[Wolfie]

For example, do you think it would be good if white Americans had their own version of the NAACP designed to pursue their racial interests? Do you think white voters should explicitly vote for candidates because they share their race like black Americans often do?

Actually, "Yes" to both questions.

[xp38]

Yep.

[ReaganGeneration2]

Race-peddlers think these 2 premises:
a) Whites are the problem (with anecdotal or pre-60s evidence)
b) Whites must help (taxes, quotas, open borders)

If you get them to admit these seemingly disconnects, they will say “Whites must pay us back”. This has been the answer for 50 years and will never stop.

Until someone in Fedral gov’t says:
a) Those examples are anecdotal or apply to earlier generations, not us
b) It Is Enough

[miss marmelstein]

I doubt Harvey taught libs anything. But it reminded me yet again how much white men - masculine men of any color - are responsible for so much good in this world. I didn’t see any member of NOW rescuing disabled, sick or the elderly this week.

[machman]

I could have written this myself, I’ve been saying it for a longtime, once whites adopt the demonrat’s identity politics, it is over for the rats.

[gaijin]

Later

[uncbob]

And yet there are still enough brain washed white people yanking the democrat lever com

[gaijin]

Ten or fifteen years ago and Economist added up all of the money spent on the war on poverty.

the amount was enough to buy all of the common stock of all of the Dow Jones index; every company every single share.

and there was still enough money left over to buy every acre of arable Farmland in the USA.

[cdcdawg]

The liberal attitude towards white people is “die, honkey.” They are very upfront about it. Any pushback means you are a White Supreemist. Maybe it’s better for your people to be exterminated than to have the media call you a name. And it’s not like demographic changes will mean the end of the Constitution or free markets. Will it?

[Nea Wood]

...do you think it would be good if white Americans had their own version of the NAACP designed to pursue their racial interests? Do you think white voters should explicitly vote for candidates because they share their race like black Americans often do? Should white Americans be given an explicit advantage in college entrances and government jobs for a few years to make up for all the years minorities were given preference over them because of their race via Affirmative Action?

Yes, yes, and yes.

[Altura Ct.]

Liberals Don’t Get To Have It Both Ways With White Americans

Yep, but it won't stop unless whites collectively push back. All other race groups have race specific representation. Whites instinctively know that there is a problem but the left is still pushing whites in the direction they want and effectively doing so because when it comes to race, whites in general, refuse to stand up to specifically protect themselves offering some sort of empty platitudes about how race doesn't matter which has no effect whatsoever of the lefts agenda therefore the left keeps pushing and whites keep backing up.

[Ancesthntr]

There was a movie made a few years ago called “A Day Without Mexicans” or something like that. I would love to see a movie made that would cover first 3 days after white people disappeared. I am sure then on the first day most stores would be looted. By the third day, there would be gangs in control of entire cities, and it would be getting worse every hour. Of course, no one will ever dare to make a movie like that, nor will any company ever distribute it. But I do believe that everyone in our society knows that something like that would actually occur.

[SamAdams76]

The most disturbing part of this article is that it is true that by 2050, white people will be in the minority in America. Disturbing in the fact that unless something radically changes, blacks and hispanics tend to be on the receiving end of our tax dollars and not on the giving end. So we will eventually run out of money and the government will be forced to seize the 401(k)s and other retirement savings that people have saved for themselves so far so that the welfare state can continue. This will put those who have saved in the same boat as those who did not save.

Immigration is part of this but another major reason is that affluent families tend to have less than two children. So they are not even replacing themselves. However, it is not unusual for poorer families (or single mothers) to have several children raised on government money. These children grow up with a sense of entitlement as well as less education and less of a work ethic.

Ronald Reagan's prediction may come true, where there are more people riding in the wagon than pulling the wagon. We still have time to reverse this but there is not much room for error. Demographically, we are heading down a very bad path.

[unread]

Linebacker Christian Kirksey from the Cleveland clowns said "We're not protesting against them. We just have our reasons of why we're doing what we're doing."

Seems the players are a little upset because the Cleveland police and fire department refused to hold the flag while those stinking rats take a knee...

The liberals hate it when we fight back.....

[brianr10]

This is what Jared Taylor has been saying. We can do identity politics, too.

[lurk]

The Frank Roosevelt Dems are dead. Their children are dying in numbers. Regions dominated by love for the Dem party due to traditional love for Roosevelt, such as WV, are looking for a new political home. Anarchists in the Dem party are helping them to make the decision.

[SandRat]

but, Geezers why not? They’re Liberals! </rid1cule

[Vaduz]

Liberals are shooting them self in the foot by their actions for the last year it’s a lame and dangerous logic exposed.

[conservatism_IS_compassion]

All well and good - but the problem is always, “Who will bell the cat?”

“The cat” is not really the Democrat Party. “The cat” is monopoly wire-service journalism. Essentially, the AP and its member news ^propaganda outlets. All very well to speak of sauce for the goose being sauce for the gander - but what happens to anyone who explicitly stands up for white people as white people???

It all boils down to the fact that the AP is like a great middle linebacker, who will always get to the point of your attack no matter where it is. You can’t run away from it, because it will always catch up with the play. If you can run at all, you can only do so by running at it - because nobody else on their team will be nearly as able to help it, as it will be able to help anyone else on the team.

Thanks be to God, SCOTUS is not lost - as it would already have been, had Hillary were POTUS. We can’t rely on Congress, even with Republican majority leaders in both houses. And we can’t rely on the POTUS, except to the extent that he is naming good judges. If we can bring the right case to SCOTUS, we should IMHO be able to trim the sails of the AP.

The AP is a monopoly which in 1945 was found by SCOTUS to be in violation of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act (1890) - Free Republic. But back then, the issue before the Court was a mere fight between two wire services, on the one hand, and the possibility of serious sanctions against wire services as such would have been considered utterly impractical on the other. Now both the issue and the potential remedy which could be considered are on an entirely different scale.

Now the tort inflicted is not merely on a business competitor, the tort is inflicted on American society.  

People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices. It is impossible indeed to prevent such meetings, by any law which either could be executed, or would be consistent with liberty and justice. But though the law cannot hinder people of the same trade from sometimes assembling together, it ought to do nothing to facilitate such assemblies; much less to render them necessary. - Adam Smith, Wealth of Nations

The AP and its member news outlets are “people of the same trade” - journalism - and the AP newswire is a virtual meeting among them all. This “meeting” started in the middle of the Nineteenth Century, with no end is in sight. And this “meeting,” far from concerning only "merriment and diversion,” is precisely about the prosecution of “trade” of journalism. According to Adam Smith, then, the existence of a “conspiracy against the public” among the AP and its members is inevitable. But how and why does the resulting conspiracy act against the public?

The motive of any conspiracy is to promote the interests of the conspirators. The inherent motives of journalists are to promote the importance and profitability of journalism. Journalists want to be paid, everyone does. And journalists “want to make a difference." Adam Smith again:

The man whom we believe is necessarily, in the things concerning which we believe him, our leader and director, and we look up to him with a certain degree of esteem and respect. But as from admiring other people we come to wish to be admired ourselves; so from being led and directed by other people we learn to wish to become ourselves leaders and directors . . .

The desire of being believed, the desire of persuading, of leading and directing other people, seems to be one of the strongest of all our natural desires. - Adam Smith, Theory of Moral Sentiments (1759)

The question is, “How and to what extent does the desire of journalists (as opposed to, say, plumbers or carpenters) for influence run counter to the public interest?” What is “the public interest,” anyway? The interest of society lies in “life” (security), “liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” of persons whatever their status in society. The interest of society lies in the absence of bad news to report. In contrast, the interest of journalism lies in gaining the interest and credence of the public. Since reporting bad news to society, about society, is the sovereign path to gaining the interest of the public, interesting the public is pretty close to being the very opposite of “the public interest.” Thus, journalism has practically no motive to report good news about society, but plenty of motive to report bad news about society.

The implication of that is very clear:

Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil . . . For were the impulses of conscience clear, uniform and irresistibly obeyed, man would need no other lawgiver; but that not being the case, he finds it necessary to surrender up a part of his property to furnish means for the protection of the rest; and this he is induced to do by the same prudence which in every other case advises him, out of two evils to choose the least. Wherefore, security being the true design and end of government, it unanswerably follows that whatever form thereof appears most likely to ensure it to us, with the least expense and greatest benefit, is preferable to all others. - Thomas Paine, Common Sense (1776)

That is, skepticism about society is the only justification for government. Reporting only bad news about society ineluctably justifies ever more government. Faith in society is the inverse of faith in government, cynicism about society tends to justify expanded government, even tyranny. Society’s interest is in freedom; ideologically monopolistic journalism, simply by following its S.O.P. for selecting what stories to report, and how extensively to report them, promotes tyranny.

And that is only by part of what they admit to doing. The AP also publishes standards of the way things are expressed, including things like never referring to illegally present aliens as anything but “undocumented.” This is a blatant expression of ideological monopoly “reporting.” What they do not admit to is lying - libeling people and organizations which are significant to society.

One blatant example of this is George Zimmerman - a man whose prosecution was promoted by journalism. Including by the blatant procedure of broadcasting the famous recorded discussion between Zimmerman and the police, with an answer and then a question excised. The investigators into the death of Trayvon Martin found ample evidence to vindicate Zimmerman’s account, and journalism conspired in plain public view to have Zimmerman indicted and tried. The evidence presented at trial vindicated the initial decision not to recommend prosecution. And yet the fact that Mr. Zimmerman’s actions were legal can be expressed, as Thomas Sowell might say, only "anonymously or posthumously.”

Another example would be the Duke Lacrosse “rape” case, which was promoted long enough for a baby to be conceived and gestate to full term. Notwithstanding the fact that less than two weeks in it was pretty obvious that the defendants were being railroaded. As the defendants were ultimately vindicated.

Similarly, it is presently obvious that “anti-fascist” is currently a code for actual fascist behavior.

This sort of thing has been happening in America at least since the communists were being opposed by Whittaker Chambers and Senator Joe McCarthy, and probably before.

Is it actually possible that all that is not a tort which is actionable in court?

[Lazamataz]

Liberals Don’t Get To Have It Both Ways With White Americans

Incorrect. Liberals get to have it an infinite number of ways, in order to advance their agenda.`