaissance is not allowed at FR due to racism. Every site has its own policy on these things.
Make no mistake. The Left DOES want people on the Right DEAD! If they could get away with it, theyd have already tried it.
Thank you for telling me that. I had not heard of American Renaissance until today. The racism thing may be more the reason Breitbart and Townhall made their decision. Can you tell me where the racism shows up? Like I said, never heard of them before.
They are white supremacists/separatists.
“I find the Breitbart and InfoWars websites too full of ads to actually find any news...GotNews, too.
Is Breitbart still a good new source? Any thoughts/opinions?
I stay on Freep 99% of the time and only an occasional unsee, unsee stupid story is posted, but mostly great content.”
To be fair Breitbart has gotten to be pretty big (which is a good thing) by running ads.
Breitbart and Free Republic are two of me essential go-to sites.
Yikes!
This seems to be a common (if dumb) policy among some conservative sites. They ban any content, even good, well-sourced original material, from a subjective list of taboo “racist” sites. It’s ultimately a self-defeating policy, as this article shows (the SPLC doubtless considers Stormfront and FR as two peas in a pod anyway).
Lee Stranahan loves Marlow. /s
Everything is a conspiracy, don’t you see?
Given the frequent uncomplimentary references to "Amish", you are correct.
Freerepublic.com is on SPLC's list of "active antigovernment groups(as "Free Republic")
I don’t see FreeRepublic as an anti-government site. It’s a limited/Contitutional government site!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.