Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Home Brewing Is Legal, And Home Distilling Should Be Too
The Federalist ^ | 09/06/2017 | C. Jarrett Dieterle

Posted on 09/06/2017 8:19:52 PM PDT by ForYourChildren

Treating home distilling as illegal makes little sense, given that homebrewing and wine making have been legal at the federal level since 1978.

In the aftermath of its failure to pass a health-care overhaul, Congress appears poised to turn to tax reform. While income and corporate tax rates will likely garner most of the attention, alcohol producers are also hoping for changes to booze taxes. Specifically, brewer, vintners, and distillers have been pushing on Capitol Hill for the Craft Beverage Modernization and Tax Reform Act, which would lower federal excise taxes on alcohol.

Despite attracting nearly 300 co-sponsors in the House and more than 50 in the Senate, the bill has failed to get a vote in recent sessions of Congress. There’s renewed hope for the act this year—perhaps as part of a larger tax overhaul—but the current version of the bill is missing a key feature of previous iterations: the legalization of home distilling. Whereas the 2015 version of the act included a provision that would have permitted distillation of up to 24 proof gallons per year for personal consumption, that provision has been stripped from the new version of the bill.

Americans Can Already Brew Some Kinds of Alcohol

Treating home distilling as illegal makes little sense, given that homebrewing and wine making have been legal at the federal level since 1978, when President Jimmy Carter signed legislation allowing Americans to produce limited amounts of beer and wine for personal consumption. Nearly 40 years later, many beer industry analysts have argued that Carter’s home brewing reform was a key factor in the meteoric rise of the craft beer movement.

{..snip..}

(Excerpt) Read more at thefederalist.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: breweries; deregulation; distilleries; homebrewing; revenuers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 last
To: Rurudyne

“A matter of State laws, not federal.”

There ARE states that set a limit on the amount one can produce but NOT SELL. Have a good friend that has been doing that for years but nothing has ever been said about not “giving it away”, to my knowledge.


61 posted on 09/07/2017 6:32:14 AM PDT by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator
I think it should be legal but there are a lot of stupid people out there that don’t know methanol from ethanol.

You say that like it's a bad thing. ;-)

62 posted on 09/07/2017 6:48:01 AM PDT by IYAS9YAS (There are two kinds of people: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Drago
What are “the rules” for home-brew beer as far as “distribution” goes? Can I give a case to my neighbor w/o a “tax-stamp”? I assume I cannot sell him a case?

With regard to home-brewed beer, the federal rules state the production is limited to personal use (includes family/friends/co-workers), thus it cannot be sold. Limit is 100 gallons per calendar year for households with one adult (anyone over 18 for federal law), and 200 gallons per year with households with two or more adults.

Federal law also allows the removal of homebrew from the premises where it was brewed. Some states still restrict the consumption of home brew to the premises where it was brewed.

Here is a link to the rules for California - https://www.homebrewersassociation.org/homebrewing-rights/statutes/California/. Basically the same as feds, but restricts adult to being 21 or older.

63 posted on 09/07/2017 7:03:50 AM PDT by IYAS9YAS (There are two kinds of people: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Boomer

Plenty of people doing it where I am - or once was - or will be - I don’t recall


64 posted on 09/07/2017 7:06:59 AM PDT by Pollard (TRUMP 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren
After seeing a couple of people destroy their lives with alcohol, I swore it off but I still have a taste for beer. A friend was really into home brewing, so I asked him if it was possible to make home brewed near beer. He did some research and concluded that you can but it has to go through a distillation process to remove the alcohol that requires a federal license. He found out that the big brewers who make no-alcohol beer have licenses for the grain alcohol created as a by-product.

Seems ironic that a brewer would need a distilling license to create no-alcohol beer.

65 posted on 09/07/2017 7:59:32 AM PDT by CommerceComet (Hillary: A unique blend of arrogance, incompetence, and corruption.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren

“Maybe not, but I still can’t find the power over alcohol give to the Feds in the Constitution.”

It’s a perfectly Constitutional excise tax. Google up The Whiskey Rebellion.

L


66 posted on 09/07/2017 8:01:46 AM PDT by Lurker (President Trump isn't our last chance. President Trump is THEIR last chance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren

“Not in this case, it’s all about control. You can’t do it.

It’s not about taxation.”

It is about taxation. In FL you just have to pay the $4000 state tax to do so.


67 posted on 09/07/2017 8:12:50 AM PDT by Justa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Bullish

I think it’s a holdover from Prohibition. Besides, the gumment has to get their cut on excise tax.


