Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Traffic fatalities linked to pot are up sharply in Colorado
KKTV ^ | 8-28-17

Posted on 08/28/2017 6:09:36 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic

Federal and state data show that the number of drivers involved in fatal crashes in Colorado who tested positive for marijuana has more than doubled since 2013. A Denver Post analysis of the data and coroner reports provides the most comprehensive look yet into whether roads in the state have become more dangerous since the drug's legalization.

It shows that Increasingly potent levels of marijuana were found in positive-testing drivers who died in crashes in Front Range counties.

The trends coincide with the legalization of recreational marijuana in Colorado.

However, Colorado transportation and public safety officials say the rising number of pot-related traffic fatalities cannot be definitively linked to legalized marijuana.

The industry counters that the data is imprecise and does not definitively link fatal crashes to marijuana use.

(Excerpt) Read more at kktv.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: cannabis; dopersrights; dui; dwilaws; fakenews; fatalities; legalization; marijuana; pot; potheads; reefermadness; wod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 last
To: afraidfortherepublic

Gee I thought marijuana was benign.
You know, used for medicinal purposes....


61 posted on 08/28/2017 10:25:33 AM PDT by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carl Vehse

They need to look to the greedy people who decided to legalize this idiocy. By the way,this problem is only part of the overall problem that also affects other states. I think law enforcement folks can vouch for this.


62 posted on 08/28/2017 10:58:15 AM PDT by oldtech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Carl Vehse

They need to look to the greedy people who decided to legalize this idiocy. By the way,this problem is only part of the overall problem that also affects other states. I think law enforcement folks can vouch for this.


63 posted on 08/28/2017 10:58:47 AM PDT by oldtech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

The denial is there, alright, except it’s yours.
All the drivers would test positive for hemoglobin, too, but that doesn’t mean it is a factor in their deaths.


64 posted on 08/28/2017 12:07:41 PM PDT by sparklite2 (I'm less interested in the rights I have than the liberties I can take.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TheStickman

I haven’t seen the 35% number, and I have emphasized that my issue is recreational use. As I said, if I had your problems, I might well do likewise. Good luck


65 posted on 08/28/2017 1:14:39 PM PDT by achilles2000 ("I'll agree to save the whales as long as we can deport the liberals")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: robroys woman

Someone just told me that there are varieties with 35% THC. If I had a medical condition that pot mitigated, I would consider using it. But, you are right, what we’ve lived through is analogous to the switch from beer to gin (see Hogarth) or other distilled spirits. As a recreational drug, pot is going to create a lot of highly impaired “citizens”.


66 posted on 08/28/2017 1:18:56 PM PDT by achilles2000 ("I'll agree to save the whales as long as we can deport the liberals")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: robroys woman

Someone just told me that there are varieties with 35% THC. If I had a medical condition that pot mitigated, I would consider using it. But, you are right, what we’ve lived through is analogous to the switch from beer to gin (see Hogarth) or other distilled spirits. As a recreational drug, pot is going to create a lot of highly impaired “citizens”.


67 posted on 08/28/2017 1:18:57 PM PDT by achilles2000 ("I'll agree to save the whales as long as we can deport the liberals")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

I’ve always thought that if they actually tested for weed in all accidents, they’d find it more often than not...


68 posted on 08/28/2017 1:21:44 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KEVLAR
I don't trust the media...

but I trust my instincts...

I predict that we'll get all these studies about how bad weed is and then we'll get whole new depts. and programs to combat it, of course having to raise taxes and fees significantly...

we'll have weed education now in grade school...

thanks you stupid, stupid, silly people...

69 posted on 08/28/2017 1:23:36 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic
Fake news.

"Positive test results reflected in the NHTSA data do not indicate whether a driver was high at the time of the crash since traces of marijuana use from weeks earlier also can appear as a positive result."

70 posted on 08/28/2017 1:48:36 PM PDT by NobleFree ("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: achilles2000
criminalization, like Prohibition, is the wrong response to RECREATIONAL use. Some people will always use alcohol and other drugs. There are no utopian solutions. What you can do is provide disincentives (no welfare for drug users), enforce laws against any form of public intoxication, and work at persuading people.

Amen!

71 posted on 08/28/2017 1:52:03 PM PDT by NobleFree ("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Eric Pode of Croydon
Meaningless without the raw data.

Spot On. I was going to post something similar.

The Brady Bunch used to quote gun crime in percentages instead of numbers. I remember when they touted Clinton's AR ban decreasing crime by those guns by 33%. Turns out those crimes dropped from, IIRC, .66 to ,44 of one percent.

72 posted on 08/28/2017 2:15:12 PM PDT by Oatka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
So it’s like we’re not allowed to talk about negatives of marijuana, because the 10th amendment or libertarian political philosophy takes priority over any bad news reports such as this.

You can talk about the negatives all you want. What is upsetting to some Freepers who actually want to live in a free country is that you forget that it isn't the government's job to protect people from their own choices. Tobacco has negatives. Alcohol has negatives. Cough medicine has negatives. Vicodin has (serious) negatives. Operating a motor vehicle at all has negatives, even when you're sober as a judge. If we're going to live in a free country, then "Pot is bad for you!" is not an acceptable argument for giving the government and its law enforcement agents sweeping powers to chuck your butt in jail and take all your stuff.

By the way, in all states where marijuana has been legalized, driving while stoned is still highly illegal.
73 posted on 08/28/2017 2:52:21 PM PDT by fr_freak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

Lying with STATISTICS, I do not smoke but I did in the 60S, long before most of the knee jerk reactions here, and there was not an EPIDEMIC of people dying from smoking Pot...there is an increasing incidence of it being found in the blood of the dead drivers, citation required..


74 posted on 08/28/2017 3:48:43 PM PDT by hawg-farmer - FR..October 1998 (---->VMFA 235 '69 -'72 KMCAS <--- F4 PHANTOM... FLYING BRICK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sparklite2

You are funny! I don’t think hemoglobin slows response time, or causes hallucinations.


75 posted on 08/28/2017 4:06:31 PM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

Itsy amazing you got them off the couch.
Must’ve been a taco bell run


76 posted on 08/28/2017 7:50:37 PM PDT by Keyhopper (Indians had bad immigration laws)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson