Posted on 07/23/2017 5:56:38 PM PDT by Carbonsteel
Of course the study will not be publicized by the dominant media outlets; if it manages to sneak out anyway it will be claimed that it was “debunked”.
Our turn to laugh - their turn to cry..
Academics...people who can not DO anything of value to others, so they pontificate for profit.
Well lookie here and surprise, surprise!
Most Freepers have known that for a few decades now, based on the simple knowledge of the clear easy definition of what science is, and the obvious fact that the climate scam isn't science, but that hasn't prevented at least 3 decades of phenomenal hysterics and trillions of $$ of waste with mythical crap like "unicorns and rainbow" carbon credits.
The only quibble I have with this headline is the total abuse, misuse of the phrase "nearly all..."
Ain't no "nearly" about it!
Well lookie here and surprise, surprise!
Most Freepers have known that for a few decades now, based on the simple knowledge of the clear easy definition of what science is, and the obvious fact that the climate scam isn't science, but that hasn't prevented at least 3 decades of phenomenal hysterics and trillions of $$ of waste with mythical crap like "unicorns and rainbow" carbon credits.
The only quibble I have with this headline is the total abuse, misuse of the phrase "nearly all..."
Ain't no "nearly" about it!
Well lookie here and surprise, surprise!
Most Freepers have known that for a few decades now, based on the simple knowledge of the clear easy definition of what science is, and the obvious fact that the climate scam isn't science, but that hasn't prevented at least 3 decades of phenomenal hysterics and trillions of $$ of waste with mythical crap like "unicorns and rainbow" carbon credits.
The only quibble I have with this headline is the total abuse, misuse of the phrase "nearly all..."
Ain't no "nearly" about it!
I refuse to accept even that.
A hodge-podge spotty smattering of very limited world wide temperature records may be a curious snapshot of weather, and interesting, but climate is a whole different animal.
I contend that there are no long term (hundreds or thousands of years) reliable and accurate record of highs or lows until the advent of universal and repeatable satellite remote sensing.
Definitely a common sense observation from the written record of actual (unsettled) science.
And if you choose snopes as a reliable authoritative source of Science facts, you have way too much time on your hands, are science deficient and need to choose new hobby.
I suggest collecting baseball cards.
Just keep denying that volcanic eruptions contribute thousands (millions?) of times more enormous quantities of CO2 into the world climate engine...
As for me being science deficient, I completed 31 hours of college chemistry and had a career in the industrial chemicals manufacturing sector. I actually worked as an analytical chemist and a product development chemist . I worked for the polluters, and know a lot about air pollution.
My first experience with air pollution regs was in the early 70s, before the clean air act took effect. Gov Reagan signed the California air pollution legislation in 1968.
I doubt that you attended college.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.