68 posted on 09/07/2017 8:28:26 AM PDT by gogeo (Trump appears to be working 18 hours per day while congress canÂ’t seem to get in 18 hours per week.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

“It’s a perfectly Constitutional excise tax.”

Just like guns.

No guns for you.


69 posted on 09/07/2017 8:53:04 AM PDT by ForYourChildren (Christian Education [ RomanRoadsMedia.com - Classical Christian Approach to Homeschool ])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Karl Spooner

“Whiskey Rebellion or something like that.”

Yeah. New government put a tax on distilled spirits. West of the Appalachians whiskey was used as currency. The fed. tax in effect taxed all financial transactions in the Ohio river valley hence the revolt. Distiller and CIC Washington used troops to put it down, leading them himself.


70 posted on 09/07/2017 9:00:21 AM PDT by Justa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

“You don’t know much about early American history, our founding fathers, and taxes.”

You don’t know much about the Constitution and the 10th Amendment in particular.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution


71 posted on 09/07/2017 9:15:55 AM PDT by ForYourChildren (Christian Education [ RomanRoadsMedia.com - Classical Christian Approach to Homeschool ])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: gundog

You remember correctly. What happened in 1978 was that home-brew beer was made legal. Wine was made legal earlier, but a quirk in the law kept beer making illegal.


72 posted on 09/07/2017 9:23:32 AM PDT by hanamizu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: exDemMom
Overall it cant be nearly as hard or dangerous as people claim. My grandmother ran a still in the cellar as a kid. She mixed a little burned sugar into it because then it wasnt regular clear moonshine and people wanted to pay more for her "whiskey". The fellow who used to buy it claimed it was going Chicago and later eventually into Capones network.

It remains common enough around here and Ive never heard of anyone around here getting sick.

I really dont horse with it. I brew beer and make wine and mead, I occasionally freeze distill a small bit of strong apfelkorn type drink. I do wish I could find grandma's recipe though.

73 posted on 09/07/2017 9:46:14 AM PDT by gnarledmaw (Hive minded liberals worship leaders, sovereign conservatives elect servants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Boomer

I checked this out.

Questions!

You had yours long?
Seems to be reliable?

I hate buying chinese stuff with it only to crap out in six months.


74 posted on 09/07/2017 9:46:38 AM PDT by Original Lurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: IYAS9YAS

Thanks for the home brew legal info.!


75 posted on 09/07/2017 4:31:23 PM PDT by Drago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Original Lurker

I never had a problem for as long as I used it. It’s basically a version of the table top water distiller sold through various names. They say it heats up to a lower range to allow the alcohol to distill out rather than the water. Alcohol becomes a vapor at 172 degrees or so if I remember right. Water of course boils at 212 degrees but becomes a vapor somewhere around 200-208.

In my humble opinion it doesn’t really matter that much if you use the so-called water distiller or the so-called alcohol distiller because both will distill the alcohol first. If your product ends up being 80-90 proof rather 110; it just means you will get more product at what most alcohol is sold at.

If you want it stronger; put some through a second time to raise the percentage/proof level. If you keep an eye on ebay; you can find the water distillers used for much cheaper. I recommend this for people who just want to play with it for a while to see what it’s like. If a person wants to take it up to the next level; that site I mentioned, and others, have more expensive and more involved equipment to do so. Just be sure to throw away that first part of every batch because it will make people go blind. I don’t know if it alters the taste but it’s methanol and not the drinking ethanol.

The goal is to make a tasty drink; not the most powerful although most people do make an extra batch of the kicker 180 proof just to have it around to offer those who just have to try it at that level. Mason jars work great for this.


76 posted on 09/07/2017 7:31:40 PM PDT by Boomer (The term "RINO" is now being replaced with "Socialist Republicans". Oh; the irony!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: T-Bone Texan
I have made many gallons of hard apple cider actually and have meant to attempt freeze distillation but the technique I previously described works very well and it allows you to remove methanol and other impurities unlike freeze distillation. Mainly, however, it's just easier. In the winter, I would look into substituting snow for ice to save $$$$.
Using copper pots and bowls would likely be an improvement as well. I really don't even drink anymore however so it's all just academic to me.
77 posted on 09/07/2017 10:15:09 PM PDT by RC one (The 2nd Amendment is a doomsday provision, one designed for those exceptionally rare circumstances)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Boomer

Good info. Thanks!


78 posted on 09/08/2017 1:24:17 AM PDT by Original Lurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson