blackpacific:
"Wolves and dogs are the same species. " Factually, they are not the same species, you can look it up.
blackpacific: "So after numerous tries you have not produced a single example of one species “evolving” into another.
Adaptation within a species is what you have showcased."
I've mentioned dogs & elephants, but could mention any number of others.
For example, domestic cattle are no longer the same species as the Aurochs from which they descended.
Domestic cats are no longer the same species as wild cats they descended from.
Domestic pigs are not a separate species, but are a different sub-species from wild pigs.
The key point here is that evolution happens relatively slowly and continuously, such that great differences between species take longer times.
As a result, measuring the amount of difference between any two species gives us clues as to their most recent common ancestors.
"Darwin's arguments by similarity rely upon ignorance of what is going on at the cellular and molecular levels.
Those who continue to promote his ignorant ideas are stupid, and having a Darwinian world view retards the development of true science."
If I had taken your philosophy 101 course, where your instructor taught you to argue by insult, I'd demand my money back.
You were clearly defrauded in that class.
As for your claim, "development of true science", it's a fact that US courts have consistently ruled that anti-scientists are not permitted to call your own fake-science "true" or re-define real science to suit your own non-science beliefs.
blackpacific: "...organic chemistry ...11,000 carefully controlled reactions to produce outside the cell.
Which is both a testament to the gift of reason and the awesome majesty of our Creator."
Right, the Earth is one of God's chemical reaction chambers.
He designed, intended & made it to produce what we see:
Immortal, Invisible
Your arguments continue to be circular, assuming what it is you must prove. I have stated numerous times that similarities between species is no argument for evolution of species. As they say in statistics correlation is not causation.
My eyes are always open to the truth, no matter where it may be found, but there simply is no evidence that the order we see around us comes from chaos or that the Second Law of Thermodynamics can ever be violated.
Scientific knowledge is to be found in many differing disciplines.
Drinking the Kool-Aid of the evolutionary world view is not a prerequisite for the true scientist, but it is in the minds of many who perhaps are motivated by their desire for research funding.
You continue to lay down the “philosophy 101” insult, but it is an insult without merit. I think it was a beauty for you to insist that your world view constitutes science while those who disagree with you are un-scientific. I’m glad the US court system has sided with the evolutionists like yourself, after all they were the same entity who decided that slaves were property and that innocent little babies can be ripped from their mothers’ womb piece by piece, regardless of their age or viability.
God does not need evolutionary processes to create, but godless men do need a system that can explain the origins of living creatures without a Creator.
Of course, every one of us must die, for at least from the fossil record we are pretty sure that not a single human body has ever exhibited the trait of immortality (although with evolution anything is possible?). Oh, if you believe in the Bible then maybe we can make an exception for Enoch and Elias, and Jesus for that matter. Nevertheless, every human being will have to render an account before the judgement seat of Christ. What will He do with our vain theories/conjectures about the origins of life that seem to be constructed to leave the Maker out of the picture? “He came into the world, and the world was made by Him, and the world knew Him not.” Do you think that He will be giving out atta-boys for the minds who have foisted these unscientific hoaxes upon the rest of mankind so as to sever them from their true End